Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):303-307. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv450 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 3. Entrance dose at the phantom for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):303-307. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv450 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 4. Entrance dose at the detector (left y-axis, bars) versus image quality (IQF, right y-axis, spheres) for the clinical protocol settings. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):303-307. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv450 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 1. Chest phantom. The chest phantom consists of foam, PMMA, aluminium and an image quality phantom (CDRAD). For dose measurements, a dosemeter was positioned on the wireless detector (entrance detector dose) or on top of the phantom (entrance phantom dose). From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):303-307. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv450 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figure 5. Entrance dose at the detector (left y-axis, bars) versus image quality (IQF, right y-axis, spheres) for the reference protocol settings. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):303-307. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv450 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com