Low energy g - g Collider for QED measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA Structural Instruments Sectoral Operational Programme „Increase of Economic Competitiveness” “Investments for Your Future”
Advertisements

High Intensity Laser Electron Scattering David D. Meyerhofer IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 11, November 1997.
RF LINAC FOR GAMMA-RAY COMPTON SOURCES C. Vaccarezza on behalf of european collaboration.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
UCLA The X-ray Free-electron Laser: Exploring Matter at the angstrom- femtosecond Space and Time Scales C. Pellegrini UCLA/SLAC 2C. Pellegrini, August.
Challenges and Opportunities of high intensity X/  photon beams for Nuclear Photonics and Muon Beams Luca Serafini – INFN-Milan, EuroGammaS scientific.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
EuroNNAc Workshop, CERN, May 2011 External Injection at INFN-LNF ( integrating RF photo-injectors with LWFA ) Luca Serafini - INFN/Milano High Brightness.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Compton Collision Scheme of E-Gammas Proposal for ELI-NP Luca Serafini – INFN Milan ELI-NP: third Pillar of Extreme Light Infrastructure (large European.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Classical and quantum electrodynamics e®ects in intense laser pulses Antonino Di Piazza Workshop on Petawatt Lasers at Hard X-Ray Sources Dresden, September.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
Assessment of Physics, Applications and Construction Issues for the Proposed Magurele Short-Pulse Facility Silviu Olariu National Institute of Physics.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
GDE FRANCE Why High brillance gun is good for the ERL scheme? And SC GUN? Alessandro Variola For the L.A.L. Orsay group.
Abstract: We present on overview of the STAR project (Southern european Thomson source for Applied Research), in progress at the Univ. of Calabria (Italy)
Advanced Compton Sources (for Nuclear Photonics) Luca Serafini – INFN/Milan Physics and Technology of Compton/Thomson X/  rays Sources - weak Compton.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
I. Chaikovska and F. Zomer (LAL, Orsay, France)
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Luca Serafini – INFN-Milan and University of Milan
In collaboration with Winthrop Brown, T.Y. Fan, Franz Kaertner,
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Brainstorming on photon-photon scattering experiment
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
Other beam-induced background at the IP
Luca Serafini – INFN-Milan and University of Milan
Gu Qiang For the project team
IRIDE: The Photon Machine
Musings For Future Challenge
17/10/2016 Reserch Activity Report 6D Phase Space Electron Beam Analysis And Optimization For Rf Linac Based Inverse Compton Scattering Radiation Sources.
Conveners: L.Serafini,F. Villa
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
MIT Compact X-ray Source
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Free Electron Lasers (FEL’s)
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Cornell Injector Performance
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
Using a Bessel Light Beam as an Ultra-short Period Helical Undulator
Peking University: Jinqing Yu, Ronghao Hu, Haiyang Lu & Xueqing Yan
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
Lecture 2: Invariants, cross-section, Feynman diagrams
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Val Kostroun and Bruce Dunham
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Serge Kalmykov, UNL (WG 6, Tuesday, 10/26/2017) vg +15 fs
X-band Linac (NLC) based g-g collider
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Status of ELI Beamlines
DANE Compton ring for ultra high flux photons in the 100 KeV-10 MeV energy range D. Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati)
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
EX18710 (大阪大学推薦課題) 課題代表者  矢野 将寛 (大阪大学大学院 工学研究科) 研究課題名
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Presentation transcript:

Low energy g - g Collider for QED measurements Luca Serafini – INFN Milano Why a Photon-Photon elastic/inelastic scattering experiment? Fundamental test for QED never observed so far (elastic scattering with real photons, pure light-to-light interaction) Why now? Future availability of tunable/polarized/mono-chromatic/high-phase-space-density MeV-class photon beams mutuated from Nuclear Photonics (ELI-NP-GBS, HiGS, etc) The Challenge: run a high luminosity collider at 1 MeV center of mass energy to sample photon-photon total cross section spanning from atto-barns to hundreds of milli-barns Fundamental HEP research with a Light Source! EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Feymann tree-level diagrams, all imply interaction e. m. field - el Feymann tree-level diagrams, all imply interaction e.m. field - el. charge EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015 Courtesy Oliver Pike

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015 Courtesy Oliver Pike

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015 Courtesy Oliver Pike

Photon-photon scattering is a probe into the structure of the vacuum of QFT The QFT vacuum holds the key to the understanding of renormalization in QFTs. Different vacua are possible, and the observation of photon-photon scattering would provide important clues on the actual structure of the QFT vacuum. Feymann fermion loop diagram Photon-photon scattering at low energy is very difficult to observe, the total cross-section is extremely small. The total unpolarized scattering cross section predicted by QED is Where This evaluates to a very small number with low energy (≈ 1 eV) photons, however it increases as the sixth power of photon energy. EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Tunability! Narrow bdw! optical transparency of the Universe Thomson cross sect. = 670 mbarn peak cross-section, ≈1.6 µbarn at cross-section for unpolarized initial state (average over initial polarizations) Tunability! Narrow bdw! optical transparency of the Universe EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

threshold of the Breit-Wheeler process 1 nb-1 10 pb-1 integrated luminosity corresponding to a bare minimum of about 100 scattering events (total). ECM ≈ 630 keV 880 keV 13 MeV 140 MeV Bethe-Heitler EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Gamma ray beam polarization is a must! Unpolarized and (circularly) polarized initial photons. The scattering of polarized photons yields additional information CM energy (MeV) + + and - - + - and - + Gamma ray beam polarization is a must! EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Differential Cross Section is larger at large scattering angles for lower photon energies – easier detection EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Differential Cross Section is smaller at large scattering angles for higher photon energies – more difficult detection EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

We evaluated the event production rate of several schemes for photon-photon scattering, based on ultra-intense lasers, brehmstralhung machines, Nuclear Photonics gamma-ray machines, etc, in all possible combinations: collision of 0.5 MeV photon beams is the only viable solution to achieve 1 nbarn-1 in a reasonable measurement time. Colliding 2 ELI-NP 10 PW lasers under construction (ready in 2018), hn=1.2 eV, f=1/60 Hz, we achieve (Ecm=3 eV): LSC=6.1045, cross section= 6.10-64, events/sec=10-19 Colliding 1 ELI-NP 10 PW laser with the 20 MeV gamma-ray beam of ELI-NP-GBS we achieve (Ecm=5.5 keV): LSC=6.1033, cross section=10-41, events/sec = 10-8 EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Colliding a high power Brehmstralhung 50 keV X-ray beam (unpolarized, 100 kW on a mm spot size) with ELI-NP-GBS 20 MeV gamma-ray beam (Ecm=2 MeV) we achieve: LSC=6.1022, cross section=1 mbarn, events/s = 10-8 4) Colliding 2 gamma-ray 0.5 MeV beams, carrying 109 photons per pulse at 100 Hz rep rate, with focal spot size at the collision point of about 2 mm, we achieve: LSC=2.1026, cross section = 1 mbarn, events/s=2.10-4, events/day=18, 1 nanobarn-1 accumulated after 3.2 months of 5/24 machine running. Colliding 2 LCLS-2 10 keV 1013 photons at 1 MHz we would achieve: LSC=8.1038, cross section=1 atto-barn, events/s = 8.10-4 EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

A Photon-Photon Scattering Machine based on twin Photo-Injectors and Compton Sources Mono-chromatic High Brilliance micron-spot psec Gamma Ray beams are needed for pursuing Photon-Photon scattering experiments at high luminosity ⇒ scaling laws Similar to those generated by Compton (back-scattering) Sources for Nuclear Physics/Photonics (mini) Colliders similar to g-g colliders, but at low energy (in the 0.5-2 MeV range): issue with photon beam diffraction! Best option: twin system of X-band 200 MeV photo-injectors with Compton converters and amplified J-class ps lasers (ELI-NP-GBS/STAR) – single bunch no laser re-circulation EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Pointing stability at 2 Compton Sources Strawman Design of Photon-Photon Scattering machine based on X-Band SLAC RF Photo-Injector + SLAC new X-band (Tantawi-Dolgashev) RF cavities + J-class Yb:Yag 100 Hz collision laser (Amplitude/ELI-NP-GBS&EuroGammaS) Electron beam operation in single bunch – focusability to 3 micron spot size at Compton Interaction Point Pointing stability at 2 Compton Sources Control Moeller scattering of counter-propagating electrons EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Formulas for photon scattering Luminosity extensively tested vs. ELI-NP-GBS simulations EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Formula for Lsc is valid if distance between 2 Compton conversion IP’s is smaller than b* Example g=300 sS=3 mm b*=1 mm EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

and X-band RF structures A.Bacci – first attempt, SLAC X-band RF gun and X-band RF structures 250 pC, 3 mm spot size EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

E. Milotti et al. EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

1 nanobarn-1 accumulated after 3.2 months of we can achieve: LSC=2.1026, cross section = 1 mbarn, events/s=2.10-4, events/day=18, 1 nanobarn-1 accumulated after 3.2 months of 5/24 machine running. EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Clear Scientific Case on Fundamental QED and QFT CONCLUSIONS Clear Scientific Case on Fundamental QED and QFT Technical Solution for the Machine (challenging) Uniqueness: a HEP experiment performed with a Light Source Many Thanks to: E. Milotti, D. Babusci, A. Bacci, C. Curceanu, M. Iliescu, I. Drebot, D. Palmer, B. Spataro, E. Tassi, D. Micieli EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Recent references on possible photon-photon scattering schemes Recent references on low-energy light-magnetic field scattering (photon-photon scattering between real infrared photons and virtual magnetic field photons) F. Della Valle, E. Milotti, A. Ejlli, G. Messineo, L. Piemontese, G. Zavattini, U. Gastaldi, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso: "First results from the new PVLAS apparatus: A new limit on vacuum magnetic birefringence", accepted for publication in Physical Review D F. Della Valle, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, E. Milotti, R. Pengo, L. Piemontese, G. Ruoso, G. Zavattini: "Measurements of vacuum magnetic birefringence using permanent dipole magnets: the PVLAS experiment", New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 053026 Recent references on possible photon-photon scattering schemes A. Torre, G. Dattoli, I. Spassovsky, V. Surrenti, M. Ferrario, and E. Milotti: "A double FEL oscillator for photon-photon collisions", Journal of the Optical Society of America B 30 (2013) 2906-2914 E. Milotti, F. Della Valle, G. Zavattini, G. Messineo, U. Gastaldi, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, D. Babusci, C .Curceanu, M. Iliescu, C. Milardi: "Exploring quantum vacuum with low-energy photons", Int. J. of Quantum Information 10 (2012) 1241002 Historical reference on photon-photon scattering opportunities Paul L. Csonka, “Are photon-photon scattering experiments feasible?”, Phys. Lett. 24B (1967) 625 EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

K. Homma and K. Nakajima https://www.izest.polytechnique.edu/izest-home/izest-events/09-2014-izest-eli-np- conf-extreme-light-s-new-horizons-paris-france/slides/slides-317952.kjsp?RF=1412352802227 EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Envelopes of the laser beam (dotted line), first electron beam (for Compton back-scattering, dashed) deflected after collision with laser to clear the second electron beam (solid line). laser envelope envelope of first electron beam deflected x [mm] Laser intensity distribution and first electron bunch at Compton back-scattering Collision point collision point second electron beam envelope to collision incoming gamma photon beam envelope z [mm] EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Enlarged view (zoomed out over 1 cm in z and +-200 microns in x) to show laser envelope clearance and deflecting dipole poles (0.3 T B field applied). laser envelope x [mm] envelope of first electron beam deflected collision point second electron beam envelope to collision incoming gamma photon beam envelope z [mm] EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Illya Drebot with CAIN – single bunch mode 100 Hz no laser re-circul. EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Multiphoton Breit-Wheeler scattering was observed at SLAC. However, as clearly stated also in the paper, “The multiphoton Breit􏰊-Wheeler reaction becomes accessible for n > 3 laser photons of wavelength 527 nm colliding with a 29.2 GeV photon􏰁“. Indeed, the straghtforward two-photon Breit-Wheeler reaction has never been observed. The difference may appear minor, however it isn’t. Multi photon scattering has a considerably more complex kinematics, and the dynamical calculation clearly requires more than one internal propagator in the Feynman diagram. But more than that, Breit-Wheeler scattering — be it multi photon or not — is described by a simple tree-level diagram at the lowest perturbative order, while photon+photon —> photon+photon, needs a fermion loop at the lowest level, and thus is a true probe of the quantal nature of field theory. Edoardo Milotti - INFN-Trieste EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

STAR X-Ray Imaging STAR Nuclear Photonics X (keV) hn=2.4 eV hn=1.2 eV g (MeV) EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

c) 1 J Yb:Yag 100 Hz collision laser (0.8 J expected at ELI-NP-GBS) a) 200 MeV/m peak cathode field of X-Band SLAC RF Photo-Injector (recently proven) b) 100 MeV/m SLAC (Tantawi/Dolgashev/Spataro) new X-band RF cavities (recently demonstrated) c) 1 J Yb:Yag 100 Hz collision laser (0.8 J expected at ELI-NP-GBS) PH2SC Electron beam operation in single bunch – focusability to 3 micron spot size at Compton Interaction Point Pointing stability at 2 Compton Sources Deflection of counter-propagating electron bunches to avoid e-/e- interactions EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Luminosity in collision EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Formulas for energy of Compton scattered photons, Luminosity, # scattered photons, rms bandwidth, angle, etc (1) (2) EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

(3) (4) EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

(10) (11) EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

(12) EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Definitions of Quantities UL = Laser pulse energy Q = electron bunch charge fRF = RF rep rate nRF = #bunches per RF pulse f = collision angle (<<1) f = 0 for head-on collision st = laser pulse length w0 = laser focal spot size hn = laser photon energy [eV] sx = electron bunch spot size at collision point N.B. all sigma’s and angles are intended as rms, all distributions are assumed as gaussians in (phase) space and time EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

FEL resonance condition (magnetostatic undulator ) Example : for lR=1A, lw=2cm, E=7 GeV (electromagnetic undulator ) Example : for lR=1A, l=0.8mm, E=25MeV laser power laser spot size EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Courtesy V. Petrillo – Univ. of Milan The Physics of Compton Inverse Scattering is quite straightforward 3 regimes: a) Elastic, Thomson b) Quasi-Elastic, Compton with Thomson cross-section c) Inelastic, Compton, recoil dominated Courtesy V. Petrillo – Univ. of Milan EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

FELs (pure g2) X/g [MeV] D Te [MeV] g-g Colliders Polarized Positrons Nuclear Photonics D Thomson X-rays 1 GeV 1 TeV Te [MeV] EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Brilliance of Lasers and X-ray sources ELI 12.4 1.24 0.124 l (nm) BELLA FLASH Thomson/Compton Sources EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Courtesy V. Zamfir – ELI-NP ELI-NP γ beam: the quest for narrow bandwidths (from 10-2 down to 10-3) Courtesy V. Zamfir – ELI-NP EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Extreme Light Infrastructure ELI on ESFRI list ELI-PP 2007-2010 December 2009 (EC) 3 Pillars (Structural Funds): CZECH Rep: Beamlines HUNGARY: Short Pulses ROMANIA: Nuclear Physics Courtesy of Victor Zamfir EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

ELI – RO Nuclear Physics Courtesy Victor Zamfir “Extreme Light” two 10 PW APOLLON-type lasers, output energy higher than 200 J, 20-30 fs, intensity higher than 1023W/cm2 the most brilliant γ beam, <19.5 MeV, BW:10-3 produced by Compton scattering on a 600 MeV electron beam (LINAC) Courtesy Victor Zamfir EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

Courtesy Victor Zamfir Two Apollon 10 PW Lasers 280 Meuro 80 Mil. Lasers and beam trans. 60 Mil. γ beam 60 Mil. Construction 24 Mil. Experiments 23 Mil. Personnel ELI-NP Building Map view 700 MeV RF Linac + Compton-Source EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015 Courtesy Victor Zamfir

ELI-NP-GammaBeamSystem designed by EuroGammaS EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015

108 Authors, 327 pages Published on ArXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3669 EAAC-2015, WG4, Elba (Italy), Sept. 15th 2015