OMEGA DATA CUBE ORBNNNN_M.QUB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GONG Magnetogram pipeline. 2 The GONG Data Processing Pipeline
Advertisements

CHRIS (Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer) sira group sira electro-optics Dr Mike Cutter EO & Technology Business Manager.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS/VIRS Data Record Structure.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Remote sensing in meteorology
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
In-orbit calibration (TOTAL channel) V space -V IBB Raw Earth V (counts) Raw IBB V (counts) =
1 Image Pre-Processing. 2 Digital Image Processing The process of extracting information from digital images obtained from satellites Information regarding.
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
1 Status of Ring-diagram Analysis of MOTH Data Kiran Jain Collaborators: F. Hill, C. Toner.
ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION – HYPERSPECTRAL DATA Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
1 German Aerospace Center VICAR Tutorial Thomas Roatsch, DLR 22-May-2008 Video Image Communication and Retrieval.
High Resolution MODIS Ocean Color Fred Patt 1, Bryan Franz 1, Gerhard Meister 2, P. Jeremy Werdell 3 NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Science Applications.
OMEGA DATA CUBE ORBNNNN_M.QUB Idat  S jdat sdat1 sdat0.
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION B. Gondet,Saint Louis, 21/05/2008.
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Omega dataset available on PSA until today B. Gondet (Ω/MEX) MEx orbit: T = 6.5 hrs ~ 100 orbits / month ~ 5500 orbits Variety of local times OMEGA has.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
Comparison of OMI NO 2 with Ground-based Direct Sun Measurements at NASA GSFC and JPL Table Mountain during Summer 2007 George H. Mount & Elena Spinei.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
Orbits and Sensors Multispectral Sensors. Satellite Orbits Orbital parameters can be tuned to produce particular, useful orbits Geostationary Sun synchronous.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
28° ROSETTA SWT, Data Archiving Working Group, May 19, 2010
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
VIRTIS –H Status Paris 10-11th May 2010 Jean-Michel REESS.
Lunar Radiance Calibration ABI/AHI Solar Reflective Bands
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
Mars Express Data at the Planetary Data System Geosciences Node
VIRTIS flyby of Steins M-IR Spectral analysis
Geometric information for VIRTIS-M data
Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Concept study GOME-2/AVHRR radiance inter-comparison
Pluto’s thermal lightcurve: SPITZER/MIPS observations
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Lunar Observation with
GOES-East DCC analysis
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION
Presentation Summary How Beacons are Located Using Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites Requires Highly accurate Orbit information and Very Stable Beacon Oscillator.
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG
Data Preparation for ASTER
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
What Is Spectral Imaging? An Introduction
XRT Performance Update
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
What’s New in HIPE 10.0 (SPIRE FTS)
Implementation of DCC at JMA and comparison with RTM
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
National Satellite Meteorological Centre
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Presentation Overview
Lunar Observation Activities with a Small Satellite and a Planetary Exploration Satellite. Hodoyoshi-1 Hayabusa-2 Toru Kouyama, AIST
Preliminary SCIAMACHY Lunar observations as intercalibration source
PDS4 Geometry Model Project
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
Remote sensing in meteorology
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

OMEGA DATA CUBE ORBNNNN_M.QUB sdat0 sdat1 Idat S jdat

OMEGA GEOMETRY CUBE (ORBNNNN_M.NAV) Bands 0-20: SWIR-C (All angles in units of 0.0001°) 2: incidence wrt reference ellipsoid 3: emergence wrt reference ellipsoid 4: incidence wrt center of Mars 5: emergence wrt center of Mars 6: longitude of the pixel center 7: latitude of the pixel center 8: incidence wrt the local normal (MOLA) 9: emergence wrt the local normal 10: phase wrt the local normal 11: slant distance (meters) 12: MOLA elevation (meters) 13-16: longitude of the 4 corners 17-20: latitude of the 4 corners Bands 21-35: same as 16-20 for SWIR-L Bands 36-50: same as 16-20 for VIS geocube First cut at positioning. Can be off by

THE OMEGA REDUCTION SOFTWARE (IDL) provided as a ZIP file in the SOFTWARE directory (present revision: SOFT04.ZIP) unzipping the latest ZIP file creates a subdirectory SOFTNN all files from the SOFTNN subdirectory must be copied to the working directory A users’ guide and information on updates is provided in SOFTNN_readme.txt omega_path must be edited so as to point to the proper directories for the QUB and NAV files respectively (which can be the same) the path must end with a \ for windows, with a / for linux a QUB file and its NAV file can then be read by typing: IDL (CR) IDL> .run readomega (CR) OMEGA observation: ORBNNNN_M (CR) (name without the extension) readomega compiles required procedures, then creates the following arrays idat: raw data sdat0: dark current and offset jdat: radiance sdat1: housekeeping info specmars: solar spectrum ( I/F) wvl: table of wavelengths geocube: geometry information mtf: photometric function exposure: 3 values (C, L, Vis) summation: co-added successive scans detailed information on the content of these arrays is provided in the EAICD (/doc repertory in PSA)

OMEGA DATA SET AND ARCHIVE Access through the Planetary Science Archive at ESTEC with a mirror in the PDS data base increasing numbers of bad pixels with time (see next talk) The data and tools available to the « wide science community » are those available to CoI’s during the proprietary period Basic policy : - no « final truth » calibrated data set (level 2) - level 1B is the prime data set, with associated geometry cubes (for each pixel: longitude, latitude, incidence, emergence, phase, distance, MOLA altitude) - reduction software to level 2 is provided (IDL)

Main derived variables of interest (see EAICD for details) Radiance factor: jdat(*,k,*)/specmars(k) for k=0,351 Cos(incidence): cos(geocube(*,2,*)*1.e-4*!dtor) Reflectance factor: Radiance factor / cos(incidence) Distance along LOS: geocube(*,10,*)*1.e-4 MOLA altitude: geocube(*,11,*)*1.e-4 MOLA local incidence: cos(geocube(*,8,*)*1.e-4*!dtor) Center longitude: geocube(*,6,*) * 1.e-4 (C channel) Center latitude: geocube(*,7,*) * 1.e-4 (C channel) Geometry restitution by Nicolas Manaud when he was at IAS Relative positionning is very good for 16, 32 and 64 pixel modes. A small correction is needed for 128 pixel modes, it will be Included in a future release Absolute positioning can be off by several km (1 sec along track: 4 km at pericenter) Repositioning the cube is required

REPOSITIONNING A CUBE agreed upon referential for Mex: IAU 2000 (East longitudes) available information: MOLA derived variables (geocube): altitude, local incidence Viking HR mosaic (MAPPS) MGS image data set in progress: MRO data already available in the data set: MOLA altitude and local incidence local_light_level=cos(geocube(*,8,*)*!dtor*1.e-4) a map of this variable is expected to match the albedo map at wavelengths < 3.5 µm (no thermal contribution) if the region is spectrally grey

Example from orbit 1254_3 I/F (1.3 µm) cos(local inc.) applying correlation methods makes it possible to reposition the I/F map relative to MOLA within a fraction of a pixel the same process is required for each channel I/F (1.3 µm) cos(local inc.) I/F (1.3 µm) shift by 2 pixels left and 1 pixel down

EVOLUTION OF THE L CHANNEL (128 to 255, 2.53 µm to 5.1 µm) Internal cal level is very stable for the C channel variations by more than a factor of 2 for the L channel over 1 year of operations lesser impact for the signal from Mars the photometric function for the L channel applies only to high level regions (close to ground calibration levels): orbits 0018 to 0500 orbits 0905 to 1206 Level of internal cal, spectel 102 (green, C) and 165 (red, L) the C to L angular distance (nominally ~ 1 pixel = 1.2 mrad) increases up to 3 mrad (nearly 3 pixels) for low levels of the internal calibration C to L co-registration is required so as to obtain a reliable full spectrum common reference: MOLA DTM (provided in geocube) C to L angular distance / level of the internal cal

Co-registering the three channels: cube 1254_3 VIS channel I/F at 0.69 µm C channel I/F at 1.30 µm L channel I/F at 3.52 µm shift by 5 pixels right shift by 4 pixels down shift by 2 pixels down the elongated PSF of the VIS channel impacts the spatial resolution

co-registration of channels, cube 18_01 0.69 µm 1.30 µm 3.51 µm solar longitude : Ls 333° (late southern summer) aerosols: Optical thickness ~ 1 In the visible decreases with wavelength: Improving contrast black: 0.5 max, white: max

SCANNING PROBLEMS AT 128 PIXELS WHEN THE SCANNER IS TOO COLD (< -15 C) anomalous scan Normal scan scan 171 has a problem Scan position, pixel 2, 128 pixel mode, cube 1354_3

SCANNER WARM-UP CUBES a solution to this problem consists in operating the scanner in a “safe” mode (64 pixels) so as to heat it up warm-up 64 pixels cubes are always labeled “NNNN_0” (only when before a 128 pixel cube, some are fully OK) they are stored with high compression (1 bit/data) they can include the last stages of detector cooling litmus test for using “NNNN_0” cubes: check detector temperatures “C” detector: sdat1(0,2, j) where j is the number of the scan “L” detector: sdat1(1,2, j) where j is the number of the scan Units: 0.001 °C. Valid temperatures: < -190 °C

CONCLUSIONS the positioning information provided by SOFTNN is reliable as a first indication. If it goes wild, this is real (the scanner is oscillating at high frequency) fine tuning is needed for each channel. Accurate positioning at sub-pixel levels can be achieved by comparing with MOLA slopes, altitudes. the offset between the C channel and the L channel depends on the status of the instrument, which can be inferred from the level of the calibration lamp