Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Advertisements

Regional Policy Delegated Act on the methodology for the quality review of major projects 1 Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI.
EHMA bofcon Bo Frank Consulting June 2005 European requirements and practice in heat metering by Bo Frank EHMA.
Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
INSTITUTE FOR PRESSURE VESSEL & PLANT TECHNOLOGY VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L. Zeman Vienna University of Technology.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Source: ec.europa.eu/CEmarking CE marking makes Europe’s market yours!
Safety & Safety Documentation 2 3 Safety in three Questions Why ? Providing a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation on every undertaking, and.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission Anna Solé Mena Policy Officer - European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry.
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
Materials Bratislava 11/12/13 April 2005 Presented by Peter Hanmore For the benefit of business and people TAIEX Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Working Group 1 - Market Surveillance of pressure cookers CYPRUS PED Workshop 3-5 October 2005 Presented by: Mr. Stephanos Achillides, Labour Inspection.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement. Intentions Free movement  CE marking for vessels, accessories and assemblies Well-defined responsibilities  Manufacturer,
TÜV Slovakia, NB Working Group III. - ASSEMBLIES Bratislava, 12. April 2005 DG Enterprise and Industry, European Commission and Slovak Office of.
ISO / IEC : 2012 Conformity assessment – Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
National Legislation on in- service inspections and the PED.
PED and Swedish regulations
PED Workshop, Bratislava April 2005 PED and Presumption of Conformity Product Standards for pressure vessels, boilers and piping, and “Horizontal” standards.
06/02/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2005:2 Installations.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEL-2 INSTALLATION IN THE LAB Paolo Magagnin (BE-BI-ML) 24 – April
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
- Generals for PED matters - Definition of pressure vessel and classes - Who is who according to PED - Definition of pressure vessel + codes for XFEL -
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
Logo area 11 T Review: Safety and Codes Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Frédéric Savary, Hervé Prin, TE-MSC -Carlos Arregui,
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons learned March 17 th, 2005 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Jos Vlogaert.
Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer International Review of the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles (MQXF) for HL-LHC.
Cryogenic safety organisation at CERN
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
The application of the PED on the design codes for cryogenic equipment and future developments foreseen in this field Paris, 06/09/2016 l Hervé BARTHELEMY.
Quality assurance for Manufacturing Dressed Cavities for SPS prototype cryomodule C. Parente (HL-LHC Technical Quality Officer) Date:
Preparation of functional/engineering specifications for HL-LHC
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
HSE rules & regulations
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
HL-LHC Safety Assessment Process
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Training on standardisation
Workshop on the Implementation of the Pressure Equipment Directive
PED Conformity assessment of materials Poul Holmegaard
Inspection and Testing
Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement
WORKING GROUP 2 – Conformity Assessment
For the benefit of business and people
Non-Destructive Testing: New Methods and Qualification of Personnel
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Mattias Skafar Head of Quality Division
Quality Regulation for Mechanical Equipment RESSQ – Mech
NON-PROFIT COMPANY FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND INNOVATION IN BULDING
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Riga,
Seán Balfe Director, Sustainability and the Built Environment.
Pressure Equipment (PED):
No Deal EU Businesses Workshop: New Approach goods and the UK marking
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson ESS Accelerator Collaboration Board Meeting Trieste
Pressure Equipment (PED) --- Baltic Pressure Equipment Workshop
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Design and integration of safety equipment and safety aspects in the LHC tunnel (cryogenic safety only) Vittorio Parma Th.Otto.
Presentation transcript:

Conformity approach for Pressure Equipment for the High Luminosity LHC Project Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN Simon Marsh and Carlos Arregui, CERN HSE Unit HL-LHC Collaboration Meeting, Madrid, 13. – 16. 11. 2017

CERN Mechanical Safety Rules In accordance with its intergovernmental status, CERN establishes and updates Safety Rules to implement its Safety Policy Mechanical Safety Regulation SR-M (2015) and associated General Safety Instructions Define the minimum safety requirements related to the life cycle of pressure equipment Valid for all new equipment and equipment brought onto the CERN site from elsewhere Aligned, as far as possible, to existing standards Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

CERN Mechanical Safety Rules Design, manufacture and procurement Primarily based on European Directives for pressure equipment and transportable pressure equipment Use of harmonised European standards (EN and IEC) Use of other technical standards is subject to approval by HSE Unit CE marking Declaration of conformity Factory acceptance tests, where applicable Instruction manual Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

CERN Safety Rules for Pressure Equipment Baseline approach Design, manufacturing and testing as per EN harmonised standards Compliance with Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 2014/68/EU CE marking Exceptional Approach Equipment that does not readily fit into the context of European harmonised standards (e.g. due to equipment type, materials, area of application, geographical origin, etc.) Classification as equipment with “major Safety implications”(mSi), at the discretion of the HSE Unit, who defines the Safety requirements HSE Unit performs the conformity assessment, for all equipment categories (substitutes itself for the notified body) Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) Conformity assessment Conformity assessment modules: the higher the category, the more demanding the requirements (increase of supervision from Notified body over the whole fabrication process). Notified bodies Organisations appointed by EU states to assess conformity of a product to the ESRs before being put in the market. Categories II-IV require conformity to be assessed by external independent Notified bodies. CE marking Affixed to equipment by the manufacturer. Statement that the equipment meets requirements of all relevant Directives – Declaration of conformity. Permitted only after Notified body attests full conformity to the Directive(s), when the Notified body involvement is required. Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Application of CERN Mechanical Safety Rules – High Luminosity LHC Project WP 4: crab cavity cryostat WP 11: 11T Dipole WP 3: Inner triplet magnets Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

11T dipole cold mass WP 3: same criteria (PED Cat. IV) apply Annex II Table 2 PS = 20 bar V = 183 L PS * V = 3630 bar L > 3000 bar L Article 4, Paragraph 3 WP 3: same criteria (PED Cat. IV) apply WP 4: Niobium not officially qualified for mechanical properties at liquid Helium temperature Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Conformity assessment by HSE Requirements for HSE Safety clearance: Full compliance with the applicable Essential Safety Requirements (ESRs) in the PED Use of harmonised European standards wherever applicable (presumption of conformity) for design, manufacturing and testing, e.g. EN 13445 – Unfired pressure vessels; EN 13458 – Cryogenic vessels – static vacuum-insulated vessels; EN 10028 – Flat products made of steels for pressure purposes; … Other (inter)national standards may be used provided compliance with the ESRs is fully demonstrated Eventual non-compliances to be assessed individually. The Project shall propose compensatory measures to ensure a commensurate level of Safety Assessment of conformity to the ESRs is carried out by the HSE Unit acting as an ‘independent’ party Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Conformity assessment by HSE Design examination HSE Unit will validate the design of the equipment prior to the commencement of fabrication Manufacturer must produce technical documentation as to enable an assessment of the conformity of the equipment with the ESRs Production quality assurance HSE Unit and Project to agree on the Inspection and Test Plan, including Safety-relevant Hold Points Manufacturer to provide quality records for the manufacturing part of the QA system, such as inspection reports and test data, qualifications of personnel concerned, etc. Documentation to ensure full traceability of components and processes Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Conformity assessment by HSE Provided Safety requirements are met and Safety clearance is achieved, CE marking is not compulsory as per the Safety Rules HSE acts as de facto Notified body Involvement of external Notified body not required Safety accessories (e.g. relief valves, rupture discs) have to be, however, fully compliant with the Pressure Equipment Directive and harmonised standards Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Current status Project has made a formal request to follow the ‘Exceptions to the baseline approach’ for 21 superconducting magnet and connection cryostat variants (concerning 191 pieces of equipment, including spares) WP 3, WP 11 and HSE Unit work out the Inspection and Test Plan Currently following same approach for the Crab Cavity prototype test facility, so expectation is that this will be requested for the series production Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Thank you for your attention Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Spare Slides Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN

Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 2014/68/EU – Annex I Essential Safety Requirements - pressure equipment must be: And they qualitatively cover: As to ensure its safety when Designed Manufactured Verified Equipped and installed (if applicable) Put into service as per manufacturer’s instructions Other foreseeable conditions (including potential misuse) Design Adequate strength Appropriate Safety factors Calculation/experimental method Provisions for safe handling/operation Safety accessories against overpressure Manufacturing WPS and welding personnel to be approved by NoBo or recognised third party NDT Operating instructions Final proof test (normally hydrostatic, other tests allowed with additional measures, such as NDT) Materials Appropriate properties Covered by EN, EAM or PMA Compulsory declaration from material supplier affirming compliance with a specification. Traceability of material from receipt of material through final testing Th. Otto, S. Marsh, C. Arregui - CERN