The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Syllogisms Formal Reasoning.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
Logic. To Think Clearly Use reason, instead of relying on instinct alone What is Logic? – “the art of reasoning” – The study of truth – The ethics of.
Deduction Induction Fallacies.  The basic aim of deductive reasoning is to start with some assumption or premise and extract from it a conclusion—a logical.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Other Info on Making Arguments
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003.
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING
Deductive reasoning.
The ubiquity of logic One common example of reasoning  If I take an umbrella, I can prevent getting wet by rain  I don’t want to get myself wet by rain.
RESEARCH IN EDUCATION Chapter I. Explanations about the Universe Power of the gods Religious authority Challenge to religious dogma Metacognition: Thinking.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
1 Chapter 7 Propositional and Predicate Logic. 2 Chapter 7 Contents (1) l What is Logic? l Logical Operators l Translating between English and Logic l.
Time 2 hr No choice 1st six week course will be for the paper (including teasers) The 1st six week outlines attached in form of slides.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
Formal Operations and Rationality. Formal Operations Using the real vs. the possible Inductive vs. deductive reasoning –Inductive: Specific to general,
The Science of Good Reasons
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Definition: “reasoning from known premises, or premises presumed to be true, to a certain conclusion.” In contrast, most everyday arguments involve inductive.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Unit 1 – Foundations of Logic Reasoning and Arguments.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
The construction of a formal argument
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making May 28, 2003.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
Evaluating Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Arguments.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Disjunctive Syllogism
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 8: Recognizing Arguments
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
The Ontological Argument
Deductive & Inductive Forms of Reasoning
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
The Ontological Argument
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Logic Problems and Questions
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
How to Write an Argument
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
How to Think Logically.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Identifying & Ordering
Presentation transcript:

The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic

Proposition Statement in a sentence that can be right and wrong Example: Everyone can be a member of parliament Yudhoyono is the Indonesian President

Sentence Collection of words according to a grammar and has its meaning

Premise Premise is a proposition in argument upon which inference is based. This proposition provides grounds or reasons for the conclusion premise indicators are words and phrases (like “because’, “since”) that normally signal that what follows them are statement serving as premises

Major Premise Major premise is in a standard form of syllogism, the premise that contains the major term Major term is the term that occurs as the predicate term of the conclusion in a standard-form syllogism

Minor Premis In the standar form of syllogism, the premise that contains the minor term. Minor term is the term that occurs as the subject term of the conclusion in a standard-form syllogism

(source: Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation) Predicable Quality that describes something: a quality or attribute by which somebody or something can be described (source: Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation)

Argument Argument is any group of propositions of which (the conclusion) is claimed to follow from the others ( the premises) which are regarded as providing support for the truth of that one

Conclusion Conclusion is the proposition to which the other proposition in the argument are claimed to give support, or for which they are given as reason.

Conclusion indicators Therefore, hence, thus, so accordingly, in consequence, consequently, proves that, as aresult, for this reason, for these reasons, it follows that, we may infer, I conclude that, we may infer, I conclude that, which shows that, which means that, which entails that, which implies that, which allows us to infer that, which points to the conclusion that

Syllogism Syllogism is any deductive argument in which a conclusion is inferred from two premises Syllogistic argument is any argument that is either a standard form categorical syllogism or can be reformulated as a standard-form categorical syllogism without any change of meaning

Deduction Deduction is one of the two major types of argument traditionally distinguished, the other being induction. A deductive argument claims to provide conclusive grounds for its conclusion; if it does so it is valid, if it is does not, it is invalid

Induction induction is one of the two major types of argument traditionally distinguished, the other being deduction. An inductive argument claims that its premiseses give only some degree of probability, but not certainty, to its conclusion

Fallacy Fallacy is a mistake in reasoning; a type of argument that may seem to be correct, but that proves upon examination not to be so. Fallacies may be formal or informal. Informal fallacy is logical mistakes common in ordinary discourse Fallacy of ambiguity is those informal fallacies committed when the inference to the conclusion relies upon shifting meanings within the course of an argument Fallacies of relevance is thos informal fallacies committed when the premises of an argument are not relevant to its conclusion and therefore cannot establish the truth of that conclusion

Inference Inference is a process by which one proposition is arrived at and affirmed on the basis of some other proposition or prositions.

Exercises The light that we see from distant galaxies left them millions of years ago, and in the case of that most distant object that we have seen, the light left some eight thousand million years ago. Thus when we look at the universe, we are seeing it as it was in the past

Exercises 2 A Gray surface looks red if we have been looking at a blue-green one; plain paper feels smooth if we have been feeling sandpaper of rough if we have feeling plate glass; and tap water tastes sweet if we have been eating artichokes. Some part of what we call red or smooth or sweet must therefore be in the eyes or fingertips or tounge of the beholder, feeler, or taster.