Novel Trial Design Focus - Left Main and “All Comers” DES Studies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Advertisements

Lésion du tronc commun : reste-t-il une place pour la chirurgie ? La vision de l’angioplasticien Y. Louvard, ICPS, Massy.
Is this the “spioenkop” for CABG?
Introduction Recent guidelines considered PCI to be a potential alternative to CABG for ULMCA stenosis, based on several large registries and randomized.
ARTS I & II Keith D Dawkins Southampton University Hospital.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators Professor of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute, Asan.
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
EXCEL Randomized Comparison of PCI vs. CABG for Low/Intermediate Risk LM: Study Rationale Bonnie H. Weiner MD MSEC MBA FSCAI FACC FAHA Professor of Medicine.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Revascularization Strategy: Syntax Score and Beyond
Martin B. Leon, MD Key Messages Tryton Pivotal: Randomized Trial and
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Prof. Dr. med. Sigmund Silber Cardiology Practice and Hospital
Ajay J. Kirtane, MD I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
Damian Gimpel Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit Journal Club
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Long-Term Forecasting and Comparison of Mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness.
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. Director of Cardiovascular Research
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Vladimir Ganyukov, MD, PhD
SYNTAX at 2 Years: This Interventionalist’s Perspective
Debate: What Does the Future Hold for the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease? More PCI No More Routine Surgery Ron Waksman, MD, FACC Washington.
BVS Expand: First Results of Wide Clinical Applications
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
A Pooled Analysis From SYNTAX and BEST Randomized trials
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
The Guidelines Should Be Change!
EXCEL Evaluation of Xience Prime versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization Gregg W. Stone MD Columbia University.
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Unprotected Left Main Intervention How To Perform A Safe PCI
EXCEL Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with an Xience everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or CABG. They.
How and why this study may change my practice ?
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
for the SPIRIT IV Investigators
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
for the SPIRIT IV Investigators
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
NOBLE Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) (88% biolimus) or CABG. They.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Presentation transcript:

Novel Trial Design Focus - Left Main and “All Comers” DES Studies Left Main Interventional View Gregg W. Stone MD Columbia University Medical Center The Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Gregg W. Stone, MD DISCLOSURES Honoraria Boston Scientific Corporation, Abbott Vascular

YES: SYNTAX leaves many questions unanswered Do we really need another randomized trial of PCI vs. CABG for LM disease? YES: SYNTAX leaves many questions unanswered SYNTAX suggests (but doesn’t prove) that: PCI and CABG for LM ds. have similar rates of death/MI/stroke PCI may be acceptable or superior for certain LM subsets Could the results be further improved with a better DES? What is the optimal approach to the distal bifurcation? Could IVUS and/or FFR improve outcomes?

MACCE to 1 Year Left Main Subset (n=700) Serruys PW et al. NEJM 2009 TAXUS (N=357) CABG (N=348) 6 12 20 40 Months Since Allocation Cumulative Event Rate (%) P=0.44* 15.8% 13.6% Event rate ± 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test ITT population Serruys PW et al. NEJM 2009 5

MACCE to 2 Years by SYNTAX Score Tercile Left Main SYNTAX Score 33 TAXUS (N=135) CABG (N=149) CABG PCI P-value Death 4.1% 10.4% 0.04 CVA 4.2% 0.8% 0.08 MI 6.1% 8.4% 0.48 Death, CVA or MI 11.5% 15.6% 0.32 Revasc. 9.2% 21.8% 0.003 Left Main 40 P=0.02 30 29.7% Cumulative Event Rate (%) 20 17.8% 2-Year_Randomized_SX 33+(Core)-Overall.doc Exhibit 1 10 12 24 Months Since Allocation Cumulative KM Event Rate ± 1.5 SE; log-rank P value Site-reported data; ITT population

MACCE to 2 Years by SYNTAX Score Tercile Left Main SYNTAX Scores 0-32 TAXUS (N=221) CABG (N=196) CABG PCI P-value Death 7.9% 2.7% 0.02 CVA 3.3% 0.9% 0.09 MI 2.6% 3.8% 0.59 Death, CVA or MI 12.1% 6.9% 0.06 Revasc. 11.4% 14.3% 0.44 Left Main 40 30 P=0.48 Cumulative Event Rate (%) 20 20.5% 18.3% 2-Year_Randomized_SX0-22(Core)-Overall.doc Exhibit 1 10 12 24 Months Since Allocation Cumulative KM Event Rate ± 1.5 SE; log-rank P value Site-reported Data; ITT population

What Would an Informative Trial of Left Main DES vs. CABG Look Like? It wouldn’t be an all-comers trial! - Exclude pts who clearly should go to CABG, e.g. high SYNTAX scores Optimize PCI technique Pre-specify when/how to use IVUS, staged procedures, RX of distal bifurcation, no routine angio FU, etc. Use the best stent and adjunctive pharmacology Optimize CABG technique - Minimize waiting time to CABG, maximize pan-arterial revascularization, adjunctive pharmacology, etc. Use a meaningful 1º endpoint: D or MI or CVA ~2500 randomized pts

4000 pts with left main disease Consensus agreement by heart team EXCEL: Study Design Draft design 4000 pts with left main disease SYNTAX score ≤32 Consensus agreement by heart team Yes (N=2500) No (N=1500) PCI and CABG registries (limited in-hosp data) R PCI (Xience Prime) (N=1250) CABG (N=1250) Clinical follow-up: 30 days, 6 months, yearly through 5 years This trial design has not yet been reviewed by the US FDA and is subject to change

EXCEL: Inclusion Criteria Draft design Significant LM ds. by heart team consensus Angiographic DS ≥70%, or Angiographic DS ≥50% to <70% with a markedly positive noninvasive study, and/or IVUS MLA <6.0 mm2, and/or FFR <0.80 Clinical and anatomic eligibility for both PCI and CABG by heart team consensus Silent ischemia, stable angina, unstable angina or recent MI This trial design has not yet been reviewed by the US FDA and is subject to change

Draft design EXCEL: Endpoints Primary endpoint: Death, MI, or stroke at median follow-up of 3 years Major secondary endpoint: Death, MI, stroke or unplanned revascularization at median follow-up of 3 years Power analysis: Both endpoints are powered for sequential noninferiority and superiority testing Quality of life and cost-effectiveness assessments: At regular intervals This trial design has not yet been reviewed by the US FDA and is subject to change

EXCEL: Organization (i) Principal Investigators: - Interventional: Patrick W. Serruys, Gregg W. Stone - Surgical: A. Pieter Kappetein, Joseph F. Sabik Executive Operations Committee: - 4 principal investigators, Peter-Paul Kint, Martin B. Leon, Alexandra Lansky, Roxana Mehran, Marie-Angèle Morel, Chuck Simonton, David Taggart, Lynn Vandertie, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Jessie Coe, Poornima Sood, Ali Akavand, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Thomas Engels Optimal Therapy Committee Chairs PCI: Martin B. Leon Surgery: David Taggart Medical: Bernard Gersh

EXCEL: Organization (ii) Countries and Country Leaders (PCI and CABG) United States: David Kandzari and John Puskas Europe: Marie-Claude Morice and David Taggart Brazil: Alex Abizaid and Luis Carlos Bento Sousa Argentina: Jorge Belardi and Daniel Navia Canada: Erick Schampaert and Marc Ruel S. Korea: Seung-Jung Park and Jay-Won Lee Data Safety and Monitoring Board - Lars Wallentin, Chair Academic Research Organizations - Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Cardialysis Sponsor: Abbott Vascular

EXCEL: Status After 10 months of formal preparation the protocol is nearly finalized The site selection process is underway FDA meetings and global regulatory submissions are being prepared First patient enrolled: 3rd Quarter 2010