GRAVITY in Yosemite Valley

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weighing Earth. Announcements & Reminders 1. ES 123 Essay: Due Friday November 24, 3:00 p.m. (B&GS 10) 2. Lab final: Tuesday December 5, 10: :20.
Advertisements

GRAVITY SURVEY (i) -Introduction- June, Gravity Survey Measurements of the gravitational field at a series of different locations over an area of.
Gravity Janice Kukuk Rob Ghigieri Ross Whitmore
Interpretation of Seafloor Gravity Anomalies. Gravity measurements of the seafloor provide information about subsurface features. For example they help.
Fundamental Relationships Magnetic Force and Coulomb's Law The study of magnetics begins with a description of magnetic forces. The force exerted between.
Chapter 17 Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties
LaCoste-Romberg.
Applied Geophysics What is it
Applied Geophysics An Introduction
Gravity in the Fernley & Hazen Flat Areas Geol 492/692 Spring 2005 Melissa Edwards, Harmony Farnsworth, and Rich Redd.
Nyack - Geophysical Characterization Problem - determine subsurface parameters, relevant to fluid flow and basin evolution, from non-invasive observations.
Summary of Geophysical Results From the NSF Funded Biocomplexity Project: Chris Hawkins, MS Thesis: Imaging the Shallow Subsurface Using Ground Penetrating.
GEOL 414 Applied Geophysics Fall Semester 2006 Principles of various geophysical methods and their application to geologic problems. Prerequisites: Geology.
Gravity Theory Measurement practices –Relative –Closed loops Corrections –Drift –Free Air –Bouguer –Terrain Interpretation –Modeling.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
GG 450 Feb 21, 2008 Magnetic Interpretation. Homework return.
GEOL 3000 With Assistance from Nigel Wattrus.  Seismic Reflection  Seismic Reflection – subhorizontal geologic structures  Siesmic Refraction  Siesmic.
GRAVITY. EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD 978 Gals 983 Gals 1 Gal = 1 cm/sec² ELLIPSOID North-South change ~1 mGals/km ~1.5 mGals/mile ~1  Gals/m ~.3  Gals/ft.
GRAVITY SURVEY (ii) -Gravity Data Correction-
Model of the theoretical gravity Normal gravity Elevation effect The effect of material beneath the station - the plate effect Topographic or terrain effect.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
Practical issues (This lecture is based largely on: The shape of the gravity anomaly depends not on the absolute.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
GG 450 Lecture 3 1/22/08 Gravity Corrections Potential Geoid.
Exploration and Environmental Geophysics
Gravity 4 Gravity Modeling.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Gravity surveys Annie, Sue, Betsy. Regional location Bango Road canal bank V-line canal bank Reno Highway Carson Highway.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
GravStat™ A OEX Technology Registered in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office and offered through Lockhart Geophysical GravStat™ A method of determining.
GRAVITY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION SCHURZ, NV BY: DREW JONES AND MARLON RAMOS GPH 492/692, SPRING 2013.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
An E-W gravity profile across the La Bajada fault Zone in the Rio Grande Rift, North Central New Mexico Rajesh Goteti University of Rochester SAGE 2007.
Field Geophysics – Lecture 3
Potential Fields Methods Potential Fields A potential field is  a field in which the magnitude and direction (vector) of the measurement depends on the.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Gravity Summary In first approximation we can chose for the shape of the Earth an ellipsoid of rotation defined essentially by the degree n=2 m=0 of the.
Variation of G with latitude
Field Geophysics – Lecture 2 1)Brief introduction to earthquakes in ECSZ 2)Introduction to gravity – measurement and interpretation Reading: Chapter.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Last Time: Gravity Measurements may be surface-based (i.e., taken with instruments placed on the ground surface) or space-based ; absolute or relative.
Measurement and Geometry 53 Wikipedia world map Lines of Longitude Earth rotates in 1 day = 24 hours 1 rotation = ÷ 24 = 15 1 hour = 15 2 hours.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Mar 2016 Lab 6 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Gravity Start by discussing lab 3 assignment & your assignment for two weeks from.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 21 Mar 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Wed 23 Mar: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Gravity Reduction For terrestrial.
GRAVITY.
Gravity Data Reduction
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Mar 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Fri 25 Mar: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Density; Gravity Anomalies & Modeling.
Gravity modeling as guidance for salt interpretation: a case study from the Western Gulf of Mexico Irina Filina* (formerly at Hess Corporation, currently.
Gravity 3.
Gravity II: Gravity anomaly due to a simple-shape buried body
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem
Gravity Methods (II) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Emily Maher, Brian Kuhns, and Slava Russky
Electrical Resistivity Survey of Yosemite Valley, CA
Final review sessions - II
Gravity and Magnetic Surveying
Lecture 15 Resistivity-GPR
Gravity Interpretation
Chapter 2 – Mapping Our World
Two major types of gravimeters
Gravity of the Reno Basin
Gravity Theory Measurement practices Corrections Interpretation
Outline Construction of gravity and magnetic models Reference models
Field Geophysics Instructors Tom Herring, Brad Hager Web: 01/20/05
Presentation transcript:

GRAVITY in Yosemite Valley MICHELLE DUNN JORDAN BARKER CHEYENNE LAWRENCE PHILLIP ZURN

LaCoste and Romberg G509 A relative gravimeter Gravimeter measures local gravitational field of the Earth Susceptible to vibrations due to sensitivity Voltage > 12.0v 2 hour loop for drift correction GPS assist

Methods - Data Collection Stable paved or rocky location Center the Long and Cross Levels using the adjustment knobs Unlock arrestment knob Gravity reading is taken once the cross hair in the light beam settles on 3.2 Reading is taken to two decimal places

Yosemite Valley Transects on March 19th - 21st

Methods - Corrections Drift Elevation Correction Terrain Instrument Tidal Elevation Correction Free-Air Bouguer Slab Terrain Inner: SBA Outer: CBA

Zone BCDEF Inner Terrain Correction

Outer Terrain Correction

Outer Terrain Corrections: QCTool Input lidar file as csv Obtain easting and northing Input DEM - GTOPO30 Resolution 30 arc second Output terrain corrections

Simple Bouguer Anomaly vs Latitude

SBA vs Latitude for Transect 2

SBA vs Longitude W E

Depth vs Latitude S N S N

Depth vs Latitude for Transect 2 ⍴ = -0.5 g/cc ⍴ = -0.7 g/cc S N S N

Depth vs Latitude

Gravity Uncertainties Lies primarily with terrain corrections Terrain correction: 4.5 mGal Uncertainty in basin thickness assuming ⍴ = -0.7 g/cc: 150 meters Uncertainties due to lack of knowledge of basin densities Using Gutenberg max depth of 600 m, ⍴=-0.945 g/cc Sierra Granite ⍴=2.67 g/cc, not realistic to have basin sediment < 2.0 g/cc

Conclusions and Future Work “Double camel” geometry with deepest point under El Capitan Constrain density contrast Validation of terrain correction with other DEM or 3D modeling of lidar Absolute gravity calculation Comparison with ReMi and resistivity data

References Gutenberg, Beno, John P. Buwalda, and Robert P. Sharp. "Seismic explorations on the floor of Yosemite Valley, California." Geological Society of America Bulletin 67.8 (1956): 1051-1078. Telford, William Murray, Lloyd P. Geldart, and Robert E. Sheriff. Applied geophysics. Vol. 1. Cambridge university press, 1990. Louie, John. "GPH 492." GPH 492/692 - Applied Geophysics. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 May 2017. Huber, N. King, Paul C. Bateman, and Clyde Wahrhaftig. Geologic map of Yosemite National Park and vicinity, California. No. 1874. 1989.