Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa SPSC meeting - Villars - 27 sep 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 1/36 Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University
Advertisements

Kirk McDonald Monday, 28th May Report of the International Working Group on Muon Beamlines Bruno Autin, Roberto Cappi, Rob Edgecock, Kirk McDonald,
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
LFV and LUV at CLEO Lepton-Flavor Violation: –Probe non-SM physics and/or SM extensions –Here, report on Upsilon(1S)   Complements other studies MEG.
B. Lee Roberts, Oxford University, 19 October p. 1/55 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics Everything you always wanted to know about the.
WG4:  physics B. Lee Roberts, on behalf of the Intense Muon Physics Working Group - p. 1/48 WG4 Summary and Future Plans The muon trio and more B. Lee.
B. Lee Roberts, PANIC05, Santa Fe, 27 October, p. 1/35 Muon (g-2) Status and Plans for the Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.
B. Lee Roberts, HIFW04, Isola d’Elba, 6 June p. 1/39 Future Muon Dipole Moment Measurements at a high intensity muon source B. Lee Roberts Department.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Ivan Logashenko for Mu2e Collaboration
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
PRISM and Neutrino Factory in Japan Y. Kuno KEK, IPNS January 19th, 2000 at CERN.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
1 fact03 NY June 6 th 2003 Particle physics with intense muon beams A.M. Baldini - INFN Pisa.
 N-eN Rare Process M. Aoki, Osaka University MuSAC-2009, Tokai, 2010/3/10-11.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
May William Molzon, UC Irvine Muon Physics at Fermilab 1 Muon Physics at Fermilab Will the physics be important in a global context when the experiment.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) February 4, 2005 at KEK
G-2, EDM, COMET muon particle physics programmes at J-PARC Mu_01 Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK FKPPL-FJPPL workshop, Yonesei Univ.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory Fundamental Interactions Trento/Italy, June 2004 Theoretical and Experimental Considerations.
Mu2e and Project X, September 3, 2008 E Prebys Background: Proton Economics in Project X Era* Assume  9mA*1ms = 5.3x10 13 protons/linac “blast”  Main.
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
Brian Plimley Physics 129 November Outline  What is the anomalous magnetic moment?  Why does it matter?  Measurements of a µ  : CERN.
Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2)  University of Pennsylvania.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment --a harbinger of new physics Chang Liu Physics 564.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
The Muon g-2 Experiment – Investigating how the spin of a muon is affected as it moves through a magnetic field Astrid Rodrigues.
Parametrisation of PRISM Ring and Design Options J. Pasternak Imperial College London/RAL STFC PRISM-FFAG Task Force phone meeting,
EDMs in the SUSY GUTs Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) NuFact04 6th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Superbeams, Osaka University, Japan.
The physics of Mu2e Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology Mu2e computing review doc-db XXXXX.
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory HEP Seminar SLAC, 27 April 2004 Muon g-2: Powerful Probe of Physics Beyond the SM. Present Status.
Muon Rare Decay at PRISM Masaharu Aoki Osaka University KEKNP01 December 10-12, 2001, KEK.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory New opportunities at CERN CERN, 12 May 2009 Storage Ring EDM Experiments The storage ring method can.
– + + – Search for the μEDM using a compact storage ring A. Adelmann 1, K. Kirch 1, C.J.G. Onderwater 2, T. Schietinger 1, A. Streun 1 1 Paul Scherrer.
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa CERN - 29 apr 2004
ICNPF 2013, Crete, Aug. 28 – Sept. 5, 2013 JEDI - The Jülich Electric Dipole Moment Investigations in Storage Rings | H. Ströher.
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
Cecilia Voena INFN Roma on behalf of the MEG collaboration
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Precision Muon Experiments
Prospects for CLFV experiments
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Future physics at nuSTORM
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
A personal overview of particle physics activities at PSI
-LFV and related topics
Lepton Flavor Violation
(particle) physics with a new high intensity low energy muon source
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
The silicon detector of the muon g-2 experiment at J-PARC
Muon Physics Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 18, 2005
Searching for New Physics in muon lepton flavor violating processes
electric dipole moments (EDM)
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Neutrino Physics with SHiP
Decay Angular Measurement in the MEG Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa SPSC meeting - Villars - 27 sep 2004 Lepton Flavor Violation and Dipole Moments in the Muon System at High Intensity Beams Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa SPSC meeting - Villars - 27 sep 2004

Precision Physics as complementary to Frontier Energy Physics Precision Measurement relevant if: firm predictions (eventually null) from Standard Model relevant informations on Standard Model or on Standard Model extensions can be extracted experimentally accessible (relatively) low cost Muons satisfy all requirements! M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Physics motivations: LFV Lepton flavor violation processes (LFV), like meg , meee , me conversion , are negligibly small in the extended Standard Model (SM) with massive Dirac neutrinos (BR  10-50) Super-Symmetric extensions of the SM (SUSY-GUTs) with right handed neutrinos and see-saw mechanism may produce LFV processes at significant rates m-LFV decays are therefore a clean (no SM contaminated) indication of New Physics and they are accessible experimentally M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Physics motivations : m moments Magnetic Dipole Moment (g-2) : measured and predicted with very high accuracy (10 ppb in electron; 0.5 ppm in muon), it represents the most precise test of QED ; most extensions of SM predict a contribution to g-2 ; a 2.7 s discrepancy between theory and experiment has raised a lot of interest (and publications) . Electric Dipole Moment (mEDM) : Like LFV processes, a positive measurement of m Electric Dipole Moment (mEDM) would be a signal of physics beyond the SM Both experiments need a new high intensity muon source for the next generation of measurements M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Connection between LFV and m-moments In SUSY, g-2 and EDM probe the diagonal elements of the slepton mixing matrix, while the LFV decay me probes the off-diagonal terms In case SUSY particles are observed at LHC, measurements of the LFV decays and of the m-moments will provide one of the cleanest measarements of tanb and of the new CP violating phase . M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

The Anomalous Magnetic Moment : am QED QED Prediction: Computed up to 4th order [Kinoshita et al.] (5th order estimated [Mohr, Taylor]) Schwinger 1948 (Nobel price 1965)    Kinoshita-Nio, hep-ph/0402206 corrected feb 04 QED Hadronic Weak SUSY... ... or other new physics ? shad LBL M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Storage ring to measure am polarized Precession of spin and momentum vectors in E, B fields (in the hyp. bB=0) : Electric field used for focusing (electrostatic quadrupoles) B (out of plane) E At g magic = 29.3, corresponding to Em=3.09 GeV, K=0 and precession is directely proportional to am M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Muon anomaly (from Hoecker’s presentation at ICHEP04 - Beijing) Including CMD2 and KLOE e+e- results Melnikov-Vainshtein, hep-ph/0312226 a SM [e+e– ] = (11 659 182.8 ± 6.3had ± 3.5LBL ± 0.3QED+EW)  10 –10 BNL E821 (2004) : aexp = (11 659 208.0  5.8) 10 10 a exp – a SM = (25.2 ± 9.2)  10 –10  2.7 ”standard deviations“ (using e+e- data only) Observed Difference with Experiment: not yet published not yet published preliminary m+ and m- data combined together (CPT) M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Possible new physics contribution… New physics contribution can affect am through the muon coupling to new particles In particular SUSY can easily predict values which contribute to am at the 1ppm level t data can be affected differently than e+e- data by this new physics In particular H- exchange is at the same scale as W- exchange, while m(H0)>>m(r) Marciano + others     W- H- M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

LoI to J-PARC An experiment with sensitivity of 0.05 ppm proposed at J-PARC At the moment, the project is scheduled for Phase2 (>2011) Together with the experiment there must be an improvement on: evaluation of LBL experimetal data on s(had) to cover m(p)<s<m(r) and 1<s<2 GeV M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

New proposal - statistics The new experiment aims to a precision of 0.1-0.05 ppm, which needs a factor of 25-100 more muons This can be achieved by increasing the … … number of primary protons on target  target must be redisigned … number of bunches … muon injection efficiency which, at E821, was 7% … running time (it was 7months with m- at BNL) The J-PARC proposal is mostly working on items 2 (go from 12  90 bunches) and 3 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Intermediate step on g-2 … As intermediate step between now ( 0.6 ppm) and a future storage ring ( 0.05) a proposal of upgrading E821, in order to reach  0.2 ppm, has been submitted to BNL in July 2004 and defended Sep 9  positive response from PAC M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) The electromagnetic interaction Hamiltonian of a particle with both magnetic and electric dipole moment is: g-2 term The existence of dE, in SM, is suppressed because dE violates both P and T (and also CP in the CPT hyp.) only one weak phase exist in CKM This is not the case for SUSY where many CP phases exist M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Limits on EDM Up to now EDMs have been measured only on: Neutrons Heavy paramagnetic/diamagnetic atoms/molecules (Tl,Hg,YbF) Electron EDM extracted from (2.) : dE(e)<210-27 ecm New idea to measure directly the EDM on an elementary particle : muons in storage ring What value for mEDM if new physics exists in am at 1ppm? This New Physics would induce a mEDM : dmNP  amNP tanfCP 10-13 e  cm  tanfCP 10-22 e  cm With new technique expected sensitivity is dm  10-24 e  cm unit conversion M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

NO out of plane precession New approach to mEDM Muons in storage ring: combination of g, E, B that cancels out muon spin (g-2) precession (electric field E must be radial and Eb=Bb=0) ; only mEDM precession left . - precession due to am - precession due to mEDM NO out of plane precession side view M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Muon ring for mEDM measurement LOI to J-PARC with following parameters: P = 500 MeV/c Bz = 0.25 T Er = 2MV/m R = 7m <R> = 11m B+E = 2.6 m Intervals = 1.7 m n. elements = 16 circunference  40m Required statistics: NmP2 = 1016 P = Beam Polarization Optimal momentum choice : pm  300-500 MeV Below 300 MeV the muon polarization becomes a concern Above 500 MeV the radial electric field needed to cancel out g-2 precession is >20kV/cm M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Systematics Basic idea to fight systematics: compare clockwise vs counter-clockwise results Needs 2 injection points and possibility of changing polarity of dipole magnets (not necessary for quadrupoles) 0 due to choice of b,B,E cw  ccw b  -b B  -B E  E Opposite sign Same sign M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Summary on m-moments Both g-2 and mEDM are sensitive to new physics beyond the SM (maybe behind the corner) Unique opportunity of studying phases of mixing matrix for SUSY particles mEDM first direct probe of dE on elementary particle The experiments are hard but, in particular the mEDM, not impossible A large flux of polarized muons of energy 3 GeV (g-2) or 500 MeV (mEDM) is required M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Lepton Flavor Violation m decays Three relevant processes : e 3e NeN Model Indipendent Interactions: Relative strength depends upon arbitrary parameters L, LF In the hyp. L/LF<<1, as in large class of SUSY-GUT theories: BR(m-e conv)  10-3 BR(meg) BR(m3e)  10-2 BR(meg) e.g. : slepton mixing matrix Dipole Transition Direct violation M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

+e+ background signal   e g accidental   e n n ee  g g qeg = 180° Ee = Eg = 52.8 MeV Te = Tg signal   e g background correlated   e g n n n accidental   e n n ee  g g eZ  eZ g e+ + g M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

New approved experiment: MEG @ PSI +e+ : present Present limit B(me ) < 1.2x10-11 by the MEGA Collab. M.L.Brooks et al. Phys.Rev.Lett. 83(1999)1521 Revised document New approved experiment: MEG @ PSI Stopped beam of >107  /sec in a 150 mm target Liquid Xenon calorimeter for  detection (scintillation) Solenoid spectrometer & drift chambers for e+ momentum Scintillation counters for e+ timing now LoI Proposal Planning R & D Assembly Data Taking 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

No immediate (next 10 years) need for +e+ : future MEG sensitivity : 10-13 with 107 +/s The PSI E5 can deliver up to 3x108 +/s The MEG sensitivity is accidental background limited With better detector resolutions a BR of 10-14 would be possible but... Challenging ! No immediate (next 10 years) need for a more intense beam M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

+e+e+e- background signal Ee = m   eee accidental   e n n e+e- e+e- e+ + e+ e- correlated   e e e n n e+ + n e- e+ e+ + n Coplanarity Vertexing Ee = m Te+ = Te+ = Te- + n e+ e- M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

+e+e+e- : SINDRUM I SINDRUM I parameters Present limit B(m3e ) < 1x10-12 U.Bellgardt et al. Nucl.Phys. B299(1985)1 No other experimental proposal SINDRUM I parameters beam intensity 6x106 m+/s m+ momentum 25 MeV/c magnetic field 0.33T acceptance 24% momentum resolution 10% FWHM vertex resolution  2 mm2 FWHM timing resolution  ns target length 220 mm target density 11 mg/cm2 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

No immediate (next 10 years) need for +e+e+e- : summary A new experiment should aim at a sensitivity of 10-15, which means to increase beam intensity by 103 Technically not impossible, but uncorrelated background scales quadratically with the beam intensity, therefore six orders of magnitude of background reduction, wrt to SINDRUM I, is required four orders of magnitude could be achieved … more? Challenging ! No immediate (next 10 years) need for a more intense beam M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- conversion background signal Ee = mm - EB  (A,Z)  e (A,Z) RPC  (A,Z)   (A,Z-1) - g (A,Z) e- - g (A,Z) MIO  (A,Z)  e n n (A,Z) Ee = mm - EB e- - n (A,Z) M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : present Present limit B(me:Au ) < 8x10-13 SINDRUM II COLLABORATION SINDRUM II parameters beam intensity 3x107 m-/s m- momentum 53 MeV/c magnetic field 0.33T acceptance 7% momentum res. 2% FWHM Main background : Radiative Pion Capture (RPC)  suppressed with an 8mm carbon absorber at the entrance of the solenoid M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : future Differently from other channels, this one is not limited by accidentals but by RPC Two techinques to improve beam purity proposed for two next generation experiments: New approved experiment at BNL: MECO (E940) BR(me) < 10-16 (2008 ??) New project LOI to J-PARC: PRISM/PRIME BR(me) < 10-18 (>2008 ??? ) M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : beam line for MECO New AGS beam structure: 21013 protons/bucket (71012 for g-2 experiment) Short pulses of 30nsec with 1.35 µsec separation between pulses (2 per rotation) Extinction between pulses must be >109; fast kicker in transport will divert beam from production solenoid Pulsed beam from AGS to eliminate prompt background M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : MECO detector Straw Tracker Muon Stopping Target Superconducting Transport Solenoid (2.5 T – 2.1 T) Crystal Calorimeter 2 x 1013 incident p/sec 1 x 1011 stopping µ/sec Superconducting Detector Solenoid (2.0 T – 1.0 T) Superconducting Production Solenoid (5.0 T – 2.5 T) ~ 5 signal events for 107 s (2800 hours) running if Rme = 10-16 ~ 0.45 expected bckg events if extinction factor = 10-9 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : PRISM beam PRISM (Phase Rotated Intense Slow Muon source): Pion capture section Decay section Phase rotation section Ejection system Machine parameters Intensity: 1011-1012 m/sec Muon momentum : 68 MeV Momentum spread :  0.5-1.0 MeV Beam repetition : 100 Hz M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

-e- : PRIME detector M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Very promising channel ! -e- : summary This channel will definitely benefit from an increase in beam intensity BUT The problem of pion contamination of the muon beam is the fundamental issue Two proposals : Beam extinction at <10-9 level (!) - BNL New kind of muon extraction technique with circular (compact) FFAG - PRISM Very promising channel ! M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

mEDM and me conversion with “same” beam? In mEDM LOI to J-PARC the possibility of accomodating mEDM and me in the same hall is prospected The FFAG system must be projected with the possibility of providing muons both of 80 and of 400 MeV me detector PRISM FFAG mEDM ring M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004

Summary table and Conclusions Muons have historically played a key role in understanding the structure of the Standard Model (V-A, QED tests, …) Muons are fundamental tools to discover and/or to understand the structure of any physics beyond the SM All future projects (J-PARC, Fermilab) foresee high intensity flux of muons to be used in a storage ring and/or LFV exp. me transitions and mEDM (also g-2) seem very promising Europe (CERN) should not loose this opportunity and aim for a leading role in the field of m decays and m moments M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Villars SPSC meeting 22-28 sep 2004