© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Instructional materials

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions

Nilai rata-rata total validitas

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

S. No. Product Name yield content

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. The Structure of the Basic Science and Technology Curriculum

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 5. Physics Teachers Suggestions for Improving Teaching and Learning of Senior Physics (N = 98) Category N % Improved salary and support 21 21.4 Curriculum content and assessment requirements 30 30.6 Improved physics and mathematics tuition at junior level 15 15.3 Professional development on content knowledge More qualified physics teachers 17 17.3 Isaac Buabeng et al. The Lack of Physics Teachers: “Like a Bath with the Plug out and the Tap half on”. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, 721-730. doi:10.12691/education-3-6-9 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.