Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
MSCHE Annual Conference December st Century Higher Education Projections Increasingly diverse student populations Widely varying levels of secondary.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Transfer Success: Skills to Succeed in a Baccalaureate Program Charlene A. Stinard, Director Transfer and Transition Services University of Central Florida.
A Roadmap for Professional Development Planning
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
EMS Training Institution Accreditation Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Robert M. Worley II Director, Education Service VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Department of Veterans Affairs 2013 CCME Annual Symposium February 26,
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Glendale Community College
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
ISER Committee Presentations
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Roles and Responsibilities
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Fort Valley State University
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Quality Matters Overview
Co-Curricular Assessment
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful

What are the top New Year’s Resolutions? First is exercise and second is lose weight This is a goal

Questions for Discussion Why do physical exercise? What process did you use to enter into an exercise program and what was your timeline? How many times a week and for how long did you plan to exercise? How did you know that you were making progress? What impact did the exercise program have? Did you achieve what you had planned? What will you do different next time? What went well and what did not go well during the process? Why is your Objective or Outcome What you will do is your Action How much is your Target How do you know about your progress is your Assessment Methodology Did you achieve it and the process is the Analysis of Findings What will you do different is Use of Findings (even if you achieved it)

Planning and Assessment and Student Learning Outcomes

How does the exercise relate to planning and assessment and student learning outcomes? New Year’s Resolution Exercise Planning and Reporting Process Why do physical exercise? What process did you use and what was your timeline? How many times a week and for how long did you plan to exercise? How did you know that you were making progress? What was the impact and did you achieve the plan? What will you do different next time? What is your Objective or Outcome? What you will do/what is your Action Plan? What is your Target and Timeframe? How do you know if you progressed/what is your Assessment Methodology? Did you achieve it/what is your Analysis of Findings? What will you do different/what is your Use of Findings (even if you achieved it)? The goal was to demonstrate how the exercise aligns with the planning and reporting process for student learning outcomes and strategic planning and annual reporting

Primary Importance of Assessment Assessment begins with issues and illuminates questions about which programs care. Assessment outcomes are meaningful. Assessment results are valued and genuinely used to improve. Assessment is a cooperative effort. What do you want to know about what students learned in the program. What are you experiencing in the classroom that impacts students’ success in the program.

Faculty’s Role in Assessment ”…issues such as curricular design and effectiveness, assessment of students’ academic performance, student retention and graduation rates, quality of academic advising, and appropriateness of co- curricular activities are central to the self-study. Because of their training and direct contact with students, faculty members are in the best position to provide analyses of these issues. And they possess the research and analytical skills not only to identify deficiencies in processes and outcomes but also to develop methods for improvement.” American Association of University Professors: Institutional Accreditation A Call for Greater Faculty Involvement (2008)

Office of Assessment and Accreditation’s Role Ask questions to understand (not evaluative) Exchange ideas (create a dialogue) Provide consultations and feedback Provide professional development opportunities Be a partner in outcomes research

Which of the following is NOT an advantage or benefit of accreditation? Protects the public from fraud and unscrupulous practices Ensures that schools demonstrate sound educational practices Supports students’ abilities to earn and transfer academic credits Allows schools to demonstrate good standing with federal agencies, especially financial aid Verifies that an institution is perfect

Why participate in accreditation? Provides quality assurance to the public. Protects the public from fraudulent practices. Allows students to transfer credits. Allows higher education institutions to be in good standing with the Federal Department of Education – (and thus dispense federal financial aid). Christine Institution meets a quality standard level Degrees are legitimately obtained and not just in exchange for money Credits are portable to other institutions Inability to offer federal financial aid could impact enrollment as only 1/3 of our students who are enrolled do not receive

Accreditation Overview The Review Process : Standards: The accrediting establishes standards. Self-study report and evaluation: The institution or program prepares an in-depth self-evaluation study that measures its performance against the standards. It is reviewed by a team of peers. On-site evaluation: A group of peers is selected by the accrediting agency visits the institution or program to determine compliance. Accreditation approval: The accrediting agency grants accreditation compliance status. Accreditation monitoring: The accrediting agency monitors institutions or programs or programs found to be in non-compliance with the standards. Re-evaluation: The accrediting agency periodically re-evaluates each institution or program to ascertain whether continuation of its compliance status is warranted.

Major Compliance Categories Governance & Administration Institutional Effectiveness Educational Programs & Curriculum Faculty Library & Learning Resources Student Affairs Financial & Physical Resources

Educational Resources Office of Assessment and Accreditation website Personnel Detailed information about processes, templates, and tools Published books, articles, etc. Assessment Academy (prior workshop information and upcoming workshops) right click to open link

Assessment & Accreditation Pillars The foundation of the Office of Assessment Accreditation is built on four pillars: student learning outcomes, accreditation, planning, and faculty and staff engagement Planning Division Strategic and Annual Planning and Effectiveness Academic and Academic Support Strategic and Annual Planning and Effectiveness Accreditation Regional (SACSCOC) standards integrated in institutional practices Relational Accountability and Assessment Management Software Student Learning Outcomes Faculty-driven, systematic, and collaborative assessment in all modes of delivery Integration and alignment throughout all curricula Faculty & Staff Engagement Professional Development Opportunities Planning and Assessment Support

Questions?