Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: /16.6.3 Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure Legend: From: Human grasp point selection
Advertisements

From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(11):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures Journal of Vision. 2016;16(14):5.
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(10):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Figure Legend: From: The modern Japanese color lexicon
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;54(13): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The natural statistics of blur
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
From: Visual speed sensitivity in the drum corps color guard
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
From: Abnormality in face scanning by children with autism spectrum disorder is limited to the eye region: Evidence from multi-method analyses of eye tracking.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: A short-term memory of multi-stable perception
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(2):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(2):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(5):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):2.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech ;6(4):5. doi: /tvst Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(9):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Presentation transcript:

From: A novel measure to determine viewing priority and its neural correlates in the human brain Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi:10.1167/16.6.3 Figure Legend: Simple example. The graph on the upper left shows simulated data: two fixations of interest (bright and dark red dots), reference fixations (blue dots), and random fixations (green dots). The graph on the upper middle shows the sorted distribution of belongingness μx for the two fixations of interest based on the differences in location to all reference fixations (x-axis denotes fixation index of the reference set, y-axis denotes μx). The graph on the upper right shows the cumulative histograms of belongingness μx for the two fixations of interest (red colors) and all random fixation locations (green). Priority values are 1 and 0.6 for the bright red and dark red fixations, respectively. Note that in this simple case, fuzzy parameter m has already been fixed (value: 3.486; see Figure 2 for more details). The lower graphs denote the case where a bias is present in the random set (green). This has no effect on the distribution of μx for the fixations of interest (lower middle graph). For this example, priority values are 1 and 0 for the bright red and dark red fixations, respectively. Date of download: 1/13/2018 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved.