Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
Advertisements

PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…
N-1 Plots. 2 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Lead Photon – More plots in Backup.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
1 Analysis of Prompt Diphoton Production at the Large Hadron Collider. Andy Yen Mentor: Harvey Newman Co-Mentors: Marat Gataullin, Vladimir Litvine California.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech QCD Meeting 03 July 2007.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech WG3/WG4 Meeting 29 June 2007.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS HEEPP Group Meeting 24 March 2007.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
1 RS-1 G  750GeV 0.1 Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
1 High energy photon pairs: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS Group Meeting 13June 2007.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Quark Compositeness Study and Progress Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh C. Choudhary & Debajyoti Choudhury Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Data results for inclusive all-hadronic (RA  with 318 nb -1 SUSY Hadronic/GMSB Meeting [C. Rogan et al.] Data Plots Towards.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Alex Melnitchouk DPF conference - May Search for Fermiophobic Higgs in the h   Channel DPF 2002, Williamsburg Alex Melnitchouk (Brown University)
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 Quark Compositeness With Di-Photon Final State at LHC :Update Prof. Debajyoti Choudhury, Dr. Satyaki Bhattacharya & Prof. Brajesh C. Choudhary Department.
1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Update on searches for ZZ signal in the 3 electron channel Azeddine Kasmi Bob Kehoe Many Thanks to: David, Pavel, Julia LO NLO.
Overview of Extra Dimension studies at LHC Vladimir Litvin, Caltech, CMS.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Converted photon and π 0 discrimination based on H    analysis.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter April 2011.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
 discrimination with converted photons
CMS-IHEP/Beijing weekly meeting
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
Modified HEEP ID for Z’ SUSY Search
A reconstruction algorithm for photons converted in tracker
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Study of Gamma+Jets production
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
PHENIX measurement on direct photon production
Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS
 discrimination with converted photons
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
 discrimination with converted photons
S.N. Gninenko, M.M. Kirsanov, N.V. Krasnikov, V.A. Matveev
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Ivan Hollins 08/05/06 The University of Birmingham
Presentation transcript:

Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech QCD Meeting 11 December 2007

Introduction Feasiblity study for RS-1 G* Relevance to QCD group: QCD backgrounds are amongst our largest MC Samples: Produced privately at Caltech & Fermilab (no pileup) CMSSW_1_6_7 Signal RS-1 G: MG=750, 1250, 1000, & 1500 GeV (with c = 0.1 & 0.01) Main Backgrounds: Irreducible qqbar & gg (Born & Box) Gamma+jets (Brem), in which one photon comes from the hard interaction, and the second comes from FSR from an outgoing quark OR the decay of a neutral hadron QCD jets: where we get photons from the decay of neutral hadrons

MC Samples Signal Samples Background Samples Box and Born produced with CKIN(3)=200 (low limit of the invariant mass of the two outgoing photons, with high end is set to infinity). Filters were used when producing Brem and QCD samples, with selection rates 1:80 and 1:1200, respectively.

HLT EG Efficiency e- related HLT paths HLT1EMHighEt: 1 SC with pt>80 GeV and loose isolation: ECAL isol: < 5 GeV in R<0.3 + H/E: <5% , HCAL isol + <8 GeV in 0.15<R<0.3 + tracker iso: <4 tracks in R<0.3 HLT1EMVeryHighEt: 1 Super-Cluster (SC) with pt>200 GeV

Selection:  Invariant Mass Signal Samples 750 =15 1000 =19 1250 =22 1500 =28 Background Samples Born Box Brem QCD Only requirement here: photon SC pt > 100 GeV… “final” cut is a 3window around MG

Selection: photon pt 750 1000 1250 1500 Each photon candidate is identified as a SC in ECAL. We require: SC pt > 100 GeV Born Box Brem QCD 750 1000 1250 1500 Higher pt photon Lower pt photon Born Box Brem QCD Red = All candidates Blue = MC Truth required

Selection: ECAL Isolation 750 1000 1250 1500 ECAL Iso =  ET within cone of R < 0.5 ECAL Iso < 2% Plotted here are the Log of Ecal Iso Born Box Brem QCD 750 1000 1250 1500 Higher pt photon Lower pt photon Born Box Brem QCD Red = All candidates Blue = MC Truth required

Selection: H/E 750 1000 1250 1500 H/E =  E of HCAL RecHits within cone of R < 0.3 / ET of SC H/E < 5% Plotted here are the Log of H/E Born Box Brem QCD 750 1000 1250 1500 Higher pt photon Lower pt photon Born Box Brem QCD Red = All candidates Blue = MC Truth required

Selection: Tracker Isolation, nTracks 750 1000 1250 1500 Tracker Isolation = number of tracks within cone of R < 0.3 nTracks <= 3 Plotted here are the Log of nTracks Born Box Brem QCD 750 1000 1250 1500 Higher pt photon Lower pt photon Born Box Brem QCD Red = All candidates Blue = MC Truth required

Selection: Tracker Isolation, pt Tracks 750 1000 1250 1500 Tracker Isolation = pT of tracks within cone of R < 0.3 / pT of SC pT of tracks / SC pT< 1% Plotted here is the Log of this variable. Born Box Brem QCD 750 1000 1250 1500 Higher pt photon Lower pt photon Born Box Brem QCD Red = All candidates Blue = MC Truth required

“Final” Selection Rates Selection rates after applying cascade of afore-mentioned cuts (%) With HLT1EMHighEt requirement Signal efficiencies ~40-50%, low (all <0.2%) background effiiency

“Final” Selection Rates Selection rates after applying cascade of afore-mentioned cuts (%) With HLT1EMVeryHighEt requirement Signal efficiencies ~40-50%, low (all <0.2%) background effiiency

Mass Distributions After Selection 750 1000 1250 1500 Born Box Brem QCD Numbers of events scaled to 1 fb-1

Next Steps Analysis: Production: Finalizing analysis and working on note based on MC studies Systematic Errors Comparison with ORCA results Currently, this is a simple MC analysis but we will eventually develop a more robust strategy for dealing with real data Production: 167: have produced signal with c=0.01, will include next 171: produced a couple samples before realizing huge memory usage in this release.. Noticed some large differences in efficiencies and selection variable distributions.. 172: just produced a few samples, currently checking Working on gamma+jets and 2gamma+jets Alpgen or CompHEP samples to better emulate backgrounds

Backup Slides

Comparison of HLT EG in 167 vs 171 E-gamma HLT path efficiencies Born Box 167 171 167 171 Appears that EG efficiencies in HLT have changed significantly from 167 to 171

167 vs 171 Selection: photon pt Born bkg Box bkg Higher Et photon Red = 167 Blue = 171 Lower Et photon

167 vs 171 Selection: ECAL Iso Born bkg Box bkg Higher Et photon Strange peaks Higher Et photon Red = 167 Blue = 171 Lower Et photon

167 vs 171 Selection: H/E Born bkg Box bkg Higher Et photon Red = 167 Blue = 171 Lower Et photon More narrow H/E distributions

167 vs 171 Selection: Tracker Isolation (pt_tracks) Born bkg Box bkg Significant change in tracker isolation distributions Higher Et photon Red = 167 Blue = 171 Lower Et photon

167 vs 171 Selection: Tracker Isolation (N_tracks) Born bkg Box bkg Decrease in tracking efficiency? Higher Et photon Red = 167 Blue = 171 Lower Et photon