Change Request Panel report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryomodule Helium Volumes Tom Peterson, Fermilab AWLC14 13 May 2014.
Advertisements

Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Thanks to all the presenters who made this an excellent meeting 1 Meeting Summary CFS-ADI Tokyo 2014 Mike Harrison.
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site Conceptual design of the cryogenic system Layout of the cryogenic plant for site A & B New layout of the cryogenic system.
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
SL Village Hall June 24, 2002 Village of Freeport, New York Freeport Electric Village of Freeport, New York Freeport Electric.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
Conceptual Design Study - Cryogenic Requirements How to decide the layout of ILC cryogenic system Conceptual design of cryogenic system Layout of cryogenic.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
BDS Magnet-Power System-Facility Optimization1 ILC BDS Kickoff Meeting Basis for Magnet, Power System and Cooling Facility Optimization Discussion Paul.
LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Detector Hall Configuration Overview New baseline (Hybrid A’) proposed.
ILC Cryogenics Layout: A draft consensus for the Change Request CFS and Cryogenics Two-days Workshop at CERN 27 and 28, July, 2015.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
19 July 2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort 1 Cryogenic Systems Review Tom Peterson for the cryogenics global group.
1 Global Design Effort TILC08 - WG1 Summary WG-1: Cost Reduction Studies J. Carwardine, T. Shidara, N. Walker (For WG-1 participants)
More than an idea not yet a project 1 Meeting Issues & Goals CFS-ADI Tokyo 2014 Mike Harrison.
Cryogenic update before Fermilab meeting (and after the helium tank review) Coordination meeting 6 th May 2015 K. Brodzinski HiLumi-LHC-CC-Cryo-PPT-18_v1.
TDR Status of Asian CFS Team Part II: The ILC Baseline Reference Ch.SectionSubsectionsAuthor1 st draft 112: Asian Region Siting Studies Overview Location.
Report from ILC CFS and Cryogenics Workshop
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Two-Stage Cryocooler Development for Liquid Hydrogen Systems A project supported by NASA Hydrogen Research at Florida Universities.
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
Experience from large helium inventory management at CERN ILC Cryogenics and Helium inventory meeting CERN, Wed. 18 th of June 2014 D. Delikaris Technology.
Issues about the full scale thermosiphon (TSP ) D. Giugni Thermosiphon Review III, May 28 th 2010 D. GiugniThermosiphon Review III, May
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson ADI Meeting July 2, ADI Meeting Ewan Paterson 7/2/15.
1 Cryogenic Design and the 4 He Evaporative Purifier David G. Haase, et al., North Carolina State University.
1 May 22, Y.Sugimoto Update of detector hall in mountain region.
Retrofitting and Maintenance. Regular Maintenance is Necessary Failure to Perform Maintenance Leads to….. Diminished Performance Deterioration Failure.
ILC Cryogenic System Shallow versus Deep Tunnel Tom Peterson Dubna Meeting 5 June 2008.
S UPER B site status report S. Tomassini INFN-LNF On behalf of SuperB Collaboration SuperB general meeting– Frascati – December 1-5, 2009.
AWLC14 - FERMILAB May 12-16, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, A Enomoto, J Osborne.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
H. Hayano(KEK), B. Petersen(DESY), T. Peterson(FNAL),
ILC Cryogenics: Study of Emergency Action and Recovery - in progress -
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Review of the International Linear Collider (ILC) Electrical and Mechanical System Design to be held at CERN on 21 March, 2012 The purpose of the Review.
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
SUPERB site status report for layout v12
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
ILC Accelerator Update
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
Marco Oriunno (SLAC), March 12, 2014 MDI WG
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
N. Hasan1, P. Knudsen2 and V. Ganni2
BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans
Detector Service Cavern for ILC
Status of Cryogenics Facilities Design
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
The DBD: Outline and Scope
ILC GDE meeting Cryogenics
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Overview of Day One – 29 Feb 2016
Central Region Working Group
CTF Users’ Perspective
ILC - Global Design Effort
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
Presentation transcript:

Change Request Panel report CR009 & CR014: Cryogenic Update Mike Harrison, Vic Kuchler, Nick Walker (with help from Hitoshi H, Tom P, Berndt P for CR009)

Design Changes - cryogenics Overview of request The change request modifies the cryogenic plant layout from that proposed in the TDR. The main helium compressors and associated cryogenic storage tanks are moved from the underground cavern to the surface. An additional helium recovery compressor and backup power generator (1MW) is also added to recover the helium boil off from the cryomodules during a power outage or scheduled accelerator warm-up. A helium recovery line replaces a cryogenic transfer line. The proposed changes are shown schematically in figures 1 & 2. It is evident that the surface footprint is significantly larger and the tunnel cavern correspondingly smaller with these CR’s than the baseline design as described in the TDR.

Design Changes - cryogenics

Design Changes - cryogenics Review Panel comments The logistics of operations with the compressors on the surface are certainly improved (power, cooling, vibration, tunnel noise, maintenance, repair) the Panel find the most compelling reason for moving the compressors and liquid inventory is that of underground helium storage. Safety considerations of such a helium volume would impact many aspects of operation and make relatively routine operations such as maintenance essentially impractical.   Protecting the helium inventory during warm-ups, both planned and accidental, would also appear to be a crucial aspect of the system requirements which was not addressed in the TDR baseline. These CR’s rectify that omission.

Design Changes - cryogenics Review Panel comments Since there are no natural supplies of helium in Japan all the helium needs to be imported. The consequences of a major loss of inventory could be very significant in both delayed operation and money. This issue was not addressed in the TDR but it is in these CR’s. The assumption is that any significant power outage would result in at least 6 hrs of refrigerator downtime. The proposed system would be scoped for emergency operation of up to 24 hrs with 50% gas and 50% liquid. With adjustments to the gas storage volume and generator fuel availability the system could easily operate for a longer period if deemed necessary.

Design Changes - cryogenics Review Panel comments: cost & schedule It is difficult to quantify the cost impact of the CR’s since it is a significant change and the corresponding estimates in the TDR were generic rather than detailed. The proposals call for a significantly smaller underground enclosure, a significantly reduced tunnel heat load and a simplification of the cryogenic transport lines. All of these items will result in cost decreases, at a level potentially noticeable in the context of the ILC. On the other side of the ledger, the above ground footprint is larger, helium storage (both gas and liquid) is added, as is a 1MW emergency power generator, a gas compressor, and a small liquefier. Given the relative cost differential of above and below ground construction the expected cost impact is broadly neutral slightly tilted towards a cost reduction.   There should be no significant change to the schedule.

Design Changes - cryogenics Review Panel Conclusions The change review panel recommends the CMB accept these CR’s.   The logistics of operations with the compressors on the surface are certainly improved (power, cooling, vibration, tunnel noise, maintenance, repair) the Panel find the most compelling reason for moving the compressors and liquid inventory is that of underground helium storage. Safety considerations of such a helium volume would impact many aspects of operation and make relatively routine operations such as maintenance essentially impractical. Protecting the helium inventory during warm-ups, both planned and accidental, would also appear to be a crucial aspect of the system requirements which was not addressed in the TDR baseline. These CR’s rectify that omission.

Design Changes - cryogenics Review Panel Conclusions In regard to environmental considerations the Panel notes that DESY cryogenic facilities are successfully operated in built-up areas of high population density and noise and vibration abatement has proven feasible. The same is true to a lesser degree with the RHIC cryogenic plant. With surface construction at the Kitakami site then the visual impact can be mitigated with some form of pit and associated landscaping. The details of this will depend on the exact location of the cryogenic penetrations and vary between the different locations.   The Panel notes in passing that there are actually two separate refrigerator systems at each location corresponding to the upstream and downstream cryo units. Although not present in the current design some form of interconnection could provide a level of redundancy in the case of equipment failure The Panel believes that the CR will be broadly cost neutral but a new estimate will need to be made at some point. We predict there is minimal schedule impact.