Cost & Schedule between Shaft and Adit for Access of Detector Hall

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin.

Advertisements

Kitakami IR Access Discussions T. Markiewicz/SLAC 13 May 2014 SiD Meeting / AWLC Fermilab.

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)

Michael Swinford Bechtel International Project Director, Autostrada Transilvania Friday 22 nd October 2010 Albanian Motorway Project A New Direction.

Tunnelling Methods.

Design Parameters.

Henderson Mine Site. Henderson Mine Central Campus Shaft Collar Elev 10,400 ft Shaft Bottom Elev 7,500 ft LA Ramp Primary Access Ramp 3600 ft Central.

1 STATUS REPORT JINR G. Shirkov, ILCW08, November 17, 2008.

3/2011 CFS BTR Global Design Effort 1 Americas Region Civil Design Tom Lackowski.

DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.

Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.

Motion The motion of an object can be described by its position, direction of movement, and speed. How do we know this flag is in motion?

Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Status and Overview.

Laughton 7/04 Long Baseline Neutrino Program Tunneling Chris Laughton, Fermilab.

LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.

CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group.

1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.

Global Design Effort - CFS SiD Collaboration Meeting - SLAC 1 VERTICAL ACCESS ILC IR LAYOUT for SiD and ILD CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.

LCWS14 - Belgrade October 6-10, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, M Miyahara, J Osborne.

ILC experimental area - How to ‘develop’ CFS details for TDP (cavern size, number of shafts, HVAC, EL spec etc) ? - KEK site specific issues CFS V.Kuchler.

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Detector Hall Configuration Overview New baseline (Hybrid A’) proposed.

Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF LBNF/DUNE Logistics Workshop Summary Mike Headley August 19, 2015.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Modification of WLTC Ver.5 Prepared by Japan 13 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 June.

November 17, st XFEL / ILC Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL Design Effort The Current ILC Twin Tunnel Design Wilhelm Bialowons and Nicholas Walker · MPY.

LHC scheduling applied to CLIC and ILC TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009 K. Foraz K. Foraz - CERN TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009.

TDR Status of Asian CFS Team Part II: The ILC Baseline Reference Ch.SectionSubsectionsAuthor1 st draft 112: Asian Region Siting Studies Overview Location.

10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.

Global Design Effort - CFS ILC10 Beijing, March, Single-Tunnel Accelerator Configuration Of Asian Region Atsushi Enomoto (KEK)

22 October Summary: Updating of the activities carried out on-site (Done) in SEPTEMBER List activities on going (Next steps) and scheduled for OCTOBER.

General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:

Construction Schedule for Baseline and Hybrid A’ Configuration 1 5 th September, 2014 J-POWER MDI-CFS Meeting - Ichinoseki City, JAPAN.

Europe / CERN studies for SB2009 ILC Re-Baseling J.Osborne CERN (CFS & CES) 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 28 September - 4 October 2009.

March 22, –  Design Concept & Hall Layout  Access Tunnel  Top heading Tunnel  Displacement of detector hall by push-pull operation.

M EGATON M ODULAR M ULTI -P URPOSE N EUTRINO D ETECTOR Ventilation Cooling Mark A. LaurentiMarch 2002 Modular Configuration.

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site 2011/11/30 Yasuhiro CFS Webex meeting 1.

Conventional Facilities for the Far Detector Options Assumptions and Cost Estimates T. Lundin April 25, 2012 LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop - 25, 26 - April-2012.

Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Far Site Conventional Facilities (FSCF) Scope and Interface Overview Tracy Lundin as borrowed from Headley & Willhite.

SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELS

WP 17.1 Civil Engineering Platform height / vs option Status on M. Manfredi on behalf of WP17.1 team.

Construction Beam Tunnel

1 South Parade, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN1 2DY, UK Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) ALAN AULD GROUP LTD The design of a pan-European.

Siting/Conventional Facilities Jonathan Hunt PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9 March 2015.

Access Hall Study for Cryogenics High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK- LC Project Office Masanobu Miyahara 2 Nov

1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.

Civil Design for Tunnel Case Studies

Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions

FCC Underground Infrastructure

Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES

Updated Design of Detector Hall

Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting

FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne, Jo Stanyard, Matt Stuart(SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) Cost & schedule Phase 3 - specification 10th May 2017.

Marco Oriunno (SLAC), March 12, 2014 MDI WG

Experimental hall design in Japanese site

$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation

CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CFS works

Visit for more Learning Resources

Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site

Hybrid Access Optional Study

Detector hall in mountain regions

Status of Cryogenics Facilities Design

CLIC Civil Engineering Update

Detector hall in mountain regions

Kitakami IR Access Discussions

Reedy River Basin Sewer Tunnel Project Update

8-10 April 2014 CFS-ADI Joint Meeting

McCaw School of Mines Vocabulary

Japan’s position and proposal on draft of -gtr ２

Life Cycle Costing.

Presentation transcript:

Cost & Schedule between Shaft and Adit for Access of Detector Hall SiD/ILD Engineering & Detector Interface Working Meeting Dec.13, 2011

Outline In case of Japanese mountain site, Construction Schedule Construction Cost

Assumed site Zoom the above circle area

Site Image Japanese Mountain Site Portal EL358m Portal EL160m Shaft L=223m Construction Adit L=410m EL131m EL135m Adit L=980m, <= 7% inclination EL98.5m Detector Hall

Summary Schedule

Summary Cost (Direct Construction Cost basis)

Assumption of Schedule and Excavation Speed Contents Shaft Adit Portal location EL 358 m EL 160 Tunnel spec. Φ 18 m w= 11 m, h=11 m Connecting point of D/H EL 135 m (Crown level of D/H) EL 98.5 m (Bottom level of D/H) Length of shaft/adit 223 m 980 m Excavation speed 7 m/month 83 m/month As for “excavation speed”, Shaft: considered construction cycle time (based on actual record and Japanese standard of the past) Adit: Japanese standard basis

Cycle Time (for Shaft)

Japanese Standard (for Adit) (Shown in the GDE-CFS meeting on 13 October, 2011 at KEK)

Assumption of Cost Estimation Cost estimation is calculated on the basis of the direct construction cost Preparation work is excluded Indirect cost is excluded Adit Japanese standard (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) is adopted Already shown in the GDE-CFS meeting on 13 Oct, 2011 at KEK Shaft There is NOT a standard for cost estimation Cycle time for excavation is considered by reference to a past record and Japanese standard

Japanese standard (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism)

Unit cost for adit (Shown in the GDE-CFS meeting on 13 October, 2011 at KEK) Unit cost for tunnel excavation

Example of equipments for Adit construction Drilling by using Drill Jumbo Mucking

Feature of cost constitution for shaft

Equipments (example) Muck Kibble Scaffold for shaft excavation Concrete Kibble Excavation platform Hoisting machine Operator control panel

Summary of comparison between shaft and adit Construction speed is low, because excavation muck should be hove up to the ground surface, and equipments should be escaped from the face for the blast etc. Equipment cost account for the most part of the total excavation cost <Adit> Construction speed is fast compared with shaft Cost is low even if a certain amount of the tunnel length