That’s It! I. Recognizing Arguments II. Analyzing Arguments

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Passage Based Reading for the Sat

Advertisements

Senior Project Outline Turn to page 19 in your handbook, take out your notebook.

Arguments Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions) Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions)

Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.

Statistical syllogisms...and why generalizations aren’t always accurate.

Effective Math Questioning

LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Historical Thinking Skills

Science and Engineering Practices

Coach J. What’s the big deal?  Learning takes place when you produce knowledge not re produce it.  Recognize a higher-level thinking question: Colleges.

Critical Thinking: Close Reading of Texts Presented by Dr. Cheryl Torok Fleming November, 2013 Based on Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:

Writing and Sequencing Assignments Christopher J. Bilodeau, Ph.D. Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, USA

Number Sense Standards Measurement and Geometry Statistics, Data Analysis and Probability CST Math 6 Released Questions Algebra and Functions 0 Questions.

January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.

Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part II: Types of Arguments.

Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2004 University of Pittsburgh 1 Principles of Learning: Accountable Talk SM Accountability to the Learning Community.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.

National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.

Funded by the Library of Congress.

© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.

Introduction to Categorical Logic PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 18, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.

Critical Thinking The Student Learning Advisory Service Gina May.

Evaluate Inductive Reasoning and Spot Inductive Fallacies

Multiplication Find the missing value x __ = 32.

Reading Comprehension

Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary

Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning

RI.xx.1-3 Key Ideas and Details

IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.

85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”

Strategies for Success

Are you ready for the Literacy Test?

Analyze, evaluate, and conquer

Strategies for Success

GroupSystems Insights/Guidelines

Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.

Journal The arguments around curriculum – or what skills and material students are being taught – are common in almost every level of bureaucratic education.

Critical Thinking Skills

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.

Command of Evidence Qs What do they look like?

Patterns of Thinking and Writing

Lesson 1.1 How can you analyze data?

World War II Blog Assignment

Learning Target: I can add an effective conclusion to my literary analysis essay. Do Now: After writing the bulk of your literary analysis essay, why is.

Critical Thinking and Argumentation

SEP S.1A.7 Construct and analyze scientific arguments to support claims, explanations, or designs using evidence from observations, data, or informational.

On Fallacy and language

Introduction to Ethics Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2)

II. Analyzing Arguments

Historical Thinking Skills

Irony and logical fallacy

Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.

Assessments for “Remembering” Outcomes

Example Make x the subject of the formula

Use the distributive rule in arithmetic 5c

Critical Reading: Comprehension and Extended Reasoning

Learn to identify and evaluate expressions.

AICE General Paper What IS this class?.

Verbs A-C Verbs C-D Verbs D-I Verbs I-R Verbs S-V

Starting out with formal logic

Critical Thinking Skills

Presentation transcript:

That’s It! I. Recognizing Arguments II. Analyzing Arguments We’ve discussed the basics of: I. Recognizing Arguments II. Analyzing Arguments III. Evaluating Arguments IV. Constructing Arguments

Beyond the Basics There’s more to learn, if you want: Recognizing Arguments: Distinguishing between arguments and explanations. Analyzing Arguments: Recognizing more inference indicator expressions. Employing various tests to identify dependent reasons. Identifying and summarizing the main points in longer texts that may contain multiple, interrelated, arguments. Evaluating Arguments: Assessing special kinds of premises. Assessing inferences by constructing counterexamples, identifying missing subconclusions, identifying hidden assumptions, spotting informal fallacies, and using symbolic logic. Constructing Arguments: Employing special subject-specific research techniques. These extras are are nice but they aren’t necessary. The basics are enough to let you recognize, analyze, evaluate, and construct literally any argument no matter how complex.

All you need to do is practice.

All you need to do is practice. Have fun. Be nice. 