Wikipedia Network Analysis: Commonality detection among Wikipedia authors Deepthi Sajja.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL United Club Card Concept Test - Research Proposal - Prepared by: FRC Research Corp. September 28, 2012.
Advertisements

To trust or not, is hardly the question! Sai Moturu.
Wikipedia. The setting and the open questions We examine the organization in summer of 2006 –Jimbo Wales has been named one of the 100 most influential.
Ethics and Methods in Cultural Anthropology
BRIDGET NOWLIN CORNISH COLLEGE OF THE ARTS LIBRARY Art History Research Studio.
Evaluating Search Results Fundamentals of Research Capital Community College Spring Semester 2013.
The Collaborative Organization of Knowledge D. Spinellis and P. Louridas Strong Regularities in Online Peer Production D. Wilkinson Ziyad Aljarboua Monday,
Managing Software Projects Analysis and Evaluation of Data - Reliable, Accurate, and Valid Data - Distribution of Data - Centrality and Dispersion - Data.
Web of Science® Krzysztof Szymanski October 13, 2010.
Finding Credible Sources
Tajik Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia Ibrahim Rustamov Note: To view pages on the Internet properly with all Tajik letters, please.
Non-FictionNon-FictionNon-Fiction Lit. & Comp.- Introduction to Non-Fiction Non-Fiction.
Research, Data Sharing & Publication/Authorship Protocols Lynch Syndrome Screening Network - October 27, 2012.
Wikispaces Welcome Wikispaces in K–12 Education [date and time] Welcome Read-only Web v. Read/Write Web Wikis Getting Started with Wikispaces Wrap-up and.
Kaitlyn Graber, Kenny Henault, Mike Hoelzel, Aaron Hall.
Contribution Patterns Among Active Wikipedians: Finding and Keeping Content Creators Seth Anthony ( [[User:Seth Ilys]] ) Wikimania 2006 – Wiki Community.
Citing a website article - MLA Cite it at easybib.com Website: A collection of online informational pages on the world wide web that typically covers related.
INTRODUCTION TO NONFICTION. WHAT IS NONFICTION? The subjects of nonfiction are real people, and the events are actual happenings. Nonfiction can tell.
Writing Across the Curriculum
How do we Keep on Learning?
Contribution Patterns Among Active Wikipedians: Finding and Keeping
Wikispaces in K–12 Education
LOCUS: Preparing Medical Students for Community Health Leadership
Finding Credible Sources Online
Some(what) Grand Challenges for Information Retrieval
Disinformation on the Web:
Wikispaces in K–12 Education
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Introduction to Research
Child Health Global Leadership Mapping
Lecture 3: Reviewing the literature
Inquiry, Pedagogy, & Technology: Automated Textual Analysis of 30 Refereed Journal Articles David A. Thomas Mathematics Center, University of Great Falls,
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Information Systems in Organizations Introduction Christy L. Greening
The Wonderful World of Kaisa Visa Yumi.
Unit 4 Introducing the Study.
How often do you get information from the Internet
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Information Systems in Organizations Introduction Kapish Vanvaria
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Understanding the Rhetorical Situation: A.P.P.L.E.
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
4 Ways to PEPP Your Channel Sales
Formal Features of Literature
Welcome to English 110.
Welcome to English B1A.
Relative ranking.
Welcome to English B1A.
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Welcome to English P101A.
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Wikipedia Network Analysis: Commonality detection among Wikipedia authors Deepthi Sajja.
Jamie Weinstein, MPH The MayaTech Corporation,
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
and for the theatre community
Introduction to Research
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Credible Sources October 23rd 2014.
Welcome to English P101A.
Main Idea vs. Author’s Purpose
Welcome to English B1A.
Summarizing vs. Analyzing
Mini Research Project Evaluating Sources.
Welcome to English B1A.
Evaluating the Reliability of a Source
Welcome to English P101A.
No Zombies Here! Kristi Castleberry​
Trend Mapping Template
Presentation transcript:

Wikipedia Network Analysis: Commonality detection among Wikipedia authors Deepthi Sajja

How many of you have ever edited wikipedia article/articles? How many of you have analysed or read about wikipedia network?

Introduction: Evolution of Wikipedia Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia in 2001. Articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process. Goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia.

Content distribution of Wikipedia

Growth of Wikipedia As of October 25, 2016 there are 5,269,891 articles

Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? An interview was conducted with 22 volunteer encyclopedia writers in the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005 Volunteers include people who spent up to 30 hours a week

Motivation behind the contributors Like scientists,contributors to Wikipedia seek to collaboratively identify and publish true facts about the world.

Motivation behind the contributors credibility Wikipedia has indirect attribution of authorship. Most have been edited numerous times by numerous people and explicit attribution would seem to be impossible.

Inequality of Contributions great number of authors with few contributions Small group of authors contribute to large number of articles and the other group contributes to one or two articles and also mostly participates in editing the existing articles.

Slowing Growth of Wikipedia Till 2007, Wikipedia has characterized the growth in content and editors as being fundamentally exponential in nature.

Active editors analysis

Why network structure matters Disputed vs Undisputed articles We need to look at structural features of the network rather than just at their attribute measures. Varying edit histories and reverts due to variations in the bipolarity.

Objective: To try and analyze the future growth of Wikipedia network. Centered towards the individual articles vs contributors rather than whole network

Why previous works are not so reliable Most of the analysis was done between 2004-2008. Wikipedia network is different from typical social networks. Growth is purely dependent on contributors. Potential risk of core authors exhauting contributions.

Number of contributors editing a Wikipedia article Features considered Number of contributors editing a Wikipedia article Rather than number of edits of whole network and contributors active history,I consider contributors per article over one year span based on the latest data dumps and go back up to last five years for comparison purposes.

Features considered (contd) Key authors of the article Previous attempts were made to rank the authors based on their global contributions of the Wikipedia articles Identify the key authors of individual article based on the edit , revert history and information level presented. Find out how frequently the article creator becomes the key author

Features considered (contd) Frequency of set of authors having contributions to common Wikipedia articles.

Questions?