Pirate’s Booty EDSGN 100, Section 008 Nina Brajovic, Mario Rombold, Ricky Tishler, Mayra Oyola October 16, 2015 Fig. 1 . Image of Prototype Nina

Table of Contents Problem Statement User Requirements Stakeholder Needs Assessment Specifications Pairwise Comparison Brainstorming Designs Concept Scoring Best Design Calculations Subsystem/System Description Cost Prototype Dimensions Prototype Results of Testing Summary and Conclusions Gantt Chart References Any Questions? Nina Here is the outline for all of the steps we took in our design process. We broke down the design process into various steps to fully represent how we came to our final prototype. Recognize the problem, need, opportunity Define Problem Space/Gather Info Specs Brainstorm Ideas Evaluate Ideas Analysis Test and Prototype Construction Communicate Design Solution

This is an investment opportunity to address a market need for a low cost water based game. Nina something about an investment opportunity capturing a market that’s been untapped graphic of We recognized the investment opportunity in creating a low cost water based game. There are many expensive water games including the Flyboard Pro Series that’s pictured on the screen. This specific model sells for $5399 $5399 Flyboard Pro Series Fig. 2. High Cost Market Water Game

While children prefer entertainment, parents value safety of the game. Fig. 3. Children Requirements Fig. 4. Parent Requirements Nina We first interviewed people of all age groups to narrow down our target audience. We found our target audience to be kids that are age 8-12 as well as their parents or guardians. After speaking to several kids under the age of 18, kids in the age range 8-12 were both capable of swimming and still being imaginative enough to have fun with the game. Most kids above 12 find little to no interest in such a game at that age. We created a detailed survey for kids and for their parents, and these are the results we found. Kids seemed to be more concerned with the entertainment factor while parents were mainly concerned with the safety of the product.

Stakeholders seem to have similar preferences regarding the requirements for the water game. TOP STAKEHOLDERS Dr. Thomas Colledge Users and Consumers Angel Investors Table 1. Stakeholders Nina Dr Colledge has supervised us along the way and taught us the process to create our designs. Ultimately we are pitching our design process and prototype to him. Users and Consumers are important because even if we create a good design, people must want to use it and buy it or else it is pointless Furthermore, angel investors are an important stakeholder because we would not be able to get our design into production and into sales without the financial backing and support We also surveyed these stakeholders along with our target audience to see what functionality preferences they valued most. Other stakeholders that we had to take into consideration are ... Garbage men/disposal crew regulators of the game (follows UL game regulations) makers of the game (low cost and not difficult to assemble) sales person (made it as marketable as possible) every person that has some stake in this Write top 2 or 3 stakeholders Mention “additional stakeholders which we took into account were…” 3 GRAPHS FOR EACH STAKEHOLDER SEE NINAS NOTES Fig. 5. Stakeholder Ratings

After evaluation of user requirements and constraints, specifications were formed to build a prototype. Price Must be less than $40 Safety Must meet UL standards for children 8-12 Weight Supports 90 pounds or less Environmentally Sustainable Must meet waste management standards Durability Remains intact after dropping from 2 feet 3 times mayra TALK ABOUT UL STANDARDS*** TALK ABOUT WASTE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS**** just say additional specs elaborate must be safe in safety spec on slide. Use UL regulations durability -- as measured by dropping from certain distance this many times Table 2. Specifications

Entertainment was found to be the predominant specification to the stakeholders. Mario Table 3. Design Matrix

There are multiple designs that satisfy the problem statement. Mario

We ranked each idea according to specific criteria in order to determine the best design. Mario Table 4. Concept Rating

The Ring Skis were found to be the best design after evaluating the specific criteria. Mayra isometric and three views of final design solidworks Fig. 1 . Image of Prototype

We calculated the buoyancy and found that our design does float with a 77 kg person. Nina First we calculated the downward force of a 77kg person and the raft. We then calculated the depth that the raft would sink under the water if the person put all of their weight into one foot on one side of the raft. To find the buoyancy force we first calculated the surface area and used it in the equation for the buoyant force. We found that the buoyant force was larger than the downward force of the person and the raft, so ultimately our model would float.

The object of the game is to walk the treasure across the ocean! Ricky After the first half of the game described by the previous team, the participants make a handoff of the “treasure” they sorted in the first few minutes of the game to the member of the team who is going to then try to carry the “treasure” across the length of the pool where the game is taking place. Describing the game, why is it going to be fun? This is the big picture of the game Put in pictures from testing Fig. 6. Final Product

An important constraint was keeping the design under $40. NAME QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST OSB Plywood 1 $9.35 Paracord $2.97 Gorilla Tape $8.98 Homer Bucket Intex Transparent Tube - Pink 5 $1.75 $8.75 GRAND TOTAL $33.02 Ricky The supplies we used for our prototype we chose specifically to satisfy the constraint assigned to us of producing it under $40. the materials we used in production were plywood, paracord. gorilla tape, a bucket and 5 inner tubes. table of costs (Name, quantity, unit cost, total cost) Table 5. Price Sheet

The prototype dimensions were designed to fit the desired age range. Mayra isometric and three views of design with dimensions detailed design drawings from solidworks rickys size one approximately half the size of rickys Fig. 7. Dimensioned Product

The final design has been scaled to size to be tested by a larger individual than the marketed ages. Mayra pictures of our real life prototype Fig. 8. Final Product

Testing our prototype allows us to identify ways in which we can improve our model. REVISIONS Cover front and back edges of plywood with tape Inflate inner tubes more Adjust string length between feet Reinforce design with tape Table 6. Revisions Ricky A few last minute revisions we made demonstrated their necessity during our test run, where the tubes sank a little more than anticipated so we decided to fill them each with more air. we also decided to use more tape in order to increase durability and make it safer by removing some of the edges. also we decided to decrease the amount of paracord between the feet to help increase the stability. identifying what worked, what didn’t work, and what future revisions are going to be pictures of revisions

We have created a fun and safe game that targets an untapped market for low cost water games. Mario what’s good about this? Its fun, cost effective, how to sell it Fig. 9. Users

The project tasks were distributed among group members based off of our time constraint. Table 7. Gantt Chart Ricky This is a picture of our gantt chart,which helped outline the engineering design process,which evenly distributed and managed the time of everything we needed to do before our presentation. gantt chart Table 7. Gantt Chart

References People: Average Weight of 12 Year Olds: Figure 2: Figure 9: Thomas Colledge Parents and Children Angel Investors Average Weight of 12 Year Olds: "The Expectation Of Stature In Boys At 13 Years Of Age." The Lancet 156.4024 (1900): 1086-087. Www.cdc.gov. Web. Nchs. 2 to 20 Years: Girls, Stature-for-age and Weight-for-age Percentiles (n.d.): n. pag. Www.cdc.gov. Web. 15 Oct. 2015. Figure 2: "Hover Board Prague." Amazing Adventures. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2015. Figure 9: "Water Safety Information | Ultra Modern Pool and Patio." Ultra Modern Pool and Patio. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2015. Ricky these are the people and websites we chose to use to help us gather information on our design, constraints and marketability. People Websites (average weight of 12 year olds) cdc website

Questions, Comments, Concerns?