Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Advertisements

On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
SLAC ILC Accelerator: Luminosity Production Peter Tenenbaum HEP Program Review June 15, 2005.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
8/28/07RTML EDR KOM1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
@ Fermilab May 15-17, 2006, FNAL KIRTI RANJAN – DOE Review1 ILC Simulation for RDR Kirti Ranjan Fermilab.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
Simulations Group Summary K. Kubo, D. Schulte, N. Solyak for the beam dynamics working group.
Dynamic Tuning Selected Highlights Freddy Poirier (DESY) ILC accelerator physics group meeting 28 th January 2008.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
20 July 2006 Vancouver GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Ring to Main Linac Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Placet based DFS simulations in the ILC Main Linac. Some preliminary results of error scans open for discussion Javier Resta Lopez JAI, Oxford University.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Introduction D. Schulte for K. Kubo and P. Tenenbaum.
April Recent work on Low Emittance Transport, Main Linac Paul Lebrun CD/FNAL.
Emittance preservation in the RTML of ILC and CLIC Andrea Latina (CERN) Nikolay Solyak (FNAL) LCWS University of Texas at Arlington - Oct
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
Progress in 2006 of ELAN- BDYN and INSTR D. Schulte G. Blair.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
07 June 2006Peter Tenenbaum1 Ring to Main Linac and Low Emittance Transport SLAC DOE Review Accelerator Breakout.
Status and plan of Beta-matching in Extraction line Kiyoshi Kubo.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
15-August-2005Peter Tenenbaum for WG1 Convenors 1 Low Emittance Transport and Beam Dynamics (WG1) Snowmass Meeting “I hear the roar of the big machine,
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
FACET Tests Update A. Latina, J. Pfingstner, D. Schulte,
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Update on Single-beam Tuning of the CLIC 3 TeV Traditional Lattice
Summary of Beam Dynamics Working Group
DFS Simulations on ILC bunch compressor
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS
RTML and Main Linac Design (2.6.1 and 2.7.1)
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
MULTI-BUNCH SIMULATIONS OF THE ILC FOR LUMINOSITY PERFORMANCE STUDIES
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC
Presentation transcript:

Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review Vancouver GDE meeting July, 2006 Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) and Daniel Schulte (CERN) 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Status of Accelerator Physics Group (1) Which ‘Area’ we have, covered: LET (Low Emittance Transport), so far. From DR exit to IP (and to Dump) RTML Main Linac BDS Sources (Except for the undulator section for e+ production), Damping Ring No activity in our group. Area Group coordinates all works. 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Status of Accelerator Physics Group (2) RTML Lattice design completed Tuning studies has not been done much Worm sections (turnaround, BC wigglers, etc.) Simple 1-to-1 correction will not be satisfactory SCRF in BC1 and BC2 Similar to main linac, but, Large E/E --> large dispersive effect Large off crest phase --> tight tolerances Tuning for Longitudinal phase space - not studied much Dynamic issues RF phase stability tolerances were estimated Need studies on Design and performance of feed-forward (turnaround) Design and performance of feed-back (Transverse and longitudinal) Some integration with downstream area will be necessary. (has not done yet.) Need to give more manpower to this area 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Status of Accelerator Physics Group (3) Main Linac Lattice design for performance study completed Undulator section lattice exists Other warm sections ? Not yet ? Code benchmarking shows good agreements Static tuning studies has been (relatively) well done. Especially DFS (Dispersion Free Steering) Promising results from many people and many codes But not very much for other, or additional, steering methods Bump tuning has been also shown to be effective. Present status is probably fine for RDR stage Dynamic studies Stability tolerances (vibrations, RF) are being studied. Some results but not enough Design and performance study of complete feedback have not been done. Manpower should go from static issues to dynamic issues or to other areas. 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Status of Accelerator Physics Group (4) BDS Area Group coordinate most works Lattice design completed Alignment and tuning The old algorithm, which was good for 1 seed, turned out not to be good. New algorithms are being tried. Without dynamic errors, so far Intra-train feedback Post Linac Fast Feedback IP Angle Feedback. Based on BPM in BDS before IP IP Position Feedback. Based on BPM after collision (beam-beam kick) Luminosity feedback. Position-Angle scan. Maximize Luminosity per collision Simulation Result, including Linac, BDS and IP, is promising. Inter-train feedback 1-to-1 steering is foreseen. No simulations yet 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Status of Accelerator Physics Group (5) LET integrated study: from DR exit to IP and extraction Partially integrated studies have started RTML and ML, ML and BDS Some ideas for total integrated study of whole LET. But no actual study and simulations yet. Non- LET area (Sources and DR) No activities in our group Except Undulator section for e+ production in e- main linac. 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Possibilities for Cost Reductions Accelerator Physics Possible cost reduction by the Valencia workshop: None 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Plans and Goals-1 Accelerator Physics Plans and goals of this workshop and soon later Review status. Then, Agree to move static tuning to dynamic studies for Main Linac. (if it is appropriate. Static tuning studies in RTML and BDS have still high priority.) Agree on conceptual feedback design. Review realistic errors, or standard of errors. (Static and Dynamic) Discuss ‘integrated’ simulations, and agree on what is the realistic and effective way. Review and re-define tasks and a coordinator of each task. Agree on communication method (Web pages, TV/phone meetings) 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Plans and Goals-2 Accelerator Physics Plans between this and the Valencia workshop Complete missing part of lattice design (Matching between areas. *ML has just changed.). Simulations for static tuning Mostly in RTML and BDS Simulations for dynamic errors. RTML, Main Linac and BDS, basically separately. Establish feedback system design from DR exit to IP, and simulate its performance. Start Integrated simulations. Simple ones, e.g.: Using bunch compressor for alignment of main linac. Start total integrated study Give refined numbers of tolerances and specs. alignment, vibrations, strength stabilities, BPM resolution, etc.. Start working for injector part (before DR) if required. 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort

Towards the TDR Accelerator Physics Integrated studies of LET Need more computer power Beam dynamics in Source Areas if required Need iterations of Hardware engineering and Performance study 7/19/2006 Vancouver Global Design Effort