Ana M. Dinis1, Jacinto Benhadi-Marín1,2, Pedro Nascimento1,3, José A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The transferring and management of water and nutrients, and the mechanism of productivity in rice paddy ecosystem Weijun Zhou, Kelin Wang, Kairong Wang.
Advertisements

Bachelor Reserve vs. Oxford’s “Mile Square”. Introduction  Purpose - To study insect diversity in the Bachelor Reserve and the "Mile Square“ to see whether.
 Simpson's Diversity Index is a measure of diversity. In ecology, it is often used to quantify the biodiversity of a habitat. It takes into account the.
Bird Trip: Me Sunday April 29 or May 6? Need binoculars? Transportation?
Measures of Center and Variation
Chapter 2 Simple Comparative Experiments
The Analysis of Variance
FARMS MULTIFUNCTIONALITY AND HOUSEHOLDS INCOMES IN SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT Session 4: Income and Employment of the Rural Household By Marco Ballin.
Native Bees Along Elevation Gradients as Bioindicators of Climate Change Scott Daniels 1, Dave Smith 2, Neil Cobb 3 1. Cesar Chavez High School, Laveen,
Calculating Diversity Class 3 Presentation 2. Outline Lecture Class room exercise to calculate diversity indices.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION MATERIALS & METHODS INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION Dany Silvio S.L. Amaral 1, Madelaine Venzon 2, Helder H. Santos 2, Marcus V. A. Duarte.
ITEC6310 Research Methods in Information Technology Instructor: Prof. Z. Yang Course Website: c6310.htm Office:
MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WILDLIFE BIOLOGY DATA Bret A. Collier 1 and T. Wayne Schwertner 2 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas A&M University,
Food Security, Environmental Change, Biodiversity, and Interdependencies Jeff Brawn Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences.
Eric Kortenhoeven Mentor: Dr. Neil Cobb Hooper Undergraduate Research Award (HURA)
Ana Elisa Rato 1,4, Renato Coelho 1, Margarida Vaz 1, Teresa Carola 2, Dália Barbosa 2, Nádia Silva 1, José dos Santos 2, Lourenço Machado 2, João Godinho.
Effects of increased dissolved organic matter on zooplankton vertical distribution in a UV-transparent lake: Results from large-scale mesocosms Sandra.
Categorical vs. Quantitative…
OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies Istanbul, 29 June 2007 BIODIVERSITY.
Taxonomy Species Concepts, & Biological Diversity EEOB September 2004.
Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
1 Chapter 2 Bivariate Data A set of data that contains information on two variables. Multivariate A set of data that contains information on more than.
Statistical analysis Why?? (besides making your life difficult …)  Scientists must collect data AND analyze it  Does your data support your hypothesis?
Displaying & Exploring Data Ir.Muhril Ardiansyah,M.Sc.,Ph.D.1 Chapter 4. Describing Data: Displaying And Exploring Data
C.4: Conservation of biodiversity
Week 9: IB Biology Monday: G.4.: Conservation of Biodiversity ‘Explain the use of biotic indices and indicator species in monitoring environmental change’
1 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF JOINT STUDY PROGRAMME IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Instituto Politécnico de Bragança Portugal brief institutional.
How do we define Biodiversity Quantitatively? The National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis.
Science 1 biodiversity.
The distribution of ostebund aggregations (Porifera) in relation to oceanographic processes in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. Joshua Davison1, Nils Piechaud1,
Trace gas emissions from the soil related to
Results and Discussion
Biodiversity and agriculture
AP Biology Intro to Statistics
Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Coleoptera of forensic interest: A study of seasonal community composition and succession in Lisbon, Portugal  Catarina Prado e Castro, María Dolores.
Fungal and Bacterial Dynamics in the Lettuce Rhizosphere Responding to Successive Additions of Cd and Zn. A. M. I. D. Amarakoon * and R. M. C. P. Rajapaksha.
Charlotte Levy1 & Eloise Brown2
31th International Meeting on Systematics and Biology of Staphylinidae
3rd Conference on Neglected Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases (EurNegVec): with MC and WG Meeting of the COST Action TD1303 Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae)
Chapter 2 Simple Comparative Experiments
From: Can We Afford to Conserve Biodiversity?
Physico-chemical and organoleptic characterization
AP Biology Intro to Statistics
Statistics For biologists
Population Dynamics Topic 2
AGRICULTURE TENDENCY INDEX IN INDONESIA: PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES
IET 603 Quality Assurance in Science & Technology
Introduction to Ecology
22-1: Community properties
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
: The Biosphere.
Measuring Biodiversity
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
What is the evidence for employee engagement in the University sector 2014 Findings from stage 1. Jane Tidswell, Account Manager
ECOLOGY THE INTRODUCTION.
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Simpson’s Diversity Lab
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Species Diversity.
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE)
Land cover patterns of wind generation infrastructure in Brazil
(A) Box-and-whisker plots illustrate the median, maximum, minimum, and first and third quartiles of the distribution of the number of observed OTUs and.
Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding using inexact potentials: how accurate must parameters be in order to preserve the essential features of the.
by Robbie Weterings, Chanin Umponstira, and Hannah L. Buckley
4. IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
The Effects of Pond Characteristics on Communities of Large Invertebrates Alexander R Salazar1,2, Debora Goedert3,4, Craig D Layne3, Kathryn L Cottingham3,
4. IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
Descriptive Statistics Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept.
Chapter 12 Statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Coleoptera assemblages of the olive grove and the surrounding landscape in Trás-os-Montes (Portugal) Ana M. Dinis1, Jacinto Benhadi-Marín1,2, Pedro Nascimento1,3, José A. Pereira1, José P. Sousa2, Sónia A. P. Santos1, 4* 1Mountain Research Center (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal 3 Federal Institute of Rondôna, Campus Ariquemes, 76870-000 Ariquemes, Brasil 4Barreiro School of Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Rua Américo da Silva Marinho, 2839-001 Lavradio, Portugal. *Email: saps@ipb.pt Introduction Coleoptera order represents one of the most abundant and diverse group of arthropods in the olive agroecosystem. Besides providing innumerous ecosystem functions they are also important bioindicators and are capable of inhabiting different kind of systems depending on the available resources. The objective of this work was to compare assemblages of Coleoptera between the olive grove and the surrounding landscape composed mainly by shrubland, and to assess the extent to which these systems support different beetle families. Material and Methods Figure 1. A – Example of the experimental design; B – Olive grove; C – Shrubland; D – Collection of pitfall content; E – Detail of a sample in the laboratory. B C D E A Pitfall trap In 2015, 4 olive groves (Fig. 1B) located near Mirandela (northeastern Portugal) and their respective surrounding shrublands (Fig. 1C) were sampled. Nine pitfall traps were installed in each selected plot and placed apart 30 m from each other. Sampling was conducted between the 2nd of May and the 20th of June and traps were substituted on a weekly basis (Fig. 1D). All captured beetles were counted and identified to the level of family (Fig. 1E). For each ecosystem the total family richness, distribution of families and the most abundant families are shown. The complementarity index (C) was calculated according to Colwell & Coddington (1994) and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess statistical differences between the olive groves and the shrublands in terms of abundance, family richness and diversity (Simpson´s Index) per plot. B C Results ). A B C D A total of 2243 individuals were captured belonging to 31 families. The olive groves registered higher abundance of beetles (1193) while higher family richness (30) was found in the shrublands (Table 1). Sydmaenidae and Staphylinidae were dominant families in shrublands while Tenebrionidae and Melolonthidae in olive groves (Table 1) (Fig. 2). Table 1. Total abundance and family richness of Coleoptera captured in the olive groves and the shrublands. 3 9 11 14 23 25 29 Shurblands Olive groves 17 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 13 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 24 26 27 28 30 31 C = 0.26 Figure 2. More abundant families of Coleoptera captured in the shrublands : A – Sydmaenidae; B – Staphylinidae and in the olive groves: C – Tenebrionidae; D – Melolonthidae. * Figure 3. Total abundance, family richness and family diversity of Coleoptera captured in both ecosystems per plot. * indicates significant differences between the two treatments. Error bars extend from the minimum to maximum value, continuous horizontal line within the boxes indicates the median and the boxes extend from the first to the third quartile. Total abundance was not significantly different between olive groves and shrublands (W = 0.29, df = 1, P = 0.59) whereas the richness of families per plot and the diversity were in both cases significantly higher in olive groves (W = 26, df = 1, P < 0.01 and W = 20.7, df = 1, P < 0.01 respectively) (Fig. 3). Figure 4. Families of Coleoptera exclusive in the shrublands, the olive groves and found in both ecosystems (central area). C: Complementarity index. Conclusions Olive groves and shrublands supported the same families of Coleoptera, since the exclusive families were represented by singletons, however, the most abundant families in each system were different and the differences in diversity may indicate that olive groves and shrublands can offer different benefits in terms of food, microclimate, humidity and refuge against predators, probably allowing population fluxes between the two ecosystems. Future studies should be conducted considering environmental variables in order to uncover the effect of the drivers involved in the community dynamics. Reference: Colwell R.K. & Coddington J. A., 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Vol. 345, No 1311. Biodiversity: Measurement and Estimation: 101-118. UNIÃO EUROPEIA Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional This work is part of the project: EXCL/AGR-PRO/0591/2012: Olive crop protection in sustainable production under global climatic changes: linking ecological infrastructures to ecosystem functions, funded in the research lines of excellence of FCT. 13-15 de Abril de 2016