Controls & Monitoring in MICE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Advertisements

MICE Top-Level Project Schedule Step IV Step V Step VI Revision date: 17 th June,
1 MICE PM Report General Update –Phase I civil engineering –R5.2 in June –Phase II design work –Phase II hardware –A few questions –Schedule, milestones.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
1 Configuration Database Review David Forrest University of Glasgow RAL :: 1 st June 2009.
Project Report Paul Drumm CM15, FNAL June MICE Schedule Overview First beam September/October 2007 –Shutdown from January 2007 –Eight months for.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 7 October   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM19.
Computing Panel Discussion Continued Marco Apollonio, Linda Coney, Mike Courthold, Malcolm Ellis, Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Pierrick Hanlet, Henry Nebrensky.
Pierrick Hanlet MICO June 6, 2011 MICE Operations Manager Report.
MOM - M.ApollonioAccel. R&D/Physics and IADR - RAL - 19/3/ Summary of MICE operations – 14/15 March 2008 AIMS - establish MICE beamline in ISIS synchrotron.
1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.
MICE Online Linda R. Coney UCR MICE CM30 Oxford July 2011.
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Online Summary o Detector DAQ o Controls And Monitoring o Online Data Base o Bottom Lines Jean-Sebastien.
17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.
SOFTWARE & COMPUTING Durga Rajaram MICE PROJECT BOARD Nov 24, 2014.
1 MICE CM32 Summary Scheduling and planning; aims for this year Schedule update Main schedule drivers Keeping us on schedule Comment on Steps V & VI Detail.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
1 Operations Summary L. Coney – UCR MICE CM34 – Oct 2012.
1 Operations Overview L. Coney UC Riverside MICE CM32 – Glasgow – June 2012.
1 MICE Running L. Coney – UCR MPB – 31 Oct Coney - MPB - 31 Oct 2012Outline Current Running Current Running Shift personnel training Shift personnel.
Linda Coney MC VC May 19, 2011 MICE Operations Manager Report.
Status of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Yagmur Torun Illinois Institute of Technology April 1, 2013.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Electrical Integration CM38 Steve Griffiths & Ian Mullacrane.
MICE magnetic measurements: AFC considerations Alain Blondel see a previous discussion for reference in CM35 (Feb 2013 slides by V. Blackmore, A. Blondel.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
1 MICE Collaboration meeting at Berkeley 9 – 12 February 2005 Integrated Design & Safety Review Presented by Wing Lau & Paul Drumm.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 21 september   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment BRIEF STATUS OF MICE.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
MICE RF Workshop Alain Blondel MICE = critical R&D for neutrino factory and muon collider 1 neutrino factory: accelerate muons and store to produce.
Controls & Monitoring Overview J. Leaver 03/06/2009.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
MICE FAC open session Alain Blondel 1   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment.
MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.
Controls & Monitoring Status Update J. Leaver 05/11/2009.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
OsC mtg 24/4/2014 OsC mtg Alan Grant. 2 OsC mtg 24/4/ MICE Finances - Forward Look.
1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM33 Glasgow University 25 th – 29 th June 2012 STFC Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors : Ian Mullacrane.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 1. MOM is now Victoria 2. Linda Coney is new MICE Online Group coordinator (rep Jean-Sebastien) May we held.
Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Update 1Alan Bross AEM October 14, 2013.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
MICE CM20 Alain Blondel 10 February The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM20 Spokesmouse remarks.
WBS ? Proposed by IPRP … –Preparation for a review –MICE Costs & Time Scales need to be more accurate & Justified –Technical Leaders arranged by technology.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
MOM Report Linda Coney MICE Operations Manager University of California, Riverside MICE Video Conference May 20, 2010.
MICE CM 32 Wrap UP. Step IV “Almost There” We Must “Keep Our Eyes on the Prize” Alan BrossMICE CM 32 February 8-11,
1 Configuration Database David Forrest University of Glasgow RAL :: 31 May 2009.
1 paul drumm; Date; Title …project report …more comments paul drumm february 2005.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 MICE NEWS MICE VC Next Collaboration meeting will be at Cosener’s14-16 February meeting at Coseners House.
(one of the) Request from MPB
MICE S TEP IV P HYSICS ‘D ELIVERABLES ’ V. Blackmore MAP 2014 Spring Meeting 30 th May, /15 AKA “What will we learn from Step IV?”
What do we want to achieve in this running period? Michael S. Zisman Deputy Spokesmouse Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICO.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
MICE Step IV Commissioning: Overview (March-April 2015) Milorad Popovic MAP 2015 Spring Collaboration Meeting.
Project Managers Report CM38 – Napa Roy Preece 24th February 2014.
L. Coney UC Riverside MICE CM32 – Glasgow – June 2012
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
MICE CM31 Schedule summary
MICE: First Beam Emittance Results w/Particle Detectors
The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment: Controls and Monitoring
How to turn on MICE Step IV
Presentation transcript:

Controls & Monitoring in MICE Pierrick Hanlet 28 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Controls & Monitoring Purpose: Controls refers to: user interface to equipment proper sequencing of equipment Monitoring serves to: protect equipment (early notification) protect data quality Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Controls & Monitoring MICE is a precision experiment Guiding principle: control, or at least measure, systematic uncertainties Monitoring must be performed on all parameters affecting data quality: Example – ToF system has 50ps resolution DT -> cable expansion -> cable inductance -> time error Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Present Organization Task divided into multiple systems: Beamline: Target, magnets, PA, DS, BS, Diffuser Particle ID LM,TOF, CKOV, BPM, KL, EMR Environment monitoring T, Humidity, radiation, water, He, ... DAQ DAQ—CDB—C&M interface, crates,network, ... Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Present Organization Task divided into multiple systems: Tracking tracker and spectrometer solenoids AFC absorber and focusing coils RFCC RF cavities and coupling coils Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

This is all part of Step I Future Organization Task divided into multiple systems: Beamline: Target, magnets, PA, DS, BS, Diffuser Particle ID LM,TOF, CKOV, BPM, KL, EMR Environment monitoring T, Humidity, radiation, water, He, ... DAQ DAQ—CDB—C&M interface, crates,network, ... This is all part of Step I Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Future Organization Task divided into multiple systems: Tracking tracker and spectrometer solenoids AFC absorber and focusing coils RFCC RF cavities and coupling coils Steps II & III Steps II & III Step IV Step V Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Future Organization But we're not done with the planning: a major consideration is not yet in place! Over arching control of C&M and DAQ with state machines defining MICE Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 MICE State Machines Several Considerations: Subsystem C&M developed by different collaborators Must be integrated to ensure safe use of resources and operations MICE operates in different states over differing time periods: Shutdown/Installation Sleep (occasionally over weekends) Testing Data taking Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 MICE State Machines Different states requires different equipment (and data) monitoring requirements: ignore many systems during shutdown state fewer systems ignored during sleep state nothing(?) ignored during data taking different parameters during testing or data taking? different alarms and different alarm limits different parameters and/or frequency to archive Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 MICE State Machines MICE Configuration Database is the “memory” of the experiment. All parameters stored in CDB All parameters referenced from CDB (reduce human error) Different configurations, “states”: Must be defined Must be “tagged” in the CDB Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 MICE Run Sequence Step IV Example (10,240) run: Start run will require: Set magnet currents Set DS currents Set PA Set diffuser Set cooling channel magnets Absorber settings Verify tracker ready Verify BS, DAQ, network ready Check hall environment Start DAQ All from CDB Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Status Step I C&M components operational Step IV plan underway Cooling channel magnets will have uniform C&M Over-arching plan taking shape CDB designed and built Interface functionality being developed Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011

Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011 Summary New systems come online and are (mostly) accounted for Integration for new systems requires proper planning Pierrick M. Hanlet – 17 February 2011