Measurement of jet properties with the ATLAS detector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low x meeting, Sinai Alice Valkárová on behalf of H1 collaboration LOW x meeting 2005, Sinaia H1 measurements of the structure of diffraction.
Advertisements

Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
ISDM 2005, Kromeriz Kamil Sedlak, Jets in photoproduction at HERA 1 Jets in Photoproduction & at low Q 2 at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Frederik Rühr, KIP Heidelberg ATLAS Jets: Measurements, Calibration and Studies Frederik Rühr, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Heidelberg Universität Heidelberg.
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Direct di-  Tevatron On behalf of the & Collaborations Liang HAN University of Science & Technology of China (USTC)
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
1 Forward Jet/  0 Production in DIS at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations ICHEP August 2004, Beijing Didar Dobur, University of Freiburg.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Improved measurements of the b quark mass at LEP María José Costa (IFIC-València) ICHEP 2002 Amsterdam Motivations to measure m b at M Z. Observables sensitive.
QCD at the Tevatron M. Martínez IFAE-Barcelona Results from CDF & D0 Collaborations.
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
KIT High Pt Jet Studies with CMS On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Andreas Oehler University of Karlsruhe (KIT) DIS 2009 XVII International Workshop on.
A T : novel variable to study low transverse momentum vector boson production at hadron colliders. Rosa María Durán Delgado The University of Manchester.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Jet production and αs measurements at CMS
Azimuthal Decorrelations and
Flavor decomposition at LO
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Energy Dependence of the UE
Tevatron results on Multi-Parton Interactions
Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Dijet Azimuthal Distributions at DØ
Open Heavy Flavour Production at HERA
Color Glass Condensate : Theory and Phenomenology
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares
Lake Louise Winter Institute
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
Jet fragmentation results at CDF
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton
Introduction to Monte Carlo Event Generators
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics Lecture 2: perturbative QCD (II)
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of jet properties with the ATLAS detector Hugo Beauchemin Tufts University Put photo of team. DIS2016, DESY, Germany, April 13th 2016

Introduction

The strong interaction intervenes in various ways and at various scales in every single event at the LHC Matrix element of interest Gluon emission (ISR/FSR) Proton structure Fragmentation and hadronization Underlying event Long distance physics Short distance physics Long distance physics We can make robust predictions! Not so sure…

Factorization theorem: The probabilities for short-distance and long-distance processes factorize The long-distance factors are universal and can be empirically obtained from ancillary measurements. Ok, at first order we are fine: even if there is a regime where QCD becomes non-perturbative, and even if every single events will involve such long distance physics effect, factorization theorem allows us to make robust predictions at the LHC for any processes of interest. There are nevertheless what I would call second order effects that could be quite annoying, and which requires a sophisticated measurement program at the LHC. Evolution equations (e.g. DGLAP), analogous to b-functions for aS, account for transition from one scale to the other

These QCD predictions involve assumptions, approximations, and phenomenological modeling impacting final state selections and differential cross section predictions Parton shower accounting for the effect of evolution on final states: Soft and collinear approximations (where QCD radiation is enhanced) Leading order kernel functions Choice of ordering parameter Parton distribution function (PDF): Uncertainties on measurements used to extract structure functions Modeling of structure functions at Q0 Fragmentation function: Gaussian modeling of D(x,s) at small x Supplemented by hadronization model

Predict different number of charged particle within jets and different distribution of the charged-particle energies in jets. These effects implies possibly large uncertainties affecting the modeling or measurement of: Observables likes Mjj, ETmiss-related, jet gap-related Other infrared sensitive observables Precision beyond 1/Qn for infrared safe observables

Measuring observables sensitive to these effects allows to: Determine best model/calculations for predictions Tune fragmentation and FSR parameters or PDF fit. Assuming PDF, measuring observable sensitive to the transition from parton to jet can be used to: Tag jet flavor Distinguish between q-jet and g-jet Distinguish between qq-resonance and QCD background

ATLAS measurements: Jet-charge and charged-particle multiplicity of jets Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 052003 arXiv:1602.00988 [hep-ex]

Jet charged-particle multiplicity An observable that is sensitive to longer-distance QCD effects To be measured for various PT track threshold, thus regulating the sensitivity to soft particles This observable depends on the parton that initiated the jet Gluon jets contain more particles than quark jets because of larger color charge

Jet-charge Definition: The momentum-weighted charge sum of particles in jets is sensitive to the electric charge of quarks and gluons from jets Definition: Measure mean mQJ and standard deviation sQJ vs PT jets regulates the sensitivity of the jet charge to FSR and fragmentation Low k enhances contribution from low-PT particles k = 0.5 is the most sensitive value to parton charge initiating the jet

The average jet charge mQJ increases with jet-PT due to an increase in up-flavor from PDF at the origin of hard jets Also more visible when the soft radiation is not suppressed Distribution varies with rapidity due to higher up/down than gluon contributions in more forward regions Discrepancies with predictions, meaning that large-distance QCD effects need to be better understood.

Similar observations about data to predictions agreement from measurements of the charged-particle multiplicity <ncgh> in jets

Sensitivity to PDF Each PDF set has its own underlying event tune, factorizing out these effects from interpretation Better agreement Pythia (LO generator) with LO PDF (CTEQ6L1) than with any NLO PDF, but still has wrong shape Standard Deviation of jet charge sQJ well described by all. Decoupled effects from FSR and fragmentation to a large extent

Sensitivity to parton emission (FSR), fragmentation and hadronization Discrepancy between data and MC is not fully explained by PDF Sensitivity to parton emission (FSR), fragmentation and hadronization Compare data to different hadronization and FSR predictions : Compare pythia 6 default tune with RadHi and RadLo tunes to quantify how the observable is sensitive to QCD FSR The scale in as regulating FSR is changed by ½ and 2 for these two tunes Realistic tune with some of the effects being absorbed in tuning Compare Pythia 8 with Herwig++ to assess the sensitivity to fragmentation parameters and hadronization model

Significant sensitivity to fragmentation and hadronization Average jet-charge mQJ distribution The low k mQJ observable is insensitive to FSR FSR effects are drown in the sensitivity of the observable to soft particle from infrared processes Significant sensitivity to fragmentation and hadronization

Average jet-charge mQJ distribution Sensitivity to FSR increases with k Suppression of soft radiation makes the jet charge distribution more sensitive to the modeling of the energy fraction of leading emission

Jet charge standard deviation sQJ Fluctuation decreases as soft radiation is suppressed Because we see less charge Significant sensitivity to FSR at large k, but not to fragmentation or hadronization. Good for FSR tuning Hard to disentangle FSR from fragmentation at low k

Multiplicity of charged particles <nchg> in jets FSR: too much radiation in the main pythia P2012 tune Insensitive to underlying event pythia tune (AU2 vs Monash), but not to Herwig corresponding tunes (EE3 vs EE5) Best description at low jet-PT by Pytha 8 A14 tune, but at high jet-PT by Herwig EE5 tune ATLAS charged-particle multiplicity in jets of PT<50 GeV included in A14 tune, and lower as FSR

mQJ differences between up and down Using flavor-fraction information in PDF and matrix element calculation, we can extract mQJ and <nchg> for various parton flavor initiating the hard jets mQJ differences between up and down <ncharged> differences between quark and gluon

Conclusion

ATLAS performed a comprehensive study of jet-charge and jet charged-particle multiplicity sensitive to the transition between parton and hadrons Sensitive to PDF, FSR, fragmentation and hadronization Jet charge mean mQJ , and standard deviation sQJ, and jet charged-particle multiplicity <nchg> are not well described LO PDFs provide a better description for LO generators, but cannot fully explain data to prediction discrepancies Low k mQJ is good to test/tune fragmentation functions High k and are good to test/tune QCD radiation <nchg> infrared sensitive to underlying event modeling These observables can be used to separate between jets of different parton origins

Back-up slides

Pythia (8.175) vs Herwig++ (2.63) Hadronization: Lund string (linear confinement) Hadronization Cluster (preconfinement) -Shower ordering: determine evolution of resolved QCD emission -Linear confinement: color field stretching between quark-anti-quark pair like a string breaking spontaneously in segment of q-qbar pairs. -Preconfinement: pair of color connected neighbor partons with a universal and Q2-independent asymptotic mass distribution suggesting particles. Check ref 47 and 48 of jet-charge for the discussion on use of NLO PDF on LO ME. pT-ordered showers (natural for a shower partly based on dipole approach) Showers ordering: (nLL resummation) angular-ordered showers (deal with quantum interference)

Pythia (8.175) vs Herwig++ (2.63) PDF: Different can be used in generators, but as default: CT10 (NLO) -Shower ordering: determine evolution of resolved QCD emission -Linear confinement: color field stretching between quark-anti-quark pair like a string breaking spontaneously in segment of q-qbar pairs. -Preconfinement: pair of color connected neighbor partons with a universal and Q2-independent asymptotic mass distribution suggesting particles. Check ref 47 and 48 of jet-charge for the discussion on use of NLO PDF on LO ME. CTEQ6L1 (LO) AU2 & A14 tunes (Many parameters) Multiple interactions: (Each generator is tuned for different PDF on Run-1 ATLAS data) EE3-EE5 tunes (Fewer parameters)

Event topology I Measure <ncgh>, mQJ and sQJ in dijet events with balanced PT More sensitive to hard scatter jets and suppresses MPI Measure impact of large-distance effects on short-distance processes Less experimental and theoretical confusion with close-by jets Hard-scattered quarks and gluons more cleanly matched to jet

Event topology II Separate central from more forward jets because jet flavor depends on rapidity Forward jets are less likely to come from gluon, than central jets Forward jets are limited to |h| < 2.1 to detect all tracks Define jet flavor from the highest energy parton within DR < 0.4 of particle-level jet

Unfolding Detector effects distort the underlying physics distribution The average effect per jet-PT bin is about 10-20% Reconstructed observable distributions are unfolded to produce results directly comparable to theoretical calculations Unfolding accounts for fake, efficiency, and resolution effects Unfold for <ncgh>, mQJ and sQJ and PT Iterative Bayesian technique Dominant source of uncertainty in low jet-PT bins

Variation of jet flavor origin with jet-PT and for different rapidity regions Gluon and sea-quark fractions decrease with jet-PT Up and down contributions increase with jet-PT Up increases faster than down with Jet-PT, but this effect get attenuated in forward regions

Sensitivity to PDF does not depend on the amount of soft particles accounted for in the jet-charge definition: PDFs impact leading jet charge mostly through flavor fraction Decoupled effects from FSR and fragmentation to a large extent Some systematic trend might be observed with Herwig, but not significant