Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUARTIC- A Precise ToF Detector for the FP420 Project James Pinfold For the QUARTIC Working Group René Magritte: Empire of Light.
Advertisements

T958! Fermilab Test beam experiment to study fast timing counters for FP420 MOU between UTA, Alberta, Louvain, Fermilab (Brandt spokesman) Data taking.
QUARTZTOFMike Albrow CMS-FP420 April 28 th 2008 QUARTZTOF An isochronous & achromatic Cerenkov Counter Making Cerenkov light parallel  point focusing.
Radiator study status Y. Horii, Y. Koga, N. Kiribe, … (Nagoya University, Japan) 1 B2GM, 6 th July.
1 QUARTIC, A TOF for ATLAS/CMS Forward Protons You didn’t know that ATLAS+CMS had forward protons? FP420 = Forward Protons 420m downstream of CMS & ATLAS.
The UC Simulation of Picosecond Detectors Pico-Sec Timing Hardware Workshop November 18, 2005 Timothy Credo.
Fermilab / U. Chicago / Argonne Collaborative Initiative on Ultra Fast Timing Detectors With: (ANL) Karen Byrum, Gary Drake, Bob Wagner (UC) Henry Frisch,
1 QUARTIC: UTA Update Andrew Brandt, Chance Harenza, Joaquin Noyola, Pedro Duarte Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time resolution.
Groups Involved University of Alberta, University of Texas at Arlington, University College London. Prague, Saclay, Stoneybrook, Giessen, Manchester,
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Fast Timing Workshop Krakow, Nov 29 - Dec 1 st 2010 Part 2b.
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
1 Fast Timing via Cerenkov Radiation‏ Earle Wilson, Advisor: Hans Wenzel Fermilab CMS/ATLAS Fast Timing Simulation Meeting July 17,
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
1 QUARTIC Update Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL), Jim Pinfold (Alberta) Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time.
1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.
FP420/AFP Timing Two types of Cerenkov detector are employed: QUARTIC – two QUARTIC detectors each with 4 rows of 8 fused silica bar allowing up to a 4-fold.
The primary goal has been to have the AFP timing system fully defined for the AFP Technical Proposal by December The end result should be a system.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Andrew BrandtSept 13 th 2005FP420/Cerenkov Intro 1 Location of LHC in France and Switzerland, with lake Geneva and the Alps in the background The ATLAS.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
Mike AlbrowSept 14 th 2006Time-of-Flight with GASTOFs im Test Beam 1 Fast Timing Counters for FP420/CMS and Test Beam Particle ID Mike Albrow, September.
Fast Timing Mtg April 15 th 2009 Mike Albrow Fast Timing studies at Fermilab : Test beam plans notes from meeting April 15 th 2009 MTest May Wed 27 th.
July 4, 2008 SuperBelle Meeting, KEKPeter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Burle MCP PMTs as photon detector.
APS April Meeting Detector Construction of the Forward Proton Detector at D0 Michael Strang University of Texas at Arlington Diffractive Events FPD.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
Anatoly Ronzhin, 23 June, 2009 Anatoly Ronzhin, June 23, 2009 The main results of the TOF study at MT beams, May-June 2009 The team: Anatoly Ronzhin, Hans.
Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya) Ljubljana, Hawaii, Cincinnati and PID group - R&D status - Structure design - Prototype study - Beam test - Photon.
1 10 Psec Workshop April 28 at UTA Follow up on visit to SLAC to meet Jerry Va’vra and very successful Pico-Second Timing Hardware Workshop at University.
Beam Halo Monitor : Q-bars+SiPMMike Albrow, 26 Aug 2010 A Beam Halo Monitor for the LHC based on Quartz Cherenkov Counters Mike Albrow (Fermilab) Features:
03/22/2007HCal Electronics Meeting HO LIGHT GUIDE SIMULATIONS Justin Parsons, University of Iowa Jim Freeman, FNAL HO LIGHT GUIDE SIMULATIONS 1.
Quartz Plates R&D Status By F. Duru, S. Ayan, U. Akgun, J. Olson, Y. Onel The University Of Iowa V.Podrasky, C. Sanzeni, D.R.Winn Fairfield University.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Amir Farbin, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate.
1 Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike’s concept for a fast time resolution Cerenkov counter: proton Microchannel plate PMT Initial design uses 2 mm 2 rods,
FP420 Backgrounds Marta Ruspa, Univ. Piemonte Orientale & INFN-Torino, Italy Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington) Much of what is known about pileup background.
Module-0 of AFP ToF Detector Libor Nozka on behalf of ATLAS Forward Proton Group Palacky University 1.
FP420/AFP Fast Timing Stage I: LHC luminosity 2 x10 33  t < 20 ps (
Pileup Background Rejection Ex, Two protons from one interaction and two b-jets from another Fast Timing Detectors for FP420 z=c(TR-TL)/2  z (mm) =0.21.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
AFP Fast Timing System Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington in collaboration with Alberta, Giessen, Stony Brook, and FNAL, Louvain, LLNL (CMS)
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
CDMS II Shielding To Installation To Construction From Design.
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
10 picoseconds original design goal (light travels 3mm in 10 psec!) gives large factor of background rejection; Phase I: lum up to several  t
Mike Albrow, FermilabHPS Comments, Manchester 20l0 Some random HPS comments Mike Albrow HPS is accepted in CMS as an R&D project : Physics case is accepted.
Time resolution for the full detector system: 1. Intrinsec detector time resolution 2. Jitter in PMT's 3. Electronics (AMP/CFD/TDC) 4. Reference Timing.
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington
Overview of SuperB Particle identification, and work towards the TDR
RPC with strip readout Last results from test of timing glass
HPS: R&D issues Krzysztof Piotrzkowski (UCLouvain/CERN)
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
“Performance test of a lead glass
Test Beam Studies for FP420 Fast Timing
QUARTZTOF An isochronous & achromatic Cerenkov Counter
Report from Fermilab: Beam Tests and QUARTZTOFs
Jim Pinfold & Yushu Yao Mar. 27, 2007
Simulation for Fast Focusing DIRC R&D
QUARTIC TDC Development at Univ. of Alberta
The Development of Large-Area Psec-Resolution TOF Systems
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Progress on the development of a low-cost fast-timing microchannel plate photodetector Junqi Xie1, Karen Byrum1, Marcel Demarteau1, Joseph Gregar1, Edward.
The New Readout Electronics for the SLAC Focusing DIRC Prototype (SLAC experiment T-492 ) L. L. Ruckman, G. S. Varner Instrumentation Development Laboratory.
Latest Results from T979: PSec Time-of-flight
The Development of Large-Area Psec-Resolution TOF Systems
Variable distance from beam.
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL), QUARTIC Update Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL), Jim Pinfold (Alberta) Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time resolution Cerenkov counter: Baseline design has 6mm2 rods proton z (mm) =0.21 t (psec) (2.1 mm for t=10 psec) z=c(TR-TL)/2 Microchannel plate PMT

UTA Funding News Submitted DOE ADR 12/15/05 $100k/2 years; June notification, elec+students Submitted internal pre-proposal for Texas ARP; 11/30/05 approved for ARP submission (12/79!) 2/14/05 full proposal; 4/20/05 decision; FUNDED! 5/15/05 funds $100k/2 years mechanics+pulser+students

10 Psec Workshop April 28/29 at UTA http://www-hep.uta.edu/~brandta/uta-pico/uta-pico.html Follow up on visit to SLAC to meet Jerry Va’vra and very successful Pico-Second Timing Hardware Workshop at University of Chicago Nov. 18 2005 (UC focussed on large TOF, but led to valuable contacts) This UTA workshop was dedicated to issues in fast TOF detectors O(10 psec), with a focus on near beam detectors at the LHC. Special attention was given to Burle/Photonis MCP-PMT performance and readout electronics.  Of specific interest to FP420 is electronics and other issues involved in achieving 10-15 psec resolution, status of tube development, and fostering collaboration

Agenda April 28 April 29 1. Jim Horwitz (UTA) (10') Welcome 2. Andrew Brandt (UTA) (30') Workshop goals. QUARTIC.  3. Luc Bonnet (Louvain) (30') GASTOF  4. Henry Frisch (Univ. Chicago) (20') Large Area ps TOF systems  5. Jerry Va'vra (SLAC) (40') MCP-PMT studies  6. Paul Hink (Burle) (30') Burle Update  7. All (20') Discussion  8. Mike Albrow (Fermilab) (10') Timing references  9. Jim Pinfold (Univ. Alberta) (20') QUARTIC timing circuit  10. All (30') Discussion of fast timing circuits, amplis, Burle tubes, Collaboration UTA/UC/SLAC/UA etc.   11. All (xh00') More discussion, open ended April 29 QUARTIC planning/TB

New Drawings Sawtooth easier to courtesy of: fabricate Jaak Lippma 8 rods in z courtesy of: Jaak Lippma Helsinki

QUARTIC Background Rejection (UTA) 2 single diffractive protons overlayed with a hard scatter (1% of interactions have a proton at 420m) 97.4% of events primary vertex and fake vertex from combining proton times more than 2.1mm (1) apart ; 94.8% if 20 psec 2) double pomeron overlayed with a hard scatter 97.8% of time vertices more than 2.1mm apart; 95.6% if 20 psec 3) hard SD overlayed with a soft SD 95.5% of time primary vertex and fake vertex more than 2.1mm apart; 91.0% if 20 psec

QUARTIC Design Baseline detector: 4x8 6mm square rods of fused silica In z consider 4@12 mm instead of 8@6 mm In x consider 16 x 1.5 mm (needs 1032 tube) Consider limiting wavelength range Larger n to get more light Gallium arsenide to improve QE for visible Surfaces aluminized or spaced Continuing studies while awaiting definitive answer from simulations (GEANT) and/or test beam: Time resolution for the full detector system: 1. Intrinsec detector time resolution 2. Jitter in PMT's 3. Electronics (TDC)

Preliminary Time Distributions (UTA): Single  (500 nm) red = totally internally reflected light green = extra light if aluminized All  (185-600 nm) 50 psec Not enough light in leading edge; peak to wide!

Time Distributions by Wavelength (UTA): n() vs. 

Filter Solution? $? Chroma Technology Corp http://www.chroma.com

Some Variations Larger n (1.8) does not give more timely light, larger angle so less effective width, a little more light but later 12 mm bars give twice the fast light (about 7 photons for >300nm case)

Mini-Bars Larger n (1.8) does not give more light, larger angle so less effective width, a little more light but later 12 mm bars give a little more than twice the fast light (about 7 photons for >300nm case) 3 cm long bar gives >2x the fast light, use different light guide? 3 cm long bar reduces dispersion no filter needed 3-> 14 photons! different light guide?

Fused Silica Purchase Specialty Glass Products, Inc: 5.    Fused Silica Rod; 6mm+-.051mm square; 9cm+-.0254cm long; 6mm x 9cm sides mechanically polished finish, within 1° parallelism and perpendicularity and less than or equal to 1 wave/inch flat; one end mechanically polished finish. Quantity     8 pieces Price          $39.00 each 6.     Fused Silica Rod; 6mm+-.051mm square; 9cm+-.0254cm long; 6mm x 9cm sides mechanically polished finish, within 1° parallelism and perpendicularity and less than or equal to 1 wave/inch flat; both ends mechanically polished finish. Quantity     24 pieces Price : $36.00 each (Had 4 of the bars converted to 16 mini-bars) Technical Glass Products, Inc: I) Fused silica n~1.5    lengths for a set are 90,95,100,105,110,115 mm     a) high transmission over range 180-700 nm        i) 4 sets polished on all faces $2,565.00 per set (GASP)   

Fused Silica Bars 9 cm bars arrived mini-bars en route

Test Beam News May 5 TB meeting leads to decoupling of FP420 and CMS Pixels, locate a better area downstream of CMS, with more space >1m, will allow simultaneous test of Quartic+Gastof, easier integration into CAMAC-based DAQ Pedro goes to Fermi for summer May 15, to prepare for TB Tentative date July 24-31 Mike setting up MOU

TB Preparation 1) buy "quartz" (UTA) 2) simple frame (UTA) 3) air light guides (Alberta) 4) readout integration, data analysis preparation (UTA) 5) electronics circuit (Alberta/Louvain) i) off shelf nim/camac cfd and tdc for early test beam July 24 ii) new improved circuit for Aug./Sep. 6) Test beam preparation (FNAL, UTA, Alberta) manpower: pedro+? Louvain (3) Helsinki?, Saclay? other? 7) Analysis all

Test Beam Frame side view side view cross section wires to hold bars allows reconfig

Test Beam Electronics 64 Channel MCP-PMT Amplifier 2 ch fast; rest phillips pc-board? LeCroy 2249A ADC 2x12 3 1 4 2 5 Const. Frac. Disc. (Phillips 715) TDC (Phillips 7186) 1) -3k HV, 4 channels needed 2) get a couple expensive single channel amps (ORTEC 9306) in addition to work on PC board 3) Plan to get a couple expensive single channel amps (Ortec 9306) in addition to Louvain work on PC board 4) Phillips 715 CFD is suitable, are there 4 available at Fermi (5 channel each)?, will be on board for final setup (Alberta) 5) In process of purchasing Phillips 7186 16 channel TDC ($3k) , 25 psec least bit, use HPTDC for final setup.

Pinfold on Air Light Guides The problem we are facing with the air light guide and Winston Cones is exactly the same problem that we have faced with LUCID, where we have a Cerenkov tube array (essentially an array of air light guides) plus a WC collection system. We are tooled up to optimize the air-light guide WC design. The problem is a 3-D one if you want to optimize the design. We have the GEANT4 software to do this. We plan to make the air light guide matrix using a 3-D plotter. We will line the resulting matrix with aluminized Mylar to make the air light guides. We can program the WC design to fit on the end of the air light guides and "print" the new detector. Although we can line the plastic square light guides with aluminized mylar it would be hard to do this with a WC since it has a 3-D "parabolic-like" surface. Our plan would be to vacuum deposit aluminium on the inner surface of the WC. We already have some experience with this as part of the LUCID project.

Albrow Sketch of Mini-bar Solution 6 20 p 6 dimensions in mm, not to scale (mini-bar at 50 deg to p) ~ 60 Fused Silica ~ 10 Air light guide (Aluminium box, or mylar lined plastic) 4 4 Taper 6  4 (4 is a guess) (Crude “Winston Cone”) Match to photocathode “sweet spot” Simulations in progress

Conclusions Fast TOF is a critical part of FP420 So how do we achieve a resolution of 10-20ps for the full detector system? 1. 20 ps actual detector seems feasible. 2. 30 ps in the MCP-PMT for a single photon seems feasible. 3. 15 ps electronics seems feasible. Therefore need multiple photon statistics (for each fused silica bar) as well as multiple measurements along the track. (have several bars). Mini-bar solution looks promising Plan to test baseline detector in Fermi test beam this summer Schedule tight Test beam manpower is an issue Funding is less of an issue then it used to be!