Predicting Variations in Motivations for Romantic Kissing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
Advertisements

Infidelity in Heterosexual Couples: Demographic, Interpersonal, and Personality-Related Predictors of Extradyadic Sex Kristen P. Mark, M.Sc., 1 Erick Janssen,
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Classroom Crushes: An Exploration of Student-Instructor Attraction Emily L. Travis and Traci A. Giuliano Southwestern University Student-teacher romances.
The Nature of Adolescents’ Non-romantic Sexual Relationships and Their Link With Well-being Catherine M. Grello Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
Attraction and Flirtation in Young Adults’ and Middle-Aged Adults’ Opposite-Sex Friendships Erin E. Hirsch, Cierra A. Micke, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Pleasure Reading: Associations Between Young Women’s Sexual Attitudes and their Reading of Contemporary Women's Magazines Brittany Sutter, Jackie Hallstrom,
EVENT LEVEL: Sex obtained through aggression will frequently be unprotected GLOBAL LEVEL: Men who have perpetrated sexual aggression will be more likely.
Adolescent romantic relationships and substance abuse: The benefits of thinking it will last forever J. Claire Stephenson, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen.
Tonya Filz & Regan A.R. Gurung University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Abstract As class sizes increase due to stagnating budgets, and as colleges and universities.
On Parenting: An Examination of Older Adolescents’ Perceptions of Parenting Styles and Success in College Results ANCOVA (controlling for ethnicity, religion,
By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco
College Students’ Expectations for Hook-Ups. Amanda Smitley Hanover College.
Ta ble 3: R E S U L T S (C O N T.) ORGASM FUNCTIONING AND SEXUAL SATISFACTION: THE SELECTIVE PROTECTIVE VALUE OF GOOD RELATIONSHIPS Kyle R. Stephenson,
PLEASURE, SELF-ESTEEM, AND EXPRESSION: EXPANDING THE RANGE OF SEXUAL MOTIVES ASSOCIATED WITH SEXUAL SATISFACTION Kyle R. Stephenson, B.S., Tierney K. Ahrold,
Predicting Sexual Risk Taking and Dysfunction in Women: Relevance of Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Cynthia A. Graham, Ph.D., 1,2,6 Stephanie.
Personally Important Posttraumatic Growth as a Predictor of Self-Esteem in Adolescents Leah McDiarmid, Kanako Taku Ph.D., & Aundreah Walenski Presented.
Approaches to Learning and the Acquisition of General Knowledge By Adrian Furnham, Andrew Christopher, Jeanette Garwood, and G. Neil Martin Personality.
Measuring Sexual Compulsivity Among Young Adults Kimberly R. McBride, Ph.D. 1,2 & Michael Reece, Ph.D., MPH 2,3 1 Department of Pediatrics, Section of.
Women Control Male Romantic Partners to Pursue Extra Pair Partners INTRODUCTION MATE GUARDING AND MATE RETENTION Mate guarding controls with whom the female.
Introduction Results: Mediational Analyses Results: Zero-Order Correlations Method Presented at the 15 th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality.
Personality and Health: No Evidence of Social or Behavioral Mediators? Kelly Cotter 1, Barbara Kerschner 2, Justin Martin 2, Leigh Powell 2, Daniel Rodda.
Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,
Condom Use and Anal Intercourse in Heterosexual Men and Women Kimberly R. McBride, Ph.D. 1,2,3 Erick Janssen, Ph.D. 2,4 1 Department of Pediatrics, Section.
INTRODUCTION MEASURES RESULTS HYPOTHESES CONCLUSIONS RESULTS
Loneliness in Marriage Scale
The Effect of Social Media on Sexual Cognitions and Behaviors
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
Chrysalis Wright & Mark Rubin
Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Intention to
Paul B. Ingram IV2 and Brian P. Cole1
The Relationship Between Instagram Photo Editing and Undergraduate College Women’s Body Dissatisfaction Madeline Wick, Cindy Miller-Perrin, & Jennifer.
Sex Differences in Gender, Orientation, and Identity
Standardized Coefficients (Beta)
Falling in Love Experiences in an Iranian Sample
Sexual Imagery & Thinking About Sex
Shame-Coping and the Big Five Personality Traits
Renae Franiuk1 & Shelby Robinson2
University of Mount Union
Prior Crime Exposure and Social Distance: The Case of Victimization
College Women’s Perpetration of Adulthood Animal Abuse
Introduction Method Results Conclusions
Christian Hahn, M.Sc. & Lorne Campbell, PhD
Paranormal Experiences are Predictive of Poorer Mental Health
Religious, Cognitive, & Personality Predictors of Intelligence
Parental Status and Emergency Preparedness:
Individual Characteristics
Introduction Hypotheses Results Discussion Method
Elle A. Moore, Danica Kulibert, Alexandria R. Ebert, Susan H. McFadden
Tamara L. Sims, MA1, Jeanne L. Tsai, PhD1 and Mary K
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
Religiosity and Romantic Beliefs
Introduction Methods Discussion Hypotheses Results References
Friendship Quality as a Moderator
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Validation of the Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy Scale
My, But We are Impressive
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Participants and Procedures
Justin D. Hackett, Benjamin J. Marcus, and Allen M. Omoto
ABSTRACT PROCEDURE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Krystle Lange & Regan A. R. Gurung University of Wisconsin, Green Bay
Introduction and Hypotheses
Laura M. Sylke & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
General Social Competence (18)
The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.
Introduction Results Discussion Hypotheses Method
Morgan M. Welch & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Effects of Sexualization in Advertisements
Presentation transcript:

Predicting Variations in Motivations for Romantic Kissing Is a Kiss Just a Kiss?: Predicting Variations in Motivations for Romantic Kissing Elle Moore, Danica Kulibert, B.S., Ashley Thompson, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Gender Differences > Romantic Kissing Romantic kissing is defined as “lip-to-lip contact that may or may not be prolonged” between two individuals in a sexual, intimate setting (Jankowiak, Volsche, & Garcia, 2015). It is often referred to as a gateway behavior that may serve as a transition into more intimate and risky behaviors (O’Sullivan, Cheng, Harris & Brooks-Gunn, 2007). Kissing has also been cited as an important behavior used when expressing love between romantic partners (Regan et al., 2007; Welsch et al., 2005). Although romantic kissing has been considered both common and significant enough to include in studies of sexual behavior, few studies have examined why individuals engage in romantic kissing. Thus, the current study sought to obtain a better understanding of romantic kissing by examining its many descriptive characteristics. In addition, the role romantic kissing plays in one’s life was also assessed by examining reasons why people may engage in it. Method Participants 461 U.S. adults (216 men, 246 women) M (age) = 32.18 years (SD = 10.73) Heterosexual (81%) In a committed relationship (71.3%) Measures Demographic Questionnaire Brief Sexual Attitudes Scale (Hendrick, Hendrick, & Reich, 2006) Religiosity Scale (Whisman et al., 2007) International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg, 1999) YKiss? Scale (Thompson, Anisimowicz, & Kulibert, under review) 42 items Instructed to indicate how frequently an item led them to kiss someone from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal) Subscales Relational/Sexual Motive Subscale (α = 0.93) Ex: “It feels good”, “I wanted to express my love” Goal Attainment/Insecurity Motive Subscale (α = 0.96) Ex: “I wanted attention”, “I felt obligated” = 1 Men report goal attainment/insecurity motives for romantic kissing (M = 1.83, SD = 0.89) significantly more than do women (M = 1.51, SD = .70), t(460) = 4.30, p < .001. Both men (M = 3.23, SD = 0.88) and women (M = 3.30, SD = .88) equally report relational/sexual motives for romantic kissing, t(460) = 0.79, p > .05. Who Are Adults Kissing? Predicting Relational/Sexual Motives for Romantic Kissing Predicting Motives for Romantic Kissing Although motives for romantic kissing are not well studied, related research assessing motives for other sexual behaviors has been conducted more extensively. Thus, variables that influence motives for other sexual behaviors and sexual attitudes likely predict motives for romantic kissing. Gender: Men typically report more physical motives for sexual intercourse and women report more emotional motives (Buss & Meston, 2007). Age: Older people report a greater number of motives for sexual intercourse than do younger people (Meston, Hamilton, & Harte, 2009). Sexual Attitudes: Individuals with less permissive sexual attitudes report greater goal-oriented motives for sexual intercourse than do those with more permissive attitudes (Jones, 1998). Religiosity: People higher in religiosity report more negative attitudes toward casual sex than are those lower in religiosity (Murray, Ciarrocchi, & Murray-Swank, 2007). Personality: Openness and Extraversion appear to relate to both sexual attitudes and sexual interests (Costa et al., 1992; Thompson & O’Sullivan, 2012). Predictors R2 β sr 0.35   Gender 0.03 Age -0.12 -0.12** Sexual Attitudes -0.05 Religiosity 0.02 Extraversion 0.30 0.24*** Agreeableness -0.06 -0.04 Conscientiousness 0.11 0.08 Neuroticism 0.18 0.12* Openness to Experience 0.05 a N = 461; F(9, 452) = 7.10, p < .001 b Gender: Men = 0, Women = 1 c * = p < .05, ** = p < .01, *** p < .001 Note. Pie chart displays responses to the item: “Among those who you have kissed, what percentage of them have been people you were in a romantic relationship with? Do People Enjoy Kissing? When Do Adults Report Experiencing Their First Kiss? M = 58.72 SD = 38.13 Predicting Goal Attainment/Insecurity Motives for Romantic Kissing M = 15.97 SD = 3.53 Frequency Frequency Predictors R2 β sr 0.42   Gender -0.11 -0.13** Age -0.02 Sexual Attitudes 0.13 0.16** Religiosity 0.15 0.19*** Extraversion 0.28 0.27*** Agreeableness -0.32 -0.30*** Conscientiousness -0.23 -0.19*** Neuroticism 0.09 0.07 Openness to Experience -0.01 a N = 461; F(9, 452) = 35.90, p < .001 b Gender: Men = 0, Women = 1 c * = p < .05, ** = p < .01, *** p < .001 Percentage of Kisses Enjoyed Age of First Kiss Note. Bar graph displays responses to the item: “Among those who you have kissed, what percentage of them did you enjoy kissing?” How Many People Do Adults Report Kissing? Why Do People Kiss? The Current Study To advance the literature on motives for romantic kissing, the current study was designed to obtain a better understanding of romantic kissing and the role it play in adults’ lives. In particular, who people are kissing and how much they enjoy kissing. In addition, the current study sought to evaluate the predictive utility of a variety of variables that account for variations in adults’ motives for romantic kissing. Consistent with prior research on sexual motives, attitudes, and experiences, it was hypothesized that gender, age, sexual attitudes, religiosity, and personality would influence motives for romantic kissing. As the current study is exploratory in nature, no specific hypotheses were made regarding the direction of the relationships between these variables and motives for romantic kissing. Discussion and Implications M = 20.36 SD = 41.88 Adults reported a wide-range in motives for romantic kissing, with the sexual/relational motives being reported most often. Although the goal attainment/insecurity motives were reported less frequently, it is important not to overlook these “maladaptive motives” because of their potential implications. Surprisingly, men reported more goal attainment/insecurity motives than did women. This is inconsistent with the generally held notion that women use intimate/sexual behaviors as a means, often to obtain power, more than do men. Those younger in age and higher Neuroticism and Extraversion were most likely to report kissing for sexual/relational motives. Men, those higher in religiosity and Extraversion, lower in Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, and with more permissive sexual attitudes were most likely to report kissing for goal attainment/insecurity motives. These findings demonstrate the importance of romantic kissing to romantic relationships and the need for more in-depth research into this aspect of human sexuality. Frequency Number of People Kissed This research was supported, in part, by the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Undergraduate Student/Faculty Collaborative Research Small Grant. Note. The bar graph above depicts the most commonly endorsed and the three least commonly endorsed kissing motives on a 5-point Likert scale.