IPPOG 2nd CB Meeting, 22 June 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
Advertisements

ILASS-ASIA Bye-Laws 1/3 ILASS-ASIA Constitution and Bye-Laws of ILASS-Asia (The Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems-Asia) Adopted at December.
Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2 nd Session of Consultation October 2011.
1 Future of NamGIS Johan van Rensburg Polytech 14 October 2005.
AEGIS: MOU and Associate Member Agreement Gerald Moore Adapted by Lorenzo Maggioni for Vegetables Network Meeting, 9-13 November 2009, Catania, Italy.
Resources and Financial Plan Sue Foffano WLCG Resource Manager C-RRB Meeting, 12 th October 2010.
Report to ECFA, 21 Nov 2013 Prepared by IPPOG Co-Chairs: Hans Peter Beck: Bern University Marjorie Bardeen: Fermilab Presented by Steven Goldfarb, ATLAS.
Working Group 1 New IPPOG Members- Associated to the LHC Programme (e.g. new CERN member states, etc.) Friday a.m. working groups – IPPOG Meeting Kosice,
Report to RECFA, November 20 th 2014 Hans Peter Beck: IPPOG Co-chair, Bern University Marjorie Bardeen: IPPOG Co-chair, Fermilab.
Notur: - Grant f.o.m is 16.5 Mkr (was 21.7 Mkr) - No guarantees that funding will increase in Same level of operations maintained.
News from IPPOG, April 16 th 2015 Hans Peter Beck, Marjorie Bardeen: IPPOG Co-chairs IPPOG Meeting #9, Paris, April 2015News from IPPOG1.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
Committees. Executive Committee Terms of Reference Committee Type – standing Purpose -. Manage the business and technical affairs of Open Health Tools.
EUROSAI Professional Standards – Goal Team 2 Brief introduction Cristina Breden Mária Kysucká Vilnius, September 2012.
Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality Access to Statistical Data for Scientific Purposes Helsinki, Finland, 5 to 7 October 2015 Presentation.
CERN as a World Laboratory: From a European Organization to a global facility CERN openlab Board of Sponsors July 2, 2010 Rüdiger Voss CERN Physics Department.
ECFA European Committee for Future Accelerators Report from the chairman M. Krammer HEPHY, Vienna, Austria November 8, 2014RECFA UK1.
Astroparticle Physics European Consortium What can large Astroparticle Physics projects like LAGUNA-LBNO expect from the new APPEC, the Astroparticle Physics.
Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science (ETPLAS) FELASA BoM Update Brussels, 12 June 2016 David Smith, Chair Steering Committee.
Working Group: Beatrice Bressan, IPPOG Meeting, Innsbruck, April 2012.
The Role of the Economic and Social Council of Bulgaria for the Development of Civil Dialogue and New Forms of Consultations Prof. Lalko Dulevski President.
CONNECTIONAL MINISTRIES REACHING FURTHER WITH THE GOSPEL BY SHARING THE LOAD.
Bylaws Standing Rules Code of Ethics
Collaboration Matters & MOU 28 th of June 2016 Maria J. G. Borge.
NATIONAL MEDIA VISITS Visits for print, radio, agency media during LS1 April April 2014 Hello, In order to reply to the huge amount of visit requests.
Third PMC meeting University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica
Transforming the future of public health in Missouri
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
The ESM Dr. Nellie Munin.
IPPOG Meeting, April 2017 Hans Peter Beck: IPPOG Co-chair, Bern University Steve Goldfarb: IPPOG Co-chair, Melbourne IPPOG Meeting #13, Lisbon,
Global Solar Certification Network
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
Options for association and collaboration with CERN
IPPOG Collaboration Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal
Objectives of WHO's collaboration with NGOs
CESSDA – for what and for whom?
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Parliament and the National Budget Process
Annual General Meeting 28 June 2016 Ottawa, Canada
IFNA’s Approval Process for Anesthesia Programs
VENICE ISLE HOME OWNERS, INC.
MUSC Faculty Senate October 18th, 2016.
13th IPPOG Meeting, Lisbon, April 2017
IPPOG 1st CB Meeting, 22 April 2017
Parliamentary oversight in the Republic of Uzbekistan
KM3NeT institute board meeting
TERMS OF REFERENCE - FINANCE COMMITTEE
ERIC Experiences and New Developments
Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2nd Session of Consultation
SANIRE Branches Guidelines
Staff Forum 101 We Are Here For You.
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
19 Oct Teleconference Agenda
Sponsored Programs at Penn
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Item 6.1 COICOP revision Conclusions: The Working Group participants generally agreed with the proposed new structure for COICOP with some reservations.
Great Lakes Wind Collaborative: Who We Are and What We Do
Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015
Finance and SFVS for School Governors
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Prof. Lalko Dulevski President of the ESC of Bulgaria
Strategy
Review of the 1958 Agreement
Adult Education Survey Anonymisation Point 6
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Proposal for amendments to the Statutes
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

IPPOG 2nd CB Meeting, 22 June 2017 Hans Peter Beck: IPPOG Co-chair, Bern University Steve Goldfarb: IPPOG Co-chair, Melbourne IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

1st IPPOG Collaboration Board Meeting 22/04/2017 Quorum (2/3) = 11 out of 16   Member Representative Proxy Signature 1 Australia  Steve Goldfarb 2 Belgium Dirk Ryckbosch 3 CERN Barbora Bruant Gulejova 4 Finland Panja-Riina Luukka 5 France Nicolas Arnaud 6 Germany  Uta Bilow 7 Italy Katja Peduto 8 The Netherlands Charles Timmermans 9 Norway Farid Ould-Saada 10 Poland 11 Portugal Pedro Abreu 12 Romania Gabriel Stoicea 13 Slovak Republic Ivan Melo 14 Sweden 15 Switzerland 16 USA Marjorie Bardeen

CB Matters Adoption of the Agenda and quorum Discussion and Vote https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838 Adoption of the Agenda and quorum Discussion and Vote Addenda to the MoU on the Participation of Scientific Collaborations Addendum SC vote required Addendum SC-X template, not for vote Participation of Scientific Laboratories Addendum SL vote required Addendum SL-X template, not for vote Participation of Countries Addendum N vote required Addendum NF vote required IPPOG Budget 2017 vote required Discussion only Proposal of Finance Committee IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Organization Country/Lab/Experiment Date signed 1 NIKHEF The Netherlands 22 September 2016 2 DESY for KET Germany 23 September 2016 3 Physics Department of University of Oslo Norway 21 October 2016 4 LIP Portugal 1 November 2016 5 The Section for Elementary Particle and Astroparticle Physics of the Swedish Physical Society through the Swedish LHC Consortium Sweden 6 CHIPP Switzerland 4 November 2016 7 Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport Slovak Republic 15 November 2016 8 Institute of Atomic Physics Romania 17 November 2016 9 Helsinki Institute of Physics Finland 29 November 2016 10 FWO + F.R.S.-FNRS Belgium 30 November 2016 11 CERN 19 December 2016 12 INFN Italy 21 December 2016 13 CNRS/IN2P3 France 23 December 2016 14 The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Poland 29 December 2016 15 CoEPP Australia 14 February 2017 16 The University of Notre Dame on behalf of Quarknet USA 14 March 2017 IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

IPPOG MoU Addenda to MoU clarify the expectations we have for Members Countries Scientific Collaborations Laboratories A provisionary Budget has been distributed Addenda and Budget will be discussed and put forward for a vote. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addenda to the MoU ARTICLE 15 AMENDMENT 15.1 This MoU may be amended by a decision of the Collaboration Board by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast. Amendments specify further how IPPOG deals/handles specific issues, clarify how the MoU is to be interpreted. Amendments can not be in contradiction with the MoU – if in doubt, the MoU wording prevails. 15.2 The amendment of Addenda shall be subject to agreement of its signatories. Here, signatories are those directly concerned. E.g. between a Lab and IPPOG, specifying the agreed contributions, etc. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Glossary of Terms An amendment defining the terms we are using in IPPOG, the Glossary of Terms, has shown to be important for the writing of further amendment documents. This Glossary of Terms is intended to be completed with further terms as it will be required in the future evolution of IPPOG. https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633284/attachments/1479044/2292568/IPPOG_MOU_Addendum_Glossary_draft_CB.pdf IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

IPPOG Funding 8.1 The IPPOG Collaboration shall be funded by annual membership fees, other contributions, grants, subsidies, donations and sponsorship support, including in-kind contributions (collectively “Support”), which shall all be recorded in writing. 8.2 The annual membership fee shall be decided by the Collaboration Board. 8.5 Acceptance of proposed in-kind contributions and their value shall be decided by the Collaboration Board. 8.6 In-kind contributions made by a Member shall not diminish its obligation to pay the annual membership fee except insofar as agreed by the Collaboration Board in accordance with criteria established by the Collaboration Board. 9.1 The Collaboration Board shall each year, in principle at its session held during the second of the biannual meetings of the Forum, adopt the budget for the next year. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Member Categories 3.1 National and international governmental bodies, professional societies, laboratories and institutes, as well as scientific collaborations active in particle physics or related sciences are eligible to apply for membership. Where there is no national organisational structure or leading institute for particle physics research, relevant funding bodies are also eligible to apply for membership. 3.2 Membership shall be organised on a national basis such that the bodies mentioned above shall together propose one among them for membership in the IPPOG Collaboration. It is understood that international bodies, including laboratories and scientific collaborations having a significant international participation, are eligible to apply for membership in their own right. This boils down that in IPPOG, we have Countries, Experiments, and Laboratories. Support to IPPOG (membership fee, in-kind, etc.) needs to be specified in addenda specific to the member categories, and case by case. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addenda to the MoU Need to specify the Membership Fee, the support and expectations for all Member categories and all Members. The criteria to settle these need to be agreed on and added in written in the form of addenda to the MoU. IPPOG has expectations from Countries Addendum_N_countries_draft from Experiments Addendum_SC_scientific_collaborations_draft and from Laboratories Addendum_SL_scientific_laboratories_draft who are/will be Members in IPPOG. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addendum_N_countries Participation of the chosen national body shall imply the commitment to represent the entire particle physics community in the country through deploying and maintaining efficient communication channels, enabling the promotion of IPPOG activities to all IPPOG key audiences at their institutions and sites, for enabling students, teachers and others interested to participate in IPPOG activities in as many places in the specific country as reasonably can be achieved. This is specified in Addendum_N_countries https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633264/attachments/1479037/2292556/IPPOG_MOU_Addendum_N_countries_draft_CB.pdf IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addendum_NF_annual_membership_fees_countries The annual membership fee asked from a national member representing a country in IPPOG shall be one of three values (low, medium, high), as are agreed by the IPPOG Collaboration board, considering the specific situation of the country. This breaks down to to 1k€, 3k€, and 5k€ depending on GDP and community size. If some national Member falls close to the boundary, the case may be treated specifically upon request, subject to the agreement of IPPOG Collaboration Board. This is detailed in Addendum_NF_annual_membership_fees_countries https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633266/attachments/1479039/2292560/IPPOG_MOU_Addendum_NF_annual_membership_fees_countries_draft_CB.pdf IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addendum_SC_scientific_collaborations 1 Participation of Scientific Collaboration in the IPPOG Collaboration shall imply a strong commitment to participate in IPPOG recognized activities through providing access to data, expertise, tools and methods for outreach and educational purposes that are based on their physics program. 2 The membership fee asked from a Scientific Collaboration in IPPOG can be waived upon a written agreement between this Scientific Collaboration and IPPOG in form of an Addendum to the IPPOG MoU subject to decision made by IPPOG Collaboration Board in mutual agreement with the concerned Scientific Collaboration, specifying the exact areas of commitment relevant for its participating in IPPOG. 3 In general matters the minimum requirements are the following: 3.1 Recognition of outreach as an important element of research activity. 3.2 Recognition and support of those members of their collaboration who devote a considerable fraction of their time to educational and outreach efforts. 3.3 Strong commitment to provide access to experimental data for IPPOG recognized educational and outreach activities, which implies developing and maintaining tools, methods and documentation to exercise analysis and scientific reasoning based upon the Scientific Collaboration’s actual and continuing physics program. https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633268/attachments/1479040/2292562/IPPOG_MOU_Addendum_SC_scientific_collaborations_draft_CB.pdf IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addendum_SL_scientific_laboratories 1 Participation of Scientific Laboratories in the IPPOG Collaboration shall imply a strong commitment to participate in IPPOG and its recognized activities through substantial In-kind and monetary contributions enabling the sustainable success of IPPOG efforts. These contributions shall be mutually negotiated on an individual basis per Scientific Laboratory and agreed by the IPPOG Collaboration Board and the signing Scientific Laboratory. The exact areas of commitment relevant for participating in IPPOG shall be specified in form of an Addendum to the IPPOG MoU between this Scientific Laboratory and IPPOG, which shall be subject to a decision made by the IPPOG Collaboration Board in mutual agreement with the concerned Scientific Laboratory. 2.1 They may include contribution to the personnel needed to execute IPPOG coordination, development and expansion of the IPPOG Collaboration (e.g. IPPOG Scientific Secretary, IPPOG Administrative Secretary); 2.2 They may include contribution to logistics for the IPPOG meetings when on their site; 2.3 They may include support to IPPOG website development and maintenance; 2.4 They may include contribution to the personnel needed to organize and execute the IPPOG recognized activities relevant to the specific scientific program conducted by its hosted and recognized Scientific Laboratories. https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633280/attachments/1479042/2292564/IPPOG_MOU_Addendum_SL_scientific_laboratories_draft_CB.pdf IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Addenda Templates Addendum_SL_X_Scientific_Laboratory_Terms_of_Participation_Template_draft Is not for vote, it is there for giving guidance for the negotiations with Laboratories who are potentially joining IPPOG. https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633282/attachments/1479043/2292567/IPPOG_MOU_Annex_SL-_Template_Terms_of_Participation_Scientific_Laboratory_draft_CB.pdf The specific Addenda, specifying the agreed contributions from each single laboratory joining IPPOG will be subject to vote. Addendum_SC-X_Scientific_Collaboration_Terms_of_Participation_Template_draft Is not for vote, it is there for giving guidance for the negotiations with Experiments who are potentially joining IPPOG. https://indico.cern.ch/event/647838/contributions/2633279/attachments/1479041/2292563/IPPOG_MOU_Annex_SC-X_Template_Terms_of_Participation_Scientific_Laboratory_draft_CB.pdf The specific Addenda, specifying the agreed contributions from each single experiment joining IPPOG will be subject to vote. IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Budget 2017

Budget – Expected Income IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017

Budget – In-kind support IPPOG CB Meeting #2, Vidyo, 22 June 2017