Applying Conditional Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen Season Flow Applied to classified and unclassified streams found in Appendix A and D of the Water Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.
Advertisements

Still River Study Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005.
Lowermost Pajaro left-bank bench vegetation just downstream from Thurwatcher Bridge.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Acadia Learning Culverts and Stream Ecology Sampling locations 2012.
HOOD RIVER TRIBUTARIES DRAFT AREA WEIGHTED SUITABILITY Presented by: Thomas Gast, Normandeau Associates Presented to: Hood River Water Planning Group Instream.
Vallecito Creek Drainage Area 1. Vallecito Creek Drainage Drainage Area - 96 sq. miles (61,440 acres) Length of Tributary Streams miles Residential.
Aspinall Unit Seasonal Operation Goals Fill Blue Mesa Reservoir before end of runoff. Operate to the 2012 Aspinall ROD at the Whitewater Gage. Meet the.
Environmental Impact of Impoundment of the Snake Creek Reservoir Keith Rice, Bryan Victor, Dr. Julie K. Bartley, and Dr. Rebecca Dodge; Department of Geosciences,
Golden Alga (Prymnesium parvum ) Salt River Lakes Marc Dahlberg Water Quality Program Manager March 8, 2011.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Stephen Swan CE 394K 2 April 22,  Project Background  Dallas and the Trinity River  Flood of 1908  Current Flood Control Measures  Initial.
Idaho's Climate and Water Resource Forecast for the 2008 Water Year Sponsored by: The Climatic Impacts Group at the University of Washington and the.
Murphy 2012 Bruneau River and Murphy Flows Liz Cresto September 19, 2012.
Rivers and Streams Chapter 18. Hydrologic Cycle Streams A stream is a body of water that is confined in a channel and moves downhill under the influence.
Beneficial Use Monitoring Program Streams A Collection of Stream and Work Photographs 2004 to 2009.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Operating Criteria Review Billings, MT September, 2010 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
2015 Environmental Trade Fair and Conference Jill Csekitz Technical Specialist TCEQ Monitoring & Assessment Section Devils River State Natural Area Image.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Uncertainty in Base Flood Elevation Kate Marney CE 394 Statistics in Water Resources.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
Aquatic Life Selenium Standards Cottonwood Creek Drainage Cherry Creek Segment 4b Regulation 38 June 9, 2015.
2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
West Fork Whitewater River E. coli Water Quality Duration Curve (all sites) IDEM Water Quality Data & USGS Gage Stream Flow Data Upstream Drainage.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Seacoast Utility Authority Water Use Permit Steven Memberg, Section Leader Water Use Regulation Division, Water Supply Department January 26, 2009.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
2013 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2012 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.
Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team.
Potential Changes to Sections and 307.9: Standards Applicability and Attainment Gregg Easley TCEQ Water Quality Standards Team September 6, 2007.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Animas River Stakeholders Group January 26, 2016.
30 TAC Chapter 307 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Workgroup meeting March 7, 2007.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Reservoir Operating Criteria Proposed Modifications Lovell, Wyoming July 29, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Site # 11.5: Middle Fork Feather River above confluence with Grizzly Creek Sierra Valley Dissolved Oxygen Study Summer 2008 Update Upper Feather River.
Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.
Teton Basin Study Teton Lake vs Teton Dam.
225 square miles 20 inches/yr rainfall From the Main Street Bridge, Ventura River: Feb. 2, 2005 (above), Oct. 2, 2004 (below) looking downstream.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Overview of Spokane- Coeur d’Alene Hydrology
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Cache River Monitoring
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Critical Conditions Review
River Basin Management
Albeni Falls Dam Operations
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
Brooke McGregor, Program Liaison, Watermaster Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update
Presentation transcript:

Applying Conditional Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen Season Flow Applied to classified and unclassified streams found in Appendix A and D of the Water Quality Standards Criteria shifts are generally applied in summer months during critical low flows

Site-specific Uses and Criteria Existing DO criteria for 4 segments Table that describes existing dissolved oxygen criteria in Appendix A of the TSWQS Segment 805 – Upper Trinity River, DO Average – 5.0; 3.5 when headwater flow at USGS Gaging Station (located on the West Fork Trinity River in Fort Worth) is less than 80 ft.3/s. The DO minimum is 3.0. Segment 841 – Lower West Fork Trinity River, DO Average – 5.0; 2.5 when headwater flow at USGS Gaging Station (located on the West Fork Trinity River in Fort Worth) is less than 80 ft.3/s. The DO minimum is 3.0. Segment 1428 – Colorado River Below Lady Bird Lake, DO Average – 6.0; 5.0 when stream flows at USGS gage number are less than 150 cfs and greater than or equal to the 7Q2 for the segment. The DO minimum is 4.0. Segment 2307 – Rio Grande Below Riverside Diversion Dam – 5.0; 3.0 when headwater flow over the Riverside Diversion Dam is less than 35 ft3/s. The DO minimum is 3.0.

Site-specific Uses and Criteria Revised DO criteria for 4 segments Table that describes changes to dissolved oxygen criteria in Appendix A of the TSWQS Segment 831 – Clear Fork Trinity River Below Lake Weatherford, DO Average – 5.0; 3.0 from the confluence with an unnamed tributary approximately 1.0 mile downstream of Weatherford Dam upstream to Weatherford Dam, DO Minimum – 3.0; 2.0 from the confluence with an unnamed tributary approximately 1.0 mile downstream of Weatherford Dam upstream to Weatherford Dam Segment 833 – Clear Fork Trinity River Above Lake Weatherford, DO Average – 4.0; 2.0 when flow is less than 1 cfs, DO Minimum – 2.0; 1.0 when less than 1 cfs Segment 1245 – Upper Oyster Creek, DO Average – 4.0, DO Minimum – 3.0; 1.0 from the confluence with Steep Bank Creek/Brazos River upstream to Dam #3 Segment 1305 – Caney Creek Above Tidal – 5.0; 4.0 from the confluence with Hardeman Slough upstream to the confluence with Water Hole Creek; 2.5 from March 15-October when flows are less than 5.0 cfs, DO Minimum – 3.0; 2.0 from March 15-October when flows are less than 5.0 cfs.

Site-specific Uses and Criteria Existing DO criteria for 4 Appendix D waterbodies Table that describes existing dissolved oxygen criteria in Appendix D of the TSWQS Segment 505 – Rabbit Creek, DO Average – 4.0; 3.0 when flows are greater than or equal 1.2 cfs and less than 5.95 cfs and it is May - October. The DO minimum is 3.0. Segment 505 – Eightmile Creek, DO Average – 4.0; 3.0 for the months of June through October. The DO minimum is 3.0. Segment 606 – Black Fork Creek, DO Average – 5.0, 4.0 for the months of May through October. The DO minimum is 4.0. Segment 606 – Prairie Creek– 5.0, 3.0 for the months of May through October. The DO minimum is 3.0.

Site-specific Uses and Criteria Revised DO criteria for 4 appendix D waterbodies Table that describes changes to dissolved oxygen criteria in Appendix D of the TSWQS Segment 1217 – North Fork Rocky Creek, DO Average - 4.0; 2.0 when stream flows are below 1.5 ft3/s., DO Minimum – 3.0; 1.0 when stream flows are below 1.5 ft3/s. Segment 1602 – Lavaca River, DO Average – 5.0; 2.0 from March 15th through October 15 th, DO Minimum – 3.0; 1.0 from March 15th through October 15 th Segment 1806 – Camp Meeting Creek – Guadalupe to unnamed impoundment, DO Average – 5.0; 4.0 for the months of July through September, DO Minimum – 3.0; 2.0 for the months of July through September Segment 1806 – Camp Meeting Creek – unnamed impoundment to Tree Lane in Kerrville, DO Average – 5.0; 2.0 for the months of July through September, DO Minimum – 3.0; 1.0 for the months of July through September

Assessment Changes Criteria are automatically applied with the SAS assessment tool according to the conditions

Flow Dependent Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen If the criterion is flow-dependent and no flow data exists, no criterion will be determined Example: North Fork Rocky Creek DO criterion = 3.0 mg/L but DO criterion: 2.0 mg/L when flow is < 1.5 cfs

SegmentUSEMethodCriteriaNumber of Samples Samples Assessed Number of Exceedances Data Qualifier Binomial Level of Support 1217DAquatic Life Use Dissolved Oxygen 24hr average 55-99LDND 1217DAquatic Life Use Dissolved Oxygen 24hr minimum 55-99LDND 1217DAquatic Life Use Dissolved Oxygen grab minimum LDNC 1217DAquatic Life Use Dissolved Oxygen grab screening level LDNC Rocky Creek D.O. Assessment

Multiple Conditions Some streams have different DO criteria for a mix of conditions Example: Rabbit Creek DO criterion = 4.0 mg/L but DO criterion = 3.0 mg/L when flows are >1.2 cfs and < 5.95 cfs and it is May - October