Discrete Choice Models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Part 12] 1/38 Discrete Choice Modeling Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Advertisements

[Part 13] 1/30 Discrete Choice Modeling Hybrid Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Rural Economy Research Centre Modelling taste heterogeneity among walkers in Ireland Edel Doherty Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC) Teagasc Department.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
12. Random Parameters Logit Models. Random Parameters Model Allow model parameters as well as constants to be random Allow multiple observations with.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Error Component models Ric Scarpa Prepared for the Choice Modelling Workshop 1st and 2nd of May Brisbane Powerhouse, New Farm Brisbane.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Housing Demand in Germany and Japan Borsch-Supan, Heiss, and Seko, JHE 10, (2001) Presented by Mark L. Trueman, 11/25/02.
Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice: Recent Developments and Contrasts with Bayesian Estimation William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Choice modelling in marketing- some examples Hans S. Solgaard, Department of Environmental and Business Economics June 2008.
15. Stated Preference Experiments. Panel Data Repeated Choice Situations Typically RP/SP constructions (experimental) Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial.
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Substitution between Mass-Produced and High-End Beers Daniel Toro-Gonzalez Ph.D. candidate, School of Economic Sciences (SES) Jill J. McCluskey Visiting.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Berry-Levensohn-Pakes EMA (1995) Paper Notes ECON 721.
[Part 9] 1/79 Discrete Choice Modeling Modeling Heterogeneity Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
The Annual Meeting of the RSAI – The Israeli Branch, Tel-Aviv University, January 10, 2010 Development and estimation of a semi- compensatory residential.
Part 24: Stated Choice [1/117] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Limited Dependent Variables Ciaran S. Phibbs. Limited Dependent Variables 0-1, small number of options, small counts, etc. 0-1, small number of options,
14. Scaling and Heteroscedasticity. Using Degenerate Branches to Reveal Scaling Travel Fly Rail Air CarTrain Bus LIMB BRANCH TWIG DriveGrndPblc.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Lexicographic / discontinuous choices. Lexicographic choices  Respondents base their choice on a subset of the presented attributes  Continuity axiom.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Non-Linear Dependent Variables Ciaran S. Phibbs November 17, 2010.
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives The conditional logit model has imbedded in it a property which, if violated in reality, makes the use of the model.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
A New Approach to Measure Preferences of Users in Built Environments: Integrating Cognitive Mapping and Utility Models Benedict Dellaert Erasmus University.
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Efficiency Measurement
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Vehicle Attributes: What Do We know?
Discrete Choice Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
A Meta-Analysis of Two Gauteng SP Data Sets
Presentation transcript:

Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University

Modeling Heterogeneity Part 12 Modeling Heterogeneity

Several Types of Heterogeneity Observational: Observable differences across choice makers Choice strategy: How consumers make decisions. (E.g., omitted attributes) Structure: Model frameworks Preferences: Model ‘parameters’

Attention to Heterogeneity Modeling heterogeneity is important Attention to heterogeneity – an informal survey of four literatures Levels Scaling Economics ● None Education Marketing Much Transport Extensive

Heterogeneity in Choice Strategy Consumers avoid ‘complexity’ Lexicographic preferences eliminate certain choices  choice set may be endogenously determined Simplification strategies may eliminate certain attributes Information processing strategy is a source of heterogeneity in the model.

“Structural Heterogeneity” Marketing literature Latent class structures Yang/Allenby - latent class random parameters models Kamkura et al – latent class nested logit models with fixed parameters

Accommodating Heterogeneity Observed? Enter in the model in familiar (and unfamiliar) ways. Unobserved? Takes the form of randomness in the model.

Heterogeneity and the MNL Model Limitations of the MNL Model: IID  IIA Fundamental tastes are the same across all individuals How to adjust the model to allow variation across individuals? Full random variation Latent clustering – allow some variation

Observable Heterogeneity in Utility Levels Choice, e.g., among brands of cars xitj = attributes: price, features zit = observable characteristics: age, sex, income

Observable Heterogeneity in Preference Weights

Heteroscedasticity in the MNL Model • Motivation: Scaling in utility functions • If ignored, distorts coefficients • Random utility basis Uij = j + ’xij + ’zi + jij i = 1,…,N; j = 1,…,J(i) F(ij) = Exp(-Exp(-ij)) now scaled • Extensions: Relaxes IIA Allows heteroscedasticity across choices and across individuals

‘Quantifiable’ Heterogeneity in Scaling wit = observable characteristics: age, sex, income, etc.

Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity Modeling individual heterogeneity Latent class – Discrete approximation Mixed logit – Continuous The mixed logit model (generalities) Data structure – RP and SP data Induces heterogeneity Induces heteroscedasticity – the scaling problem

Heterogeneity Modeling observed and unobserved individual heterogeneity Latent class – Discrete variation Mixed logit – Continuous variation The generalized mixed logit model