Numerical Methods Part: Cholesky and Decomposition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Methods Fourier Transform Pair Part: Frequency and Time Domain
Advertisements

Linear Algebra Applications in Matlab ME 303. Special Characters and Matlab Functions.
4/22/ LU Decomposition Electrical Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw Transforming.
Internet Chess-Like Game and Simultaneous Linear Equations.
MATH 685/ CSI 700/ OR 682 Lecture Notes
LU Factorization LU-factorization Matrix factorization Forward substitution Back substitution.
Systems of Linear Equations
Chapter 9 Gauss Elimination The Islamic University of Gaza
ECIV 301 Programming & Graphics Numerical Methods for Engineers Lecture 14 Elimination Methods.
Numerical Methods Newton’s Method for One - Dimensional Optimization - Theory
Numerical Methods Golden Section Search Method - Theory
Numerical Methods Discrete Fourier Transform Part: Discrete Fourier Transform
LU Decomposition 1. Introduction Another way of solving a system of equations is by using a factorization technique for matrices called LU decomposition.
Advanced Computer Graphics Spring 2014 K. H. Ko School of Mechatronics Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology.
SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS MATRIX SOLUTIONS TO LINEAR SYSTEMS
Presentation by: H. Sarper
Solving Scale Linear Systems (Example system continued) Lecture 14 MA/CS 471 Fall 2003.
Elliptic Partial Differential Equations - Introduction
Introduction to Numerical Analysis I MATH/CMPSC 455 PA=LU.
Simpson Rule For Integration.
Numerical Methods Part: Cholesky and Decomposition
Numerical Methods Part: Simpson Rule For Integration.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 5 Systems and Matrices Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.
Numerical Methods Fast Fourier Transform Part: Informal Development of Fast Fourier Transform
Numerical Methods Multi Dimensional Direct Search Methods - Theory
Numerical Methods Fast Fourier Transform Part: Theoretical Development of Fast Fourier Transform
Numerical Methods Continuous Fourier Series Part: Continuous Fourier Series
Lecture 8 Matrix Inverse and LU Decomposition
Lecture 7 - Systems of Equations CVEN 302 June 17, 2002.
11/17/ Introduction to Partial Differential Equations Transforming Numerical.
Numerical Methods Part: False-Position Method of Solving a Nonlinear Equation
Numerical Methods Newton’s Method for One - Dimensional Optimization - Theory
Chapter 9 Gauss Elimination The Islamic University of Gaza
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems Prof. Hao Zhu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
 The Sinkhorn-Knopp Algorithm and Fixed Point Problem  Solutions for 2 × 2 and special n × n cases  Circulant matrices for 3 × 3 case  Ongoing work.
Numerical Methods Multidimensional Gradient Methods in Optimization- Theory
1/30/ Elliptic Partial Differential Equations – Lieberman Method – Part 1 of 2 Elliptic Partial Differential.
2/13/ Elliptic Partial Differential Equations - Introduction Transforming.
3/1/ LU Decomposition Computer Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw Transforming.
Numerical Methods Part: False-Position Method of Solving a Nonlinear Equation
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems Prof. Hao Zhu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Unit #1 Linear Systems Fall Dr. Jehad Al Dallal.
Numerical Methods Multidimensional Gradient Methods in Optimization- Example
Lecture 9 Numerical Analysis. Solution of Linear System of Equations Chapter 3.
Matrices Introduction.
7.7 Determinants. Cramer’s Rule
Spring Dr. Jehad Al Dallal
5 Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices
Numerical Analysis Lecture12.
We will be looking for a solution to the system of linear differential equations with constant coefficients.
Linear Algebra Lecture 15.
Numerical Methods Multi Dimensional Direct Search Methods - Example
Chapter 10: Solving Linear Systems of Equations
Chapter 1 Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices
Elliptic Partial Differential Equations – Direct Method
Chemical Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw
Systems of equations When we have two equations with two unknowns we solve them using the methods from simultaneous equations. Either by elimination.
Numerical Analysis Lecture 16.
Numerical Analysis Lecture14.
Numerical Analysis Lecture13.
Elliptic Partial Differential Equations – Gauss-Seidel Method
Numerical Analysis Lecture10.
Numerical Methods Golden Section Search Method - Example
Numerical Methods Newton’s Method for One -Dimensional Optimization - Example
Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering Lectures 13 – 14, Tuesday 8th November 2016 DR TANIA STATHAKI READER (ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR)
Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering Lectures 9, Friday 28th October 2016 DR TANIA STATHAKI READER (ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR) IN SIGNAL.
Major: All Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Numerical Analysis Lecture11.
Ax = b Methods for Solution of the System of Equations (ReCap):
Presentation transcript:

Numerical Methods Part: Cholesky and Decomposition http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu 1

2 For more details on this topic Go to http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu Click on Keyword 2

You are free to Share – to copy, distribute, display and perform the work to Remix – to make derivative works 3

Under the following conditions Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. 4

Chapter 04.09: Cholesky and Decomposition Lecture # 1 Chapter 04.09: Cholesky and Decomposition Major: All Engineering Majors Authors: Duc Nguyen http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu Numerical Methods for STEM undergraduates 03/19/13 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu 5

Introduction (1) where = known coefficient matrix, with dimension = known right-hand-side (RHS) vector = unknown vector. 1 6 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Symmetrical Positive Definite (SPD) SLE A matrix can be considered as SPD if either of the following conditions is satisfied: (a) If each and every determinant of sub-matrix is positive, or.. (b) If for any given vector As a quick example, let us make a test a test to see if the given matrix is SPD? 7 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Symmetrical Positive Definite (SPD) SLE Based on criteria (a): The given matrix is symmetrical, because Furthermore, 8 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence is SPD. 9 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Based on criteria (b): For any given vector , one computes 10 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

hence matrix is SPD 11 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Step 1: Matrix Factorization phase (2) (3) Multiplying two matrices on the right-hand-side (RHS) of Equation (3), one gets the following 6 equations (4) (5) 12

Step 1.1: Compute the numerator of Equation (7), such as (6) (7) Step 1.1: Compute the numerator of Equation (7), such as Step 1.2 If is an off-diagonal term (say ) then (See Equation (7)). Else, if is a diagonal term (that is, ), then (See Equation (6)) 13 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

As a quick example, one computes: (8) Thus, for computing , one only needs to use the (already factorized) data in columns and of , respectively. 14 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Figure 1: Cholesky Factorization for the term 15 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Step 2: Forward Solution phase Substituting Equation (2) into Equation (1), one gets: (9) Let us define: (10) Then, Equation (9) becomes: (11) (12) 16 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

From the 2nd row of Equation (12), one gets (13) From the 2nd row of Equation (12), one gets (14) Similarly (15) 17 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

In general, from the row of Equation (12), one has (16) 18 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Step 3: Backward Solution phase As a quick example, one has (See Equation (10)): (17) 19 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

From the last (or ) row of Equation (17), one has hence (18) Similarly: (19) and (20) 20 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

In general, one has: (21) 21 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Multiplying the three matrices on the RHS of (22) For example, (23) Multiplying the three matrices on the RHS of Equation (23), one obtains the following formulas for the “diagonal” , and “lower-triangular” matrices: 22 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(24) (25) 23 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Step1: Factorization phase (22, repeated) Step 2: Forward solution and diagonal scaling phase Substituting Equation (22) into Equation (1), one gets: (26) Let us define: 24 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Then Equation (26) becomes: Also, define: (29) (30) Then Equation (26) becomes: 25 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(31) (32) 26 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Step 3: Backward solution phase 27 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(Cholesky algorithms) Numerical Example 1 (Cholesky algorithms) Solve the following SLE system for the unknown vector ? where 28 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Solution: The factorized, upper triangular matrix can be computed by either referring to Equations (6-7), or looking at Figure 1, as following: 29 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

30 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Thus, the factorized matrix 31 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The forward solution phase, shown in Equation (11), becomes: 32 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

33 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The backward solution phase, shown in Equation (10), becomes: 34 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

35 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence 36 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Numerical Example 2 ( Algorithms) Using the same data given in Numerical Example 1, find the unknown vector by algorithms? Solution: The factorized matrices and can be computed from Equation (24), and Equation (25), respectively. 37 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

38 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

39 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

40 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence and 41 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The forward solution shown in Equation (31), becomes: (32, repeated) 42 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence 43 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The diagonal scaling phase, shown in Equation (29), becomes 44 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

or Hence 45 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The backward solution phase can be found by referring to Equation (27) (28, repeated) 46 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence 47 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Hence 48 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Re-ordering Algorithms For Minimizing Fill-in Terms [1,2]. During the factorization phase (of Cholesky, or Algorithms ), many “zero” terms in the original/given matrix will become “non-zero” terms in the factored matrix . These new non-zero terms are often called as “fill-in” terms (indicated by the symbol ) It is, therefore, highly desirable to minimize these fill-in terms , so that both computational time/effort and computer memory requirements can be substantially reduced. 49 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

For example, the following matrix and vector are given: (33) (34) 50 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The Cholesky factorization matrix , based on the original matrix (see Equation 33) and Equations (6-7), or Figure 1, can be symbolically computed as: (35) 51 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

IPERM (new equation #) = {old equation #} (36) such as, for this particular example: (37) 52 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Using the above results (see Equation 37), one will be able to construct the following re-arranged matrices: (38) (39) and 53 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

In the original matrix (shown in Equation 33), Remarks: In the original matrix (shown in Equation 33), the nonzero term (old row 1, old column 2) = 7 will move to new location of the new matrix (new row 6, new column 5) = 7, etc. The non zero term (old row 3, old column 3) = 88 will move to (new row 4, new column 4) = 88, etc. The value of (old row 4) = 70 will be moved to (or located at) (new row 3) = 70, etc 54 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Now, one would like to solve the following modified system of linear equations (SLE) for (40) rather than to solve the original SLE (see Equation1). The original unknown vector can be easily recovered from and ,shown in Equation (37). 55 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

The factorized matrix can be “symbolically” computed from as (by referring to either Figure 1, or Equations 6-7): (41) 56 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

4. On-Line Chess-Like Game For Reordering/Factorized Phase [4]. Figure 2 A Chess-Like Game For Learning to Solve SLE. 57 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(A)Teaching undergraduate/HS students the process how to use the reordering output IPERM(-), see Equations (36-37) for converting the original/given matrix , see Equation (33), into the new/modified matrix , see Equation (38). This step is reflected in Figure 2, when the “Game Player” decides to swap node (or equation) (say ) with another node (or equation ) , and click the “CONFIRM” icon! 58 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

Since node is currently connected to nodes hence swapping node with the above nodes will “NOT” change the number/pattern of “Fill-in” terms. However, if node is swapped with node then the fill-in terms pattern may change (for better or worse)! 59 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(B) Helping undergraduate/HS students to understand the “symbolic” factorization” phase, by symbolically utilizing the Cholesky factorized Equations (6-7). This step is illustrated in Figure 2, for which the “game player” will see (and also hear the computer animated sound, and human voice), the non-zero terms (including fill-in terms) of the original matrix to move to the new locations in the new/modified matrix . 60 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

(C) Helping undergraduate/HS students to understand the “numerical factorization” phase, by numerically utilizing the same Cholesky factorized Equations (6-7). (D) Teaching undergraduate engineering/science students and even high-school (HS) students to “understand existing reordering concepts”, or even to “discover new reordering algorithms” 61 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

5. Further Explanation On The Developed Game In the above Chess-Like Game, which is available on-line [4], powerful features of FLASH computer environments [3], such as animated sound, human voice, motions, graphical colors etc… have all been incorporated and programmed into the developed game-software for more appealing to game players/learners. 62 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

In the developed “Chess-Like Game”, fictitious monetary (or any kind of ‘scoring system”) is rewarded (and broadcasted by computer animated human voice) to game players, based on how he/she swaps the node (or equation) numbers, and consequently based on how many fill-in terms occurred. In general, less fill-in terms introduced will result in more rewards! 63 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

3. Based on the original/given matrix , and existing re-ordering algorithms (such as the Reverse Cuthill- Mckee, or RCM algorithms [1-2]) the number of fill-in terms can be computed (using RCM algorithms). This internally generated information will be used to judge how good the players/learners are, and/or broadcast “congratulations message” to a particular player who discovers new “chess-like move” (or, swapping node) strategies which are even better than RCM algorithms! 64 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

4. Initially, the player(s) will select the matrix size ( , or larger is recommended), and the percentage (50%, or larger is suggested) of zero-terms (or sparsity of the matrix). Then, “START Game” icon will be clicked by the player. 65 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

5. The player will then CLICK one of the selected node (or equation) numbers appearing on the computer screen. The player will see those nodes which are connected to node (based on the given/generated matrix ). The player then has to decide to swap node with one of the possible node 66 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

After confirming the player’s decision, the outcomes/ results will be announced by the computer animated human voice, and the monetary-award will (or will NOT) be given to the players/learners, accordingly. In this software, a maximum of $1,000,000 can be earned by the player, and the “exact dollar amount” will be INVERSELY proportional to the number of fill-in terms occurred (as a consequence of the player’s decision on how to swap node with another node ). 67 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

6. The next player will continue to play, with his/her move (meaning to swap the node with the node) based on the current best non-zero terms pattern of the matrix. 68 http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu

THE END http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu 69

70 Acknowledgement This instructional power point brought to you by Numerical Methods for STEM undergraduate http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu Committed to bringing numerical methods to the undergraduate 70

For instructional videos on other topics, go to http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu/videos/ This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant # 0717624. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

The End - Really