Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of the test rig

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Illustration of the two distributer designs used with the test rig: (a) design (A): four arms and (b) design (B): eight arms

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: CO2 absorption efficiency using NaOH solvent at different degree of solvent saturations with distributer (A)

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Temperature of NaOH solvent at different degree of solvent saturations with distributer A

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Effect of distributer design on CO2 absorption efficiency using NaOH solvent with 50% saturation

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Effect of exhaust gas flow rate on CO2 absorption efficiency using NaOH solvent with 50% saturation

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Effect of water type on CO2 absorption efficiency using NaOH solvent with 50% saturation

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Comparison of NaOH solvent temperature between tap sweet water and seawater with 50% saturation

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: CO2 absorption efficiency for half saturated (NaOH versus Ca(OH)2) solutions with half flow rates

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: CO2 adsorption temperature profiles at two locations in the container of NaOH sorbent with half flow rate of the exhaust gas

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: CO2 adsorption efficiency for different materials

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Evaluating the Performance of a Newly Developed Carbon Capture Device for Mobile Emission Sources J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062101-062101-8. doi:10.1115/1.4036962 Figure Legend: Comparison between the adsorption exit gas temperature of NaOH and, 50% NaOH, 50% Ca(OH)2 sorbents. Temperature measured at the top surface of the container.