GENE EDITING: Regulatory & IP Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commercial Research, Biodiversity and Benefit Sharing: Exploring Best Practices for Biotrade and ABS – Windhoek, Namibia, 18 th to 20 th June 2007 The.
Advertisements

The Role of Customs Officers in Implementing the Protocol GRULAC Regional Training of Trainers Workshop on the Identification and Documentation of LMOs.
The United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
Prof. Gregory N. Mandel Albany Law School © 2005 Gregory N. Mandel Regulating Genetically Modified Food.
Inadequacies in the Federal Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology Gregory Jaffe Director, Biotechnology Project Center for Science in the Public Interest.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Rocky Beem 2011 Smithfield Environmental Conference.
1 Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Sheryl K. Reilly, Ph.D. Chief, Biochemical Pesticides Branch
The United States Experience Implementing the WTO SPS Agreement Hangzhou, China December 2008 Roseanne Freese Senior WTO SPS Affairs Officer United States.
Introduction to Regulatory Affairs: Agencies and Permit Process Advanced Biotechnology (c)(8)(A)
History of FDA and Related Regulatory Agencies
Government Agencies HUM-FNW-3 Unit 4. USDA United States Department of Agriculture Mission Statement We provide leadership on food, agriculture, natural.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
Regulation and Safety Assessment of Novel Foods in Canada William Yan, Ph.D. Office of Food Biotechnology Health Canada.
Industry Actions to Enhance Consumer Confidence in Biotechnology Gregory Jaffe Director, Biotechnology Project Center for Science in the Public Interest.
Regulating Plant- Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) A State and National Perspective Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 12-14, 2004 Spokane, Washington.
Chemicals Management in a Transatlantic Perspective Henrik Selin November 10, 2008.
Safety and Regulation in Agricultural Biotechnology MUPGRET Workshop.
Regulatory Structure for GE Crops Alan McHughen, D.Phil., University of California Riverside, Ca USA
The CFIA: Who We Are and What We Do March 2014 Presented by: Aline Dimitri Presented at: McGill University.
FDA’s Policy for Evaluating Bioengineered Foods Jeanette Glover Glew Food and Drug Administration Center For Food Safety and Applied Nutrition September,
Animal Feed GRAS Notifications Geoffrey K. Wong, M.S. Division of Animal Feeds Center for Veterinary Medicine Pet Food Institute Pet Food Institute October.
Nick Yeager Scientist.  The term Genetically modified organism comes from plants or crops created for human consumption using the latest molecular biology.
Malini M. Wileman, PhD, RAC Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulation of.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
-Drafted in Amendment Years were in 1954 and National law in United States.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine Plant Protection & Quarantines Roles.
EFSA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008 The Management Plan
USDA-APHIS Plant Pest Risk Assessments Science Issues and Research Needs Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grants Program 2015 Project Director’s Meeting.
Biotechnology in Switzerland FOEN Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) Activities Responsibilities and Competences Objectives of GMO Regulation Key.
Tanzania Aflatoxin Workshop December 3 and 4, 2012 Collaboration across Ministries of Health, Agriculture and Livestock to enhance dietary diversity and.
Pesticide Regulatory Process
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1938, 1954, 1958 (FFDCA) Katie Buhai Period 3.
SPS ISSUES IN THE NAFTA REGION
NS 440 LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN FOOD PRODUCTION SPRING YOUNTS DAHL, MS PHD INSTRUCTOR Unit 5: Policy Considerations in Food Regulation.
The World Leader in High Performance Signal Processing Solutions Global Intellectual Property Protection December 2014 Jason Fiorillo Chief I.P. Counsel.
SUNITA K SREEDHARAN SKS LAW ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI 23 July 2014, Delhi.
EPA: Research Needs and Considerations for Microbial Pest Control Agents and Plant- incorporated Protectants NIFA BRAG PI Meeting, June 4, 2014 John L.
How safe is that drink? Ensuring product integrity from manufacture through consumption William H. Foster Assistant Administrator, Headquarters Operations.
FDA Public Meeting on Electronic Records and Signatures June 11, 2004 Presentation of the Industry Coalition on 21CFR Part 11 Alan Goldhammer, PhD Chair.
General overview of South Africa’s commitment to global market access & maintenance based on requirements for phytosanitary measures by PATRICK TSHIKHUDO.
NCCR International Trade NCCR IP9 WORKSHOP 17 th May 2006 Patentability of Life Forms By Michelangelo Temmerman.
PESTICIDE REGULATIONS AND ANTIFOULING PAINTS WISCONSIN MARINE ASSOCIATION MARCH 12, 2015 MIKE MURRAY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION.
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
Overview of Risk Assessment and Risk Management of PIPs in the U.S.
Genetically Modified Foods Beth Roberson November 19, 2004 FST 490.
Maximum Residue Levels –Why Should You Care?
By Isaac and Christy.  GMOs are regulated by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), the APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service), and the EPA.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Systems Recognition Import System Public Meeting March 21, 2016 Caroline Smith DeWaal International Food Safety.
Biotech Regulations Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office June, 2002.
Seed Industry and IPR: A Seed Industry View Dr. Stephen Smith.
Entrepreneurship Business Taxes Presented By Mrs. Bowden.
Emily Marden Sidley Austin LLP University of British Columbia
Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office
Government Regulations
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
What we all need to know about the powers that be!
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Introduction to TransCelerate
Perspectives on Licensing “How to be the Best Partner”
(National) Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) 1938 (Amended 1954 and 1958) Jenny Tumay Period 3.
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
Introduction to TransCelerate
EU GATEWAY TO KOREA Facilitating long-lasting business collaborations
The GATS Waiver – some key issues
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Hemp U.S. EPA SFIREG JUNE 3-4, 2019.
Laws, Agencies and Treaties
Presentation transcript:

GENE EDITING: Regulatory & IP Considerations Cassie J. Edgar Chief IP & Regulatory Officer Genus plc IowaBIO Innovation Workshop November 2017

Overview Why talk about IP & Regulatory? Four Key Takeaways All organisms are not treated the same Regulatory Framework is a global puzzle Know your tennis balls IP strategy needs to be evergreen Why talk about IP & Regulatory? Four Key Takeaways

Why talk about IP & Regulatory for gene editing? Appropriate IP & Regulatory counsel is critical IP & Regulatory decisions deeply embedded from initiation through post-launch phases Intellectual Property Freedom to operate Patents vs. trade secrets Contract considerations for biological materials Patent exhaustion, IP enforcement Regulatory: Local, National, Global Agency relationships and understanding requirements Regulatory Data Package & Approvals Stewardship Compliance Business Development Startups Funding: Seed, Series A, B, IPO Collaborations, JVs, M&A Product Development Project and Portfolio Management Risk assessment and mitigation Launch and post-launch planning

Four Key Takeaways All organisms are not treated the same Regulatory Framework is a global puzzle Know your tennis balls IP strategy needs to be evergreen Four Key Takeaways

All organisms are not treated the same Coordinated Framework for Biotechnology USDA Scope: Plants and seeds, animal biologics, meat & poultry Gene editing: Authority to regulate GE plants that are or have the potential to be “plant pests” as defined and detailed in 7 CFR 340 Plant Protection Act (PPA) 7 U.S.C. §§ 7701 et seq. FDA Food & Feed, human biologics, drugs, GE animals, medical devices Gene editing: human applications, voluntary consultation if novel protein in plants, GE animals regulated as animal drugs Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) 21 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq. EPA Plant pesticides, herbicides, chemicals, microbials, GE mosquitos Gene editing: GE mosquitos if they are “pesticides” FIFRA : 7 21 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq. National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et. seq.

Overview: GE Food Regulatory Requirements Examples With GE organisms intended for human consumption, there are a variety of approvals required: Data requirements differ per country: there is no global harmonized regulatory system Data requirements differ for cultivation and food/feed approvals Labeling Changes in labeling requirements and public desire for transparency will likely also result in labeling distinction of final food products Cultivation/Production Approval to grow Food/Feed Approval for consumption Permits/ Shipment Examples: For interstate and international movement

Regulatory framework for gene editing is global puzzle Engagement with emerging global regulatory framework is necessary for commodity products Countries are still figuring out when and how to regulate gene edited products Engagement in dialogue is critical Recent jurisdictions of focus: Canada, Mexico, China, Korea, Japan, EU With public, government, industry groups, and regulators

Methods of playing the game Know your tennis balls IP analysis and strategy begins with answering this question: “What are you trying to accomplish” News on interference proceedings or patent claims or “who owns the patents” must be analyzed in the proper context of that question Consider offense and defense Tennis Balls Green tennis balls Keeping score Ball holders Methods of playing the game Footballs

IP Strategy needs to be evergreen Appropriate IP & Regulatory counsel is critical IP & Regulatory decisions need to be refreshed throughout product lifecycle On any given Tuesday, the world can change… Intellectual Property Freedom to operate Patents vs. trade secrets Contract considerations for biological materials Patent exhaustion, IP enforcement Regulatory: Local, National, Global Agency relationships and understanding requirements Regulatory Data Package & Approvals Stewardship Compliance Business Development Startups Funding: Seed, Series A, B, IPO Collaborations, JVs, M&A Product Development Project and Portfolio Management Risk assessment and mitigation Launch and post-launch planning Regulatory & IP law changes on a more rapid cadence than product development timelines for gene edited products…

Thank you! IP & Regulatory legal partnership with the business is critical to advancing innovation Four Key Takeaways for regulatory & IP in gene editing All organisms are not treated the same Regulatory Framework is a global puzzle Know your tennis balls IP strategy needs to be evergreen Questions? Cassie Edgar 515.537.4212 twitter:@biotech_counsel