Six Sigma Green Belt Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Process Control Used to determine whether the output of a process conforms to product or service specifications. We use control charts to detect.
Advertisements

Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
Paul Prunty The 7 Basic Quality Tools ~ The DMAIC Process Continuous Improvement and … To a hammer, everything’s a nail … How many tools do you have in.
Module 13: Gage R&R Analysis – Analysis of Repeatability and Reproducibility This is a technique to measure the precision of gages and other measurement.
Measurement System Analysis Kevin B. Craner Boise State University October 6, 2003.
Premium Reduction & Delivery Improvement
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
1. 1. Product Control: to prove a particular gage is capable of distinguishing good parts from bad parts and can do so accurately every time. ◦ Ideal.
DataLyzer® Spectrum Gage Management System introduces……
Quality Control Prof. R. S. Rengasamy Department of Textile Technolgoy
10-1Quality Control William J. Stevenson Operations Management 8 th edition.
Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Six Sigma Green Belt Project
11 Explanation to Participants about this template and final presentation This template is meant as a Six Sigma / Re engineering Submission Template This.
Paper Cutting Exercise
Chapter 10 Quality Control.
Project Review Questions Ops Review Project Facilitation Process Excellence.
TM 1 ©The McGraw/Hill Companies, Inc.,2006McGraw/Hill Readily Accessible Fast Retrieval Able to Store Legacy Data Able to Store Legacy Data Dialog Boxes.
Operations Management
Process Measurement & Process Capability Variable Data
Analyze Improve Define Measure Control L EAN S IX S IGMA L EAN S IX S IGMA Chi-Square Analysis Chi-Square Analysis Chi-Square Training for Attribute Data.
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
DMAIC: Measure Robert Setaputra.
19-Feb-16 “"Dana Confidential Information - Those having access to this work may not copy it, use it or disclose the information contained within this.
Green Belt – SIX SIGMA OPERATIONAL Intro to Analyze Phase.
Quality Control Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
LSM733-PRODUCTION OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT By: OSMAN BIN SAIF LECTURE 30 1.
Chapter 10: The t Test For Two Independent Samples.
Overview Definition Measurements of process capability control
ERROR PROOFING VALIDATION LOG
Lean Six Sigma Road Map Improvement Process Road Map
How to use SPC Before implementing SPC or any new quality system, the manufacturing process should be evaluated to determine the main areas of waste. Some.
High Density Polyethylene Pipes Quality Improvement
Green Belt Project Storyboard Template See Green Belt Storyboard Checklist for required contents Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six Sigma Resources.
TQM Defined Total quality management is defined as managing the entire organization so that it excels on all dimensions of products and services that are.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Chapter 7 Process Control.
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
acceptable quality level (AQL) Proportion of defects
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template Can be used in combination with Black Belt Storyboard Submission Guide Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six.
Supplier Partnership Supplier Partnership is the discipline the strategically planning for, and managing, all interactions with third party organization.
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
10 Quality Control.
TM 720: Statistical Process Control
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
What is Project Quality Management?
DSQR Training Destructive Testing GR&R
Explanation to Participants about this template and final presentation
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP 2.
Supplier Performance Development Process
DSQR Training Measurement System Analysis
BPT 2423 – STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
ENGM 621: Statistical Process Control
Process Capability.
Project Champion: Process Owner: Organization: Project Location:
Implementing Six Sigma Quality
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
The 7 Basic Quality Tools ~ The DMAIC Process
Supplier Performance Development Process
Chapter 11 Quality Control.
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
BENEFITS OF AUTOMATED SPC
Prepared By: Mr. Prashant S. Kshirsagar (Sr.Manager-QA dept.)
Practical Assessment Project Template – DMADV
Six Sigma (What is it?) “Six sigma was simply a TQM process that uses process capabilities analysis as a way of measuring progress” --H.J. Harrington,
Measurement Systems Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Six Sigma Green Belt Project 1250-XX Covers Reduction of Raw Material Cost by Utilizing Regrind Green Belt Candidate, Tempe 07/13/07

-Define- The purpose of this project is to determine if the blending of 25% regrind into the GE Ultem 1000 will significantly change the Key dimensional and visual characteristics of the 1250-XX covers. We will focus on the 1250-05 for data collection as this is our highest volume part for this Customer in this category. If successful, this will eliminate the scrapping of the GE Ultem 1000 runners plus reduce the amount of virgin material necessary to complete the orders.

-Process Map- Material Purchasing

-Measure- MSA Instructions -Using the Zeiss CMM program 1250-05 Six Sigma Post Only, run sample parts in order. Samples are identified 1-10. Setup (See pictures below): Place 1.500” spacer in H2.(2x .750”) Place .750” spacer in H7. Position 1250-05 sample upside down on spacer with gate at 45 degree angle to the bottom left. Snug down with second .750” spacer. Follow instructions contained in program for Base Alignment criteria. Gate at 45 Degrees

-Measure- Measurement System Analysis

Measurement System Analysis cont’d. Less than 10% of the tolerance is taken up by measurement error indicating that the Zeiss CMM program is an acceptable way to accurately measure the Key characteristics. Gage R&R %Contribution Source VarComp (of VarComp) Total Gage R&R 0.0000000 0.99 Repeatability 0.0000000 0.99 Reproducibility 0.0000000 0.00 Part-To-Part 0.0000002 99.01 Total Variation 0.0000002 100.00 StdDev Study Var %Study Var %Tolerance Source (SD) (5.15*SD) (%SV) (SV/Toler) Total Gage R&R 0.0000483 0.0002488 9.95 2.49 Repeatability 0.0000483 0.0002488 9.95 2.49 Reproducibility 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.00 0.00 Part-To-Part 0.0004832 0.0024885 99.50 24.88 Total Variation 0.0004856 0.0025009 100.00 25.01 Number of Distinct Categories = 14

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Analyze- A t-Test is being used to show that there is no significant difference in the means between the 100% Virgin material and the Virgin material with 25% Regrind. With the P-value being greater than Alpha (.05), we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis (Ho) on all 3 Key Characteristics.

-Analyze- Cont’d.

-Analyze- Cont’d. Samples were run with 100% Regrind to see what effect it had on the Key Characteristics. t-Tests were used to show if a significant difference in the means had been caused by the change. With P-values remaining greater than Alpha (.05), we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis (Ho) on all 3 characteristics proving there is no significant difference in dimensional readings when 100% Regrind is used.

-Analyze- Cont’d.

-Improve- The Improvement phase will implement the usage of 25% Regrind added to the virgin material during normal production runs. The Work Order template will be updated in the Shared Directory to accurately reflect the percentage of regrind allowed. Correct usage of material will be verified during the QA Sign-In and initialed. The Bill of Materials will also be amended.

-Control- The Customer defined ‘Key Characteristics’ will be monitored after the introduction of regrind during the molding operation using a variety of tools. Sign-In and In-Process dimensional inspection criteria are controlled and communicated via the Mold Data Book. The QA Sign-In at the start of the run will include the Customers current A-079 inspection form available from their Customer Website. In-Process data will be entered into real-time SPC Charts in the Quality Control Lab and will be monitored by Quality Inspectors. Any unusual variation in the SPC Charts will be investigated. Out of specification product will be quarantined and properly labeled with an Non Conforming Material Report per the ISO standard and dispositioned accordingly.

Copy of Mold Data Book Page- Sign-In Criteria -Control- Copy of Mold Data Book Page- Sign-In Criteria Copy of Mold Data Book Page- In-process Dimensional Inspection criteria.

Sample Customer A-079 Inspection Form -Control- Sample Customer A-079 Inspection Form

-Control- Copy of Blank NCMR Sample SPC Chart

-Cost Savings-

-Cost Savings- Extrapolated to include all the 1250-XX Covers that do not specify ‘100% Virgin Only’ including -02, -05, -08, -10, -11, -12:

-Conclusion- After measuring samples run with 25% Regrind/75% Virgin and samples run with 100% Regrind, it has been concluded that there were no significant differences or changes in the Customer’s Key Dimensions. Cpk levels ranged between 2.64 and 9.94 indicating all values are well above the 2.00 Cpk of a stable 6-sigma process. Taking into account normal process variation and the likeliness that the process may drift, it can be assumed that the values will remain within the Customer’s specifications. Tensile strength testing will need to be done by the Customer to verify overall strength and integrity has not been compromised due to this change. With an annual savings of $5,687.34 for the -05 configuration, the potential cost savings if applied to all of the 1250-XX part numbers would be $13,655.25 annually.