From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: Human perception of subresolution fineness of dense textures based on image intensity statistics Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):8. doi: /
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2003;3(5):3. doi: /3.5.3 Figure Legend:
From: Vector subtraction using visual and extraretinal motion signals: A new look at efference copy and corollary discharge theories Journal of Vision.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does print size matter for reading
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading Journal of Vision. 2013;13(11):14.
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(2):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The modern Japanese color lexicon
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
From: Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception Journal of Vision. 2015;15(14):1.
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contour extracting networks in early extrastriate cortex
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: StarTrek Illusion—General object constancy phenomenon?
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):14. doi:10.1167/11.12.14 Figure Legend: Conditional central moments for three neighboring image points. (a) The 1st moments are the means: μ = u 1. (b) The 2nd moments are plotted as the standard deviation: σ = u 2 . (c) The 3rd moments are plotted as the skewness: γ 1 = u 3/u 2 3/2. (d) The 4th moments are plotted as the excess kurtosis: γ 2 = u 4/u 2 2 − 3 (a Gaussian has an excess kurtosis of 0), where the central moments for each pair of values (s, t) were computed in the standard way: u 1 = n −1∑x, u 2 = n −1∑(x − u 1)2, u 3 = n −1∑(x − u 1)3, u 4 = n −1∑(x − u 1)4 (see Kenny & Keeping, 1951; Papoulis, 1984). (e) Number of training samples for each value of s, t. (f) Conditional distributions for the five sample pairs of (s, t) values indicated by the dots in (a)–(d). The plots have not been smoothed. Date of download: 1/2/2018 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved.