Figure 1. Structures of fentanyl and analogs.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1. Diagrammatic presentation of appliance design, occlusal view. From: The extent of root resorption and tooth movement following the application.

Advertisements

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: An open day in the metric space

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Index Funds, Financialization, and Commodity Futures Markets

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 1. A typical chromatogram of the target compounds (Table I) by GC–NCI-MS. From: Comparison and Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides and Hexabromobiphenyls.

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Source : Norsk samfunnsvitenskapelig datatjeneste (NSD)/Database for statistikk om høyere utdanning (BDH) [Norwegian Social Science Data Service\Database.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Typical structure of polysorbate 80.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of rotenone (CAS No: , mw: 394

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Figure 1. MS<sup>E</sup> data of THC-COOH

Figure 1 A decision tree diagram for problems and its German correspondences From: Corresponding lexical domains: A new resource for onomasiological.

Figure 1. Structural formulae of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and their deuterated analogs (*, site of glucuronidation). From: Buprenorphine Detection.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1. Subdomains contributing to effort-based decision making

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph

Figure 1. Structures of Tafluprost and four related impurities.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

From: What Drives Local Food Prices

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in patients

Fig 1 Perfusion index values at different time intervals in patients with successful and failed blocks. A reference line at PI 3.3 is provided. Horizontal.

From: Where do we go from here

Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Figure 1. Dynamic supply chain model of second line tuberculosis drugs in the Western Cape Province, South Africa From: Reducing stock-outs of essential.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1 Effects of time constant and time-varying characteristics on occupational status at the start of a career and at the time of change in the time.

Fig. 1 Sample COMPRENO tree (automatically generated, no manual corrections) From: Text mining War and Peace: Automatic extraction of character traits.

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

Figure 2. Change of cooling ventilation load from 1950 to 2007.

Figure 3. Visualisation of ESMO-MCB scores for curative and non-curative setting. A & B and 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial improvement.

Figure 1. Dosage and administration route of drugs used in the BMD study. Each cycle was proposed every 28 days (‘base’ schedule) or 35 days (‘weekly’

Figure 1 Chemical structures of tested agonists

NOTE.—Error bars in all figures represent standard errors of the means. From: So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and.

Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,

Figure 3. Proposed algorithm of treatment for patients with a diagnosis of PI [prepouch ileitis]. From: Prepouch Ileitis After Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis:

Figure 1. Variance partition for the different phases of bud and cambial phenology in black spruce provenances. From: Synchronisms between bud and cambium.

Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.

Figure 1. (A–C) The chromatograms of FS extract

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Number Summaries and Box Plots.

Figure 1: Yearly net investment flows from Japan

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Structures of fentanyl and analogs. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 2. Seven-point calibration curves for the six analytes: norfentanyl (NF), acetyl fentanyl (AF), fentanyl, 2-furanyl fentanyl (2-Fu-F), 3-methylfentanyl (3-MF) and carfentanil (CF), and internal standard average areas: norfentanyl-D<sub>5</sub> (NF-D<sub>5</sub>), acetyl fentanyl-<sup>13</sup>C<sub>6</sub> (AF-<sup>13</sup>C<sub>6</sub>), fentanyl-D<sub>5</sub> and 2-furanyl fentanyl-D<sub>5</sub> (2-Fu-F-D<sub>5</sub>). The coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) are >0.99 for all six analytes. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 3. Extracted ion chromatogram of lowest calibrator for norfentanyl (A), acetyl fentanyl (B) and fentanyl (C). From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatogram of lowest calibrator for 2-furanyl fentanyl (D), 3-methylfentanyl (E) and carfentanil (F). From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 5. Five-number summary for norfentanyl concentrations in postmortem (1) (n = 46) and DUID (2) (n = 11) blood: the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 6. Five-number summary for fentanyl concentrations in postmortem (1) (n = 54) and DUID (2) (n = 8) blood: the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 7. Five-number summary for acetyl fentanyl concentrations in postmortem blood (n = 2): the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum; the dot above the boxplot indicates the mean. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 8. Five-number summary for 2-furanyl fentanyl concentrations in postmortem blood (n = 7): the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum; the dot above the boxplot indicates the mean. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 9. Five-number summary for 3-methylfentanyl concentrations in postmortem blood (n = 8): the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum; the dot above the boxplot indicates the mean. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 10. Five-number summary for carfentanil concentrations in postmortem (1) (n = 23) and DUID (2) (n = 12) blood: the minimum, Q1 (first quartile), the median, Q3 (third quartile) and the maximum. From: An LC–MS-MS Method for the Analysis of Carfentanil, 3-Methylfentanyl, 2-Furanyl Fentanyl, Acetyl Fentanyl, Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Postmortem and Impaired-Driving Cases J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41(6):473-483. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx052 J Anal Toxicol | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com