WP1 INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERFORMER WP2 INTRODUCTION 13th of September 2013 CSTB Sophia Antipolis, France.
Advertisements

Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval WP1. Project Management.
1 Information Systems Development (ISD) Systems Development Life Cycle Overview of Analysis Phase Overview of Design Phase CP2236: Information Systems.
Chapter 2 – Software Processes
GENIUS T4 - September 2014 GENIUS T4 Teleconference X. Luri.
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
2 nd Steering Committee Meeting October 2008, Athens and Aegina.
1 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 WP2 “Design and implementation of infrastructure capturing.
Example Template for Project Presentation
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
Kick of WP3 Steps towards building Oxford, first project meeting :30 am – 11:15 am.
Chapter 2 – Software Processes Lecture 1 Chapter 2 Software Processes1.
Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
Recent Results of JCA-NID and TSAG Byoung Nam LEE HyoungJun KIM ETRI, Korea.
CSIS 4850: CS Senior Project – Spring 2009 CSIS 4850: Senior Project Spring 2009 Object-Oriented Design.
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
GEO Work Programme 2016 WGISS#40 HARWELL (UKSA) 28 SEP - 02 OCT 2015 MIRKO ALBANI, ESA.
WP7 - Dissemination of Results & Exploitation
WP2 - INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework
Task 4.2 Grid Coordination & DR Activation Module
User Profiling and Ambient UIs
CompSci 280 S Introduction to Software Development
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
WP3 Local Control and Automation Hub,
WP4 - INERTIA Aggregators Monitoring, Management and Control Hub
WP3: D3.1 status, pending comments and next steps
[WP1] T1.2 User and Business Requirements
[WP1] T1.2 User and Business Requirements
An example of how to develop a dynamic business model
EC project periodic and continuous reporting
WP3 INERTIA Local Control and Automation Hub
WP2 INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework
Presenter name affiliation
Dissemination Activities Report
Chapter 5 – System Modeling
WP3 - INERTIA Local Control and Automation Hub
Project Management Status
Project Management Status
WP2 INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework
WP2 - INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework
WP1 - INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture
Task 5.2 INERTIA Simulation Test Suite TECNALIA Joseba Jimeno
WP3 Local Control and Automation Hub,
WP6 Pilot Set-up, Model Calibration and Assessment
EOB Methodology Overview
Task 5.2 INERTIA Simulation Test Suite TECNALIA Joseba Jimeno
WP5 INERTIA Integration & Lab Testing
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
ESCM – Chapter 1.
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Workshop on the Validation of Waste Statistics
Draft Article 8 MSFD assessment guidance
Product Development Scenario Overview
OBJECT-ORIENTED APPROACH TO OFFICIAL STATISTICS
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
Informal consultation on highlights of UNDP’s Integrated budget estimates, June 2013 Figures are provisional estimates subject to change.
EER Assurance December 2018
ESS.VIP VALIDATION An ESS.VIP project for mutual benefits
CS310 Software Engineering Lecturer Dr.Doaa Sami
NSS Instrument Project Tollgate Coordinator
VC Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
WG Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
Software Architecture
System Reengineering Restructuring or rewriting part or all of a system without changing its functionality Applicable when some (but not all) subsystems.
Proposal on TSC policy for ONAP release Maintenance
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

WP1 INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture Task 1.4 – Architectural Design - Functional and Technical Specifications CERTH/ITI

MS3 “INERTIA Provisional Architecture available” T1.4 Overview Task 1.4 – “Architectural Design - Functional and Technical Specifications” Involved Partners: CERTH/ITI 5 ENG 4 TECHALIA 2 CNet ALMENDE TUK HYPERTECH PPC 1 ENELSI We are here Deliverable D1.3 “INERTIA Framework Architecture including functional elements and technical specifications” (Report, Restricted, M12 September 2013) Milestone MS3 “INERTIA Provisional Architecture available” (M12 September 2013)

Today’s meeting CERTH will shortly present efforts achieved so far towards : Defining INERTIA overall architectural and architectural elements Preparing documentation needed for deliverable D1.3 Go through each deliverable chapter Discuss any architectural issues still pending Try to close any open issues and come to decisions Define and agree on contributions expected by each partner Define a time-planning for document completion + revision

Defining INERTIA Architecture During the last 4 months (after Bilbao Meeting) great progress has been achieved towards defining INERTIA Architecture & respective architectural elements Decided on conceptual architecture and local & global control hub distribution Process of Holistic Flexibility calculation within the respective agents of the Local Control Hub were analysed Multi-Agent system architecture was introduced by ALMENDE Decided on final list of components and responsibilities per partner Aggregator control hub was thoroughly analysed between responsible partners

Deliverable Sections: 1.Introduction – 2.Methodology Nearly finalised Some feedback already received by partners CERTH with revise this section towards its completion

Deliverable Sections: 3.Conceptual Architecture Almost complete Figure refined (next slide) CERTH will further refine the figure to reflect some changes in component naming Aggregator Hub MAS and other components positioning version will be circulated for feedback/comments CERTH will specify description of major conceptual elements that need refinement by corresponding partners

Deliverable Sections: 3.Conceptual Architecture

Deliverable Sections: 4. Structural View – Component Diagrams Mostly covered – some refinements pending Initial description of all components have already been provided ALL PARTNERS - Changes may be needed following discussions during last telco (3 Sep) on communication between components, use of IAM etc. Diagrams harmonization based on Visio sample from CERTH Still waiting for final list of Requirements (deliverable D1.2) to be addressed by each component

Deliverable Sections: 4. Structural View – Component Diagrams Meeting discussion: Local Control Hub - Multi-Agent System Topology as provided by ALMENDE through 2 different diagrams: a component diagram, highlighting dependencies between components a diagram showing agent topology and attached components Positioning of Event Handler (in Middleware or represented by an agent?) Other interfacing issues need to be discussed ? (eg. IAM use for exchange of information)

Deliverable Sections: 4.Structural View – Component Diagrams Local Control Hub / MAS Component & Agent topology Diagram

Deliverable Sections: 5. Development View Still missing contributions ALL PARTNERS –revise section and identify inputs needed for each responsible components ALL PARTNERS – Specify use of Existing Software / Platforms etc. ALMENDE proposed to provide an overview section here, giving a high-level overview of major principles of MAS architecture CERTH will refine introductory sections

Deliverable Sections: 6. Deployment View Still missing contributions ALMENDE has provided initial contribution on MAS deployment CERTH will coordinate a holistic deployment approach, preceding separate deployment sections ALL PARTNERS – revise section and identify inputs needed for each responsible components CERTH will refine introductory sections

Deliverable Sections: 7. Dynamic View Use Cases/Sequence Diagrams Needs revision on some parts – mainly to commonly agree on the information flow between components Contributions and feedback is needed by all partners, mainly focusing on the correct positioning and information exchange with other component Still waiting for final list of User & Requirements definition (deliverable D1.2) to be included in the corresponding UCs CERTH and HYPERTECH will further refine section and deliver most of the work

Deliverable Sections: 7. Dynamic View – Use Cases/Sequence Diagrams Meeting discussion: Use Case 6.1 - Real time Control Operation of each Local Hub Covers most of Local Hub’s real-time operation – decision making from Holistic Flexibility component after consulting all LCH components Needs to be checked in parallel with agent-approach provided by ALMENDE As already identified by TECNALIA, missing DER Modeling interactions

Deliverable Sections: 7. Dynamic View – Use Cases/Sequence Diagrams

Deliverable Sections: 7. Dynamic View – Use Cases/Sequence Diagrams

Deliverable Sections: 8. Detailed Specification 8.Core Architectural Elements Detailed Specification Still missing contributions from most partners CERTH and TECNALIA has already added input in this section Input / Output sections need to be tranferred here from component view ALL PARTNERS need to add relevant information here CERTH will revise the introductory paragraphs

T1.4 Next Steps Planning for next efforts ALL PARTNERS need to provide contributions pending, as already identified one week after the meeting (by 18/9) Plan a first telco ~ 19-20/9, to update status on deliverable work CERTH will provide a refined – close to final version by 23/9, including contributions received and work addressed to CERTH Organise more telcos (as needed) to quickly decide and forward any issues that may arise Provide final document on time for Peer Review (as decided based on overall deliverable planning)