Halifax Regional Trails Association, March 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
400 North Orange Avenue Orlando, FL
Advertisements

Oregon EPHT Dan Rubado, Epidemiologist Environmental Public Health Tracking Program Office of Environmental Public Health Oregon Health Authority.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Neighborhood Walkability and Bikeability Andrew Rundle, Dr.P.H. Associate Professor of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University.
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Urban Settlement Patterns
Southern Nevada Strong Consortium Committee Meeting April 18, 2013.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
© Trivector Citizens’ Accessibility with Sustainable Transport Modes as basis when Defining the Right Mix of Measures Hanna Wennberg, Trivector Traffic.
Transport Demand and Management Implementation Lessons Learnt from European Experience Rudolf M. Petersen Energy Efficiency Policies in the Land Transport.
Retail Location. The Retail Property Developer’s Simple Truths!
Introduction to TIDE Cluster 2: Non-motorised Transport TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Bernard Gyergyay Rupprecht Consult.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Fundamentals on transport and energy FUNDAMENTALS ON TRANSPORT & ENERGY.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Healthy Places: The Community of Tomorrow. USA Population 2000 –275 million people –Median age: 35.8 yrs 2030 –351 million people –Median age: 39 yrs.
TDM and Health Melinda Norris Project Manager - Walkabout October
Dr Darren Walton Research Manager Behavioural Sciences Opus Central Labs Impediments to Walking as a Mode Choice Foundation for.
Methodological Problems Speed of movement and barriers 300m ≠ 15 min walk Quality of public space or services.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Introduction to Sugar Access
The reasons to use flexible car sharing are varied.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
Minimum Parking Requirements and Porirua City. ‘How to ruin social conversations, sprawl cities and induce driving’.
Improving the Health Care-Transportation Connection Presented to PPTA April 9, 2015 York Adams Transportation Authority.
Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Welcome Open House Public Information Session Reconstruction Project Brunswick Avenue (Guelph Street to Blucher Street) Guelph Street (Ellis Avenue to.
Towards a better understanding of dynamics in travel behaviour First results of the new Netherlands Mobility Panel (MPN) European Transport Conference.
Urban Land Uses 6 Land Classifications. 1.0 Residential Land Uses includes all the places where people live often takes up to 40% or more of the developed.
Walkable Commercial Districts The US Experience
Rush Line Corridor: Connecting Manufactured Home Parks to Opportunity
Car, walk or public transport?
FUNDAMENTALS ON TRANSPORT & ENERGY
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Title of Presentation Bike Sharing System CE 635 Huang Liu.
Urban Land Use.
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
Walking to transit (and potential of walking)
URBAN LAND USES 6 Land Classifications.
Urban Land Use.
Urban Land Use.
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE IMPACTS ON ACCESSIBILITY FOR SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN BLOEMFONTEIN NDAKHONA BASHINGI Southern African.
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
Travel patterns in a city
Improved treatment of special attractors
CHANGES IN OUR TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR 2018 Household Travel Survey Results
Transportation Demand Analysis
Transportation Research Institute (IMOB)-Universtiet Hasselt
Travel patterns in a city
Chapter 9 Section 2 Speed and Velocity.
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
Spatial Network Analysis of Public Transport Accessibility
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Time Distance Graphs Time (mins) Distance (km) E D B C
WWPNA General Member Meeting October 16, 2018
Passenger Mobility Task Force 21 May 2015
The relation between Human behavior and the built environment.
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
PhD Candidate: Lida Aminian Supervisor: Harry Timmermans
Time and Distance Graphs
Time Distance Graphs Time (mins) Distance (km) E D B C
WJEC Eduqas GCSE (9-1) Geography
Presentation transcript:

Halifax Regional Trails Association, March 2013 Walking for Transport in the Halifax Region: Destinations, Distances, and Policy Implications   Hugh Millward Department of Geography, Saint Mary’s University

Purpose & Approach Walking is an important component of healthy exercise Active-transport (AT) walking is an important component of walking AT walking should also be encouraged for environmental & urban-design reasons This research: investigates AT walking behaviour emphasizes trip (not participant) characteristics identifies the major types of attractors (destinations) gauges their attractive power (percent of trips) assesses the extent of their walking catchment areas H. Millward HRTA March 2013

The Halifax STAR project STAR (Space-Time Activity Research) Combined time use & travel survey, 2007-8 Funded by ACOA PI Andrew Harvey, Co-PI Hugh Millward Respondents sampled randomly throughout HRM Time diary & GPS tracking for ~2,000 primary respondents (age 15+), for 48 hours H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Walking for Transport vs. Recreation (all trips, incl. round-trip) Statistic Walking for Transport Walking for Recreation Participation Rate (% respondents/day) 31.7 21.8 Average Time Walking (mins/day/participant) 23.3 50.6 Average Walks per Participant 3.1 1.4 Average Walk Duration (mins) 7.7 39.1 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

AT Walking Trips versus Trips by Other Travel Modes (single-episode trips only) Trip Type Statistic Count Duration (mins) Distance (km) Speed (km/h) AT walks Mean 1,790 9.0 0.67 4.8 Median 6.0 0.48 4.5 25th percentile 3.0 0.23 3.4 75th percentile 12.0 0.86 5.9 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

AT Walking Trips versus Trips by Other Travel Modes (single-episode trips only) Trip Type Statistic Count Duration (mins) Distance (km) Speed (km/h) AT walks Mean 1,790 9.0 0.67 4.8 Median 6.0 0.48 4.5 25th percentile 3.0 0.23 3.4 75th percentile 12.0 0.86 5.9 Bicycle 147 18.3 3.47 11.2 10.0 2.04 11.1 Car 20,680 13.7 7.97 33.3 3.86 25.3 Bus 158 26.9 6.26 16.2 20.0 4.96 15.0 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Origin and Destination Categories Percentage of 1,790 AT Walking Trips Origins Destinations Home Work place Other's Home School Outdoors Other Place Total 0.0 3.5 4.2 0.1 6.1 10.9 25.0 Workplace 2.8 0.4 2.7 13.3 19.3 4.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 6.0 0.6 1.3 2.1 1.5 1.6 5.6 11.1 11.5 0.8 0.7 2.5 16.3 42.8 20.5 17.0 5.7 1.2 12.0 43.6 100.0 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Mean AT Walking-trip Durations (Minutes) by Origin and Destination Categories Origins Destinations Home Work place Other's Home School Outdoors Other Place Total -- 14.6 7.4 15.0 13.5 11.1 Workplace 14.8 8.5 6.6 7.8 8.7 6.3 27.3 8.4 18.0 5.8 9.7 7.6 19.8 21.0 3.8 10.3 7.3 6.9 5.5 5.0 3.3 6.7 12.9 6.4 8.3 11.2 7.7 7.0 8.9 9.0 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Mean AT Walking-trip Distances (km) by Origin and Destination Categories Origins Destinations Home Work place Other's Home School Outdoors Other Place Total -- 1.19 0.59 1.15 0.54 0.95 0.82 Workplace 0.61 0.48 0.66 0.47 2.61 0.79 1.26 0.65 0.58 1.65 1.27 0.42 0.51 0.64 0.78 0.44 0.36 0.39 0.28 0.50 0.96 0.63 0.49 0.62 0.85 0.60 0.67 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

AT Walking Trips, by Specific Destinations (destinations with at least 1% of trips, single-episode trips only) SIC-Based Destinations % of AT Walking Trips (n=1,790) AT Walking Trips as % of All Trips Mean Walk Duration (mins) Mean Distance (km) TOTAL 100.0 8.3 9.0 0.67 Respondent’s home 20.8 6.0 11.1 0.84 Workplace 17.0 17.2 0.66 Bus Stop or Ferry Terminal 9.1 44.3 7.0 0.51 Restaurant or Bar 7.8 10.7 7.7 0.52 Someone else’s home 5.7 4.8 0.60 Grocery store 5.2 6.7 8.4 0.63 Other Retail 3.7 7.4 8.1 0.59 Shopping Centre or Mall 3.3 12.4 10.6 0.75 Outdoors away from home 2.7 20.2 7.5 0.56 Bank 0.78 School 2.4 10.4 0.76 Other Services 2.3 6.3 8.6 College or University 1.6 19.6 7.9 Fast food 1.5 7.1 0.45 Drug Store 9.9 Government Services 1.3 9.2 10.0 Park or Beach 1.1 11.2 12.0 0.80 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Distance-Decline Gradients 1 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Distance-Decline Gradients 2 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

X = Time Duration (mins) Log/Linear Regressions (Negative Exponentials): Log Percent of AT Walking Trips to Destination (Y) against Distance / Duration (X) Major Destinations X = Distance (km) X = Time Duration (mins) r* a (peak) b (slope) r** a b All Destinations .99 1.456 -.643 .94 1.282 -.048 Respondent’s home .95 1.359 -.519 .91 1.193 -.037 All Workplaces .92 1.328 -.543 .88 1.111 -.039 School .85 1.248 -.401 .57 1.014 -.020 Bus Stop or Ferry Terminal 1.351 -.569 1.277 -.052 Restaurant or Bar .93 1.427 -.652 .81 1.035 -.032 Grocery store .96 1.458 -.614 .80 1.078 -.028 Bank 1.343 -.355 .39 0.987 -.010 * all significant at a = .01 **all significant at a = .01, except School at .04 and Bank at .21 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Major Employment Nodes H. Millward HRTA March 2013

AT Walking to Destinations in Major Employment Nodes (single-episode trips only, to non-home destinations) Major Employment Node % of Non-home AT Walking Trips (n=1,423) AT Walking as % of All Non-home Trips to Node Mean Walk Duration (mins) Mean Distance (km) Downtown Halifax 41.5 38.0 8.0 0.59 Downtown Dartmouth 6.4 14.0 8.8 0.62 Halifax Isthmus Shopping Centres 2.5 8.9 10.7 0.83 Bedford Sunnyside 2.3 7.2 9.1 0.58 University Avenue (Hospitals & Dalhousie U) 2.0 26.2 7.1 Stadacona Base and Dockyard (military) 1.5 16.8 0.67 Burnside Business Park 1.4 3.4 9.4 0.87 Bayers Lake Business Park 1.3 3.2 3.1 0.31 Woodside BP and Imperial Oil Refinery 0.8 7.0 10.8 0.98 Other Employment Nodes 0.7 2.2 5.7 0.42 H. Millward HRTA March 2013

Key Findings & Policy Implications Most AT walks have origins other than home or work. Ditto for destinations Avoid excessive focus on walkways/trails in residential neighborhoods Shopping travel is the most common travel purpose More attention to walkways/trails within and to retail areas Only 3% of trips to Burnside and Bayers Lake are AT walking trips More trails within and to business parks. Locate high-density housing adjacent to these trails most walks are less than 600m and very few exceed 1200m Inside development boundary, locate transit stops & local amenities (playground, first schools) within 1000m of all homes New housing should be within 1000m of local retail/employment centres, and local centres should have high-capacity transit to district centres

Key Findings & Policy Implications Most AT walks have origins other than home or work. Ditto for destinations Avoid excessive focus on walkways/trails in residential neighborhoods Shopping travel is the most common travel purpose More attention to walkways/trails within and to retail areas Only 3% of trips to Burnside and Bayers Lake are AT walking trips More trails within and to business parks. Locate high-density housing adjacent to these trails most walks are less than 600m and very few exceed 1200m Inside development boundary, locate transit stops & local amenities (e.g. playground, first schools) within 1000m of all homes New housing should be within 1000m of local retail/employment centres, and local centres should have high-capacity transit to district centres

Questions, Comments? Contact: Hugh Millward Department of Geography Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 3C3 hugh.millward@smu.ca H. Millward HRTA March 2013