Summary, Working Group 4 Superconducting RF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WG D: HOM Couplers and Loads Summary G. Burt & J. Delayen.
Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
HOM Damper Hardware Considerations for Future Energy Frontier Circular Colliders S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY ,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
ESS SPOKE LINAC (WP4) Sebastien BOUSSON Guillaume OLRY ESS/SPL Meeting - Lund – 2010/07/01.
KAGEYAMA, T. Open Meeting for Proto-Collaboration March 19, 2008.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Thin Films for Superconducting Cavities HZB. Outline Introduction to Superconducting Cavities The Quadrupole Resonator Commissioning Outlook 2.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
Highly HOM-damped cavities S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University March Washington, DC FCC Week 2015.
ILC DR RF Cavity – D. Li DR Workshop, KEK, Japan 1 Design for the DR RF cavities and impedance issues Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Structure of the task 12.2 Claire Antoine Eucard2 WP12 DESY
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Summary of SRF WG, LCWS14 H. Hayano, A. Yamamoto.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
The RF system for FCC- ee A. Butterworth, CERN Thanks to: O. Brunner, R. Calaga, E. Jensen, E. Montesinos, F. Zimmermann (CERN), U. Wienands (SLAC)
I. Ben-Zvi Update Ilan Ben-Zvi for the Stony Brook, BNL and AES SPL teams Presented by Rama Calaga.
Group 6 / A RF Test and Properties of a Superconducting Cavity Mattia Checchin, Fabien Eozénou, Teresa Martinez de Alvaro, Szabina Mikulás, Jens Steckert.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
Longitudinal HOM damping estimations for SPL cavity. status W. Weingarten 26 July 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Mechanical Analysis Thermal Analysis Ø78 mm Ø106 mm L CLASSE facilities are operated by the Cornell Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics (LEPP) and.
Overview of ERL Projects: SRF Issues and Challenges Matthias Liepe Cornell University Matthias Liepe, TTC meeting, Beijing 2011 Slide 1 Overview of ERL.
Progress in unconventional RF structures Dr Graeme Burt Cockcroft Institute, Security Lancaster, Lancaster University.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Warren Schappert PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 10 March 2015.
The Beauty of an ERL for LHeC … and the interest to collaborate Erk Jensen, Ed. Ciapala (with lots of material provided by Rama Calaga, Joachim Tückmantel.
LFD and Microphonics Suppression for PIP-II Warren Schappert April 15, 2014.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for W. Schappert, Y.Pischalnikov, J.Holzbauer PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 15.
Microphonics Suppression in SRF cavities for Project X Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Project X Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, April 11, 2012.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
Cavities, Cryomodules, and Cryogenics Working Group 2 Summary Report Mark Champion, Sang-ho Kim Project X Collaboration Meeting April 12-14, 2011.
Review of options for crab cavities in LHC:
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
Peng Sha Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
WG-1 Session Cavity Performance Cryomodule Performance
TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF
Superconducting Cavities: Development/Production
704 MHz BNL3 cavity as an option for CEPC/FCC
Hosting Orsay Walid KAABI
BNL ERL and frequency choices
Double Quarter Wave Crab Cavity
Jiyuan Zhai ( IHEP ) TTC Meeting, JLAB, 6 Nov 2012
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
Future Thin Film Deposition Efforts at FNAL
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
ADS Accelerator Program in China
Overview of SRF system of Ring and Linac (1)
ERL2015 WG4: RF & superconducting RF for ERL
Matthias Liepe Zachary Conway CLASSE, Cornell University June 1, 2009
Resonance Control for Narrow-Bandwidth, SRF Applications
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
Presentation transcript:

Summary, Working Group 4 Superconducting RF I. Ben-Zvi and Frank Gerigk

Objectives of WG4 (SRF) A few guiding principles: Cavity performance in ERLs, operating in a CW mode, is dominated by cryogenic loss. RF power is dominated by stability and microphonics. High current CW operation requires exceptionally good HOM damping. Surprises are always possible…

Themes set for WG4 HOM damping and power coupling Advances in SRF surface performance Microphonics and resonance control Some additional cavity design and cryomodule performance.

Presentations in WG4 Power couplers & HOM dampers at CERN, Eric Montesinos (CERN) Coaxial couplers, Qiong Wu (BNL) Resonant Frequency Control at the Compact ERL in KEK, Takako Miura (KEK) High-Q R&D at FNAL Mattia Checchin (FNAL) Twin-Axis Elliptical Cavity, Frank Marhauser (Jlab) Cornell ERL CM performance, Fumio Furuta (Cornell) The potential of Nb/Cu technology for high beam current applications, Sarah Aull (CERN) Resonance control of the PIP-II SC cavities, Warren Schappert (FNAL) Microphonics analysis of ERL cryomodule, Fumio Furuta (Cornell) Development of an ERL RF Control System, Sebastian Orth (TU Darmstadt)

What we have heard (1) Power handling of 10’s of kW is necessary The art of high-power couplers is well advanced, yet its practice is very demanding. Coaxial couplers are particularly effective for lower frequencies, favorable for ERL. High-pass filters in HOM suppressors are relatively new and require further development Surprise: TE11 coaxial coupler has some great performance advantages.

What we have heard (2) The science and technology of better performing SRF surfaces, in terms of peak surface fields, surface resistance and operating temperature made great strides in recent times through nitrogen treatments and thin-film technology. These developments are particularly critical for CW ERLs.

What we have heard (3) Surprise: Progress and renewed interest in separated trajectory energy recovery cavities. Such a technique, once proven, holds enormous advantages in Injection (straight trajectory of low energy beam!) Beam dumping (No dispersion in waste beam, which allows dumping beams with high energy spread) Possible added suppression of BBU. Cavity #1 Cavity #2

What we have heard (4) Issues of microphonics and cavity resonance stability continue to challenge new SRF facilities. These issues are being addressed by feedback, but advanced thinking in the design of components and systems (cavities, cryomodules, helium delivery systems, cryogenic plants) is highly desirable.

What we recommend for future R&D Coaxial couplers, in particular high-pass, high-power HOM dampers and TE11 high-power fundamental power couplers. Nitrogen infusion and niobium sputtered on copper hold great promise.

Future R&D (2) Vigorous R&D on separated axis energy recovery cavities. Development of cryomodules designed with the goal of increasing stability of cavities. microphonics < 10 Hz p-to-p

We thank the participants and contributors!