Business Areas Prioritization Presentation

These slides focus on providing the information for eGov to Recommend Future Blueprints. Review Blueprints Being Developed (currently 6) Prioritize Business Areas to Blueprint Create Modernization Blueprint (6-9 months) MNS & Business Case Process (7 months) Ensure Implementation of Approved Blueprints (currently 3) Implement Blueprint Budget Process (17 months)

Which Blueprints should be done next? IEA is supporting the eGov Team by having analyzed the DOI business areas and recommending future Blueprints. Fiscal Year Blueprints Completed in Year FY 2004 4 FY 2006 1 FY 2007 4+ FY 2008 ? … Which Blueprints should be done next? Progress of Architecture Planning (based on major investments)

IBAT developed this business area model so that each of these areas can be considered for a future Blueprint study.

The IBAT worked to brainstorm a list of potential criteria for prioritizing business areas for future studies. Is there an executive sponsor that is willing to support and implement a Modernization Blueprint and is there a communications plan for the study? If a Service Area, how many Core Business Areas are supported? To what degree is the Business Area associated with the political hot buttons of the current administration? To what degree do DEAR reports show potential overlaps in services or systems? What percentage of the IT investment portfolio is associated with the Business Area? What percentage of the DOI budget is associated with the Business Area? To what degree is the Business Area facing increased pressure to improve based on PART, GAO, IG, and OMB? To what degree do the employees of the Business Area have difficulty accessing the critical information they need to perform the mission? What are the percentages of completion of associated strategic measures in ABC/M performance module for the business area?

Of the original list of IBAT proposed criteria, five criteria were selected by IEA based on the availability of data within DOI. Criteria for Determining Performance Results: Performance on PAR Performance on PART Criteria for Determining Financial Spending: % of DOI Labor Costs % of DOI IT Portfolio Does the Business Area Have an Executive Sponsor for a Blueprint Initiative?

IEA has pulled data from PAR, PART, eCPIC, ABC/M, and DEAR to evaluate all of the DOI Business Areas “Financial Spending” is a weighted score based on the % of Total DOI Labor Costs and % of Total DOI IT Portfolio “Performance Results” is a weighted score based on the Business Area’s performance with PART and PAR

IEA has produced a summary visual for each of the 4 categories of DOI Business Areas

The summary visuals have 4 quadrants and each business area is plotted based on its performance and spending. Business Areas with Lower Performance and Higher Spending Should be the Primary Focus of Future Blueprints

This visual summarizes the prioritization analysis for DOI’s Core Business Areas

This visual summarizes the prioritization analysis for DOI’s Support Business Areas

This visual summarizes the prioritization analysis for DOI’s Management Business Areas Some Business Areas are at 0 for performance since PAR and PART are not applicable.

This visual summarizes the prioritization analysis for DOI’s Service Business Areas Some Business Areas are at 0 for performance since PAR and PART are not applicable.

Secondary Candidates from Core Business Areas In summary, there are 4 primary candidates and 6 secondary candidates for future blueprints. Primary Candidates (lower performance, higher spending) Biological Communities Community and Social Services (education) Facilities and Real Property Information Technology Secondary Candidates from Core Business Areas (lower performance, lower spending) Landscapes and Watersheds Energy Cultural and Heritage Insular Economics Forage Tribal Consultation and Services