Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Professional Development and Appraisal System
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Differentiated Supervision
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
ADEPT Framework
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Educator Plans Overview
New Teacher Induction.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Updates.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Information
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Bradley County Schools Robert Brittingham Department of Instruction Evaluations & Licensure
Presentation transcript:

Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation Instructional Practice Improving Student Growth through Improved Instruction

System Requirements Designed to support effective instruction and student learning growth. Results used when developing district and school level improvement plans. Results used to identify professional development for instructional personnel and school administrators.

Performance Levels There are four levels of performance: Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement, or for instructional personnel in the first 3 years of employment, Developing Unsatisfactory

Highly Effective Indicates performance that consistently meets an extremely high quality standard. The individual's performance exceeds the typical standard of normal level service and is held in high regard by supervisors and colleagues.

Effective Indicates performance that consistently meets a high quality standard. The individual’s performance meets the district’s expectations and is consistent with the experience level of the employee. Effective is not a synonym for satisfactory.

Needs Improvement/Developing Indicates performance that requires additional attention to ensure an acceptable level of proficiency. The individual’s performance is not consistently characteristic of the requirements for the position and experience of the employee. There must be written support regarding how performance is to be improved.

Needs Improvement/Developing The rating of Developing may only be assigned to instructional personnel in need of improvement in the first three years of employment. There must be written support regarding how performance is to be improved.

Unsatisfactory Indicates performance that does not meet minimum requirements of the position and the level of performance commensurate with the experience of the employee. There must be written support regarding how performance is to be improved.

Domain 1 Classroom Strategies and Behaviors, weighted at 60% of the Instructional Practice portion of the evaluation and includes the following components: Classroom Management ( 4 indicators) Direct Instruction (7 indicators) Assessment/Evaluation (3 indicators) Technology (1 indicators)

Domain 2 Planning and Preparation, weighted at 13 % of the Instructional Practice portion of the evaluation and includes the following component: Planning and Preparation (4 indicators)

Domain 3 Reflecting on Teaching, weighted at 9% of the Instructional Practice portion of the evaluation and includes the following component: Professional Learning (2 indicators)

Domain 4 Collegiality and Professionalism, weighted at 18% of the Instructional Practice portion of the evaluation in includes the following components: Collaboration (2indicators) Professional Responsibilities (4 indicators)

Instructional Practice Instructional Practice accounts for 66.7% of the overall evaluation rating. Each indicator is rated on the performance levels of Highly Effective, Effective, Needs Improvement/Developing, or Unsatisfactory. A rating will be assigned to each domain and an Instructional Practice rating will be determined.

Observations Principals and other trained observers will conduct formal, informal, and possibly walkthrough observations. Formal observations will be at least 30 minutes (elementary) or the full class period. Informal observations are a minimum of 15 minutes A walkthrough observation is no less than 3 minutes. Teachers will receive feedback in some form following an observation.

Final Summative The final summative rating is based on the Instructional Practice rating and the Student Growth rating. For the 2016-17 school year Instructional Practice will count for 66.7% of the overall rating and Student Growth will count for 33.3% of the overall rating since only one year of data will be used.

Required Observations 1st Year Teacher—3 formal observations: 1 in first 20 days, 1 by the end of the 1st semester, and 1 during the 2nd semester. 2nd & 3rd Year Teacher—1 formal observation per semester and 1 informal observation during the year Regular Teachers (4+ years)-1 formal observation per year and 2 informal observations per year.

Observation information Classroom walkthroughs are not required but may be conducted as an observation Pre-planning conferences are not required Written feedback must be provided to the teacher within 7 days of the observation No observations will occur until 2 weeks after an employee receives written feedback except in instances of concern for student safety or about professional responsibilities

Student Growth & Achievement Teachers in the first year of employment will have a student growth and achievement rating calculated at the end of each semester. Teachers beyond the first year will have a student growth & achievement rating calculated at the end of the school year. More information concerning evaluation can be found in the Instructional Personnel Contract, Article XII.

Questions ?