Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The New Millennium Learners Francesc Pedró. Contents Why is this project relevant? Why is this project relevant? Main research questions Main research.
Advertisements

Measuring and Monitoring the Quality of Education Christopher Colclough University of Cambridge.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment Learning trends Maciej Jakubowski 10 February 2011 Learning Trends Changes in student performance.
Too much computer and Internet use is bad for your grades, especially if you are young and poor Elizabeth A. Dos Santos EME 2040.
Social Context of Computing Chapter 7. Digital Divide  Technological inequalities  Impact of communication technologies  Radio  Television  Press.
TM Confidential and Proprietary. Copyright © 2007 by Educational Testing Service. 1.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Trends and issues in higher education Bo Hansson Indicators and Analysis Division Directorate of Education, OECD HEGESCO Advisory Board Meeting Ljubljana,
Raising the Quality of Educational Outcomes and Improving E-learning: Cross-national Evidence on Challenges and Opportunities Judit Kádár-Fülöp Indicators.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
Does Formative Feedback Help or Hinder Students? An Empirical Investigation 2015 DEE Conference Carlos Cortinhas, University of Exeter.
ATIA 2009 Accessible Online State Assessment Compared to Paper-Based Testing: Is There a Difference in Results? Presenters: Linnie Lee, Bluegrass Technology.
1 THE NET IMPACT ON HEALTH DIVIDE FACTS PACK Naples, 13th March 2000.
ראמ " ה The National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education Correlation between Pre-primary Education and Achievements in PISA 2009 Joel.
Improving Equity & Quality of Education in Thailand Using the results from International and National Assessments [PISA, TIMSS, & National Test]
Global Event on Measuring the Information Society Geneva, 27 – 29 May 2008 Session 4: Measurement of ICT impact Broadband impacts on Internet use.
1 United States Education at a Glance 2015 Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills Release date: 24 November 2015.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
Exercises Causal Comparative Research Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şehnaz Şahinkarakaş.
Developing valuable and relevant skills and attributes at L4 to improve retention- a multi-school investigation Alison Day, Dr. Iulia Mihai , Dr. Allan.
DIGITAL LITERACY of students and teachers
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Analysis of Relationships among Variables
What have we learned from PISA and TIMSS?
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Overview Why collect data on families Rethinking family influences
RESEARCH ON OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS OF PEER EDUCATION IN TUSCANY
Teacher ICT Readiness A Baseline Study 2016
Innovative Teaching at Faughanvale P.S.
Ramifications of Digital Citizenship
Teacher ICT Readiness A Baseline Study 2016
OECD Strategic Education Governance A perspective for Scotland
Digital Technology in Mathematics Education
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
Release of PARCC Student Results
Mariya International School
Correlation A Lecture for the Intro Stat Course
The Leadership and Learning Center
Theme 7 Correlation.
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results
Between-school Variance in Achievement
Mastery and the new curriculum
OECD Reviews of Migrant Education: Norway
Year 12 into 13 bridging work
Young Lives, University of Oxford
Australia Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Education Policy Leadership Conference March 14, 2008
Hong Kong, China Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Sweden Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Singapore Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Korea Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Norway Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Lithuania Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Japan Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Italy Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
England (U.K.) Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Slovenia Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
The United States of America
Ontario (Canada) Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Hungary Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Quebec (Canada) Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Israel Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
New Zealand Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Russian Federation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Happiness Index Analysis
The OECD Average Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Indonesia Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Exercises Causal Comparative Research
Presentation transcript:

Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009 The New Millennium Learners: Technology and Educational Performance (PISA 2006 data) Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009 Strand of work within the NML project, examining PISA 2006 data to investigate any relationships between use of technology and educational attainment among 15 year olds. Carried out by team both within CERI and in collaboration with other directorates in OECD. Policy background that instigated work: the fact that there seems to be little or contradictory evidence on the impact of ICT on educational performance. So have the high investments in ICT made by most if nto all countries over the last 10-20 years been paying off? In what ways? PISA data provide good comparative statistics on subject knowledge that can help us to answer some of these questions. 2006: focus on science

Access to ICT in schools is almost universal in OECD countries… One indicator of access is simply experience of computer use. Almost all 15 year olds in OECD countries has some experience of using computers. In terms of access to computers at school, all OECD countries but Mexico report that 100% of students are in schools with at least one computer. In mexico this is the case for 98% of students.

…but relatively low levels of use Also interesting to see to what extent students actually use computers at school. Average for OECD who declare never to use a computer at school is 12%, ranging widely from 1% in Denmark to 42% in Korea.

Increasing investment in ICT infrastructure in schools… Increasing investment in ICT since 2000, seems to have leveled off since 2003 with an average of 0.2 computers per student, i.e. five students per computer. But cross-country variation. This may mean that no significant investments in computer equipment have been taking place between 2003 and 2006 or that these have been used to replace old computers by new ones.

…matched by increasing access to ICT at home. Data on educational resources at home. Left hand side OECD countries. Countries where majority of students use computers at home for schoolwork also have a link to the internet, but links to the internet more limited in general. Also interesting that books more present that educational software in all countries.

ICT use at home is higher than at schools In al countries except Hungary students report using the computer at home more than at school. Finally, PISA data does not provide enough information to learn whether home use and school use might be influencing each other. What it does show though, is that one is not increasing against the other, as students frequent use on average in OECD countries increased in a similar percentage in both places since PISA 2003. Nevertheless, it is important to learn more about this relationship and to design school policies that develop a closer connection between student’s ICT uses at home and at school. This is relevant first, because it would allow connecting school and home learning more closely by, for example, developing online learning resources that students could access and use from their homes. Second, because schools could build a bridge between students’ outside culture and in-school culture, by for example including some of the out-of-school digital activities into school lessons or after-school activities. And thirdly, schools could be able to have a more fluent communication with parents and engage them more actively in their children’s education, by for example promoting Internet communication with parents.

No association between school ICT use and educational performance Turning to ICT use and educational performance. This graph shows no association between frequency of use at school and performance in science in PISA 2006. In fact on average in OECD countries frequent users perform slightly lower than moderate or rare/non-users.

Clear association between home ICT use and educational performance, but… In every country rare or non-users score lower than their peers reporting frequent use at home. But not all of these differences are significant in all countries.

… the association is not linear. Time use optimum? Earlier studies suggested that what matters is not so much how much ICT is used but the types of usage. Developed indices for measuring students; overal ICT usage on a continuous scale. Students divided into four groups: top group is most frequent users, bottom group least frequent users. More frequent users more likely to have lower scores. Second quarter students have highest scores. This does not mean that ICT usage leads to higher or lower scores, just association. Similar findings from PISA 2003 for maths and PISA 2006 for reading.

Key messages Less than 1% of 15-year-old students in OECD countries have never used a computer The majority use a computer at home frequently, less so at school Educational software is the least used educational resource at home in most countries There is a stronger correlation between educational performance and frequency of computer use at home than at school In the light of the progress made since 2000 it may be expected that the remaining 1% will have faded by now. Lack of association between school use and educational performance may be due to critical level of use not having been achieved.

Thank you katerina.ananiadou@oecd.org