Child benefits policies: comparative analysis of Russian regions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The system of welfare in Russia and other countries.
Advertisements

Assistance for families: An assessment of Australian family policies from an international perspective Peter Whiteford, Social Policy Research Centre,
1 Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin.
Poverty and Economic Inequality
University Admission in Russia: Do the Wealthier Benefit from Standardized Exams? Ilya Prakhov, Maria Yudkevich Center for Institutional Studies at the.
EVALUATION OF MAJOR POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS BY RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTRIES WITH ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACORDING TO WVS DEMIDOVA.
TITLE Author department Higher School of Economics, Moscow,
Employment Decisions of European Women After Childbirth Chiara Pronzato (ISER) EPUNet Conference, May 9th 2006.
The family in Norwegian society Anne Skevik Grødem, NOVA – Norwegian Social Research.
Social Welfare Policymaking Chapter 18
Pre-Transition Poverty Respectable standard of living Sufficient income for food Housing was provided universally at a nominal price Health care and education.
Module 10 The Role of Government Income Distribution in Canada Poverty In Canada.
Chapter 12: Low-Income Assistance Chapter 12 Low-Income Assistance Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
SITUATION ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS IN THE AREA OF FAMILY POLICY IN SLOVENIA Ružica Boškić Child Observatory Social protection Institute of.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 6: Maternity leave and related types of leave Maternity.
Tatyana Maleva Child Poverty and Social Exclusion in Russia III Intergovernmental Conference On Children in Europe and Central Asia Palencia, 2006.
Government Spending In 2001, total government expenditures amounted to nearly $2.9 trillion. On a per capita basis, this amounted to almost $10,300 for.
1 Chapter 12 Income Distribution, Poverty, and Discrimination Key Concepts Summary Practice Quiz Internet Exercises ©2002 South-Western College Publishing.
1 Chapter 12 Income Distribution, Poverty, and Discrimination Key Concepts Summary Practice Quiz Internet Exercises ©2002 South-Western College Publishing.
Recap’ session. Rules of Jeopardy Social Protection Floor Initiative Each round, the team selects a representative The representative chooses a number.
Chapter 3 section 4 Providing a Safety Net Income and Poverty In a Market economy, income depends primarily on earnings, which depend on the value of each.
Social Assistance Pilots Program SA Pilots Seminar Social assistance to able to work unemployed based on their participation in public works Liudmyla Kotusenko.
Russia’s Workforce Development Study of the Global Policy Network (GPN) – Informal Employment in Russia Oksana Sinyavskaya Daria Popova Workforce Development.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
Poverty The United States is one of the richest nations in the world. Yet not all share equally in this prosperity.
10/27/20151 Introduction to Family Studies Welfare Reform.
Social Situation in Russia: the Social Quality Approach Natalia S. Grigorieva Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov Taiwan, March, 2007.
HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEY EVALUATION. PROJECT OVERVIEW PRECURSORS State Program on Poverty Reduction & Sustainable Development ( ) CSOs given the.
Providing a Safety Net. Why Households Differ One of the main reasons why household income differs is because the number of household members who work.
Transformation of the Public Sector Changes in the Social Policy Ing. Katarina Poluncova Department of Public Economy.
Oxana Sinyavskaya, High School of Economics (Moscow) Use of Parental leave policies in the Russian Federation 11th.
Explain the concept of a welfare state State the rationale for Britain’s system of welfare state Describe the source of money for British’s healthcare.
MATERNAL HEALTHCARE Clayton Rush Michael Xiong Maya Ben-Yosef Kyle Fein Harliv Kaur.
Ageing and the Changing Nature of Intergenerational Flows in Thailand
3/8/20161 Family Sociology Welfare Reform. 3/8/20162 Families & Poverty  The percentage living below poverty has changed little over the past 20 years.
Economic Challenges Chapter 13 Section 3 Poverty.
II Annual China-Russia Conference: "The Role of the State in the Economy in the 21st century", 2006 Poverty Is No Crime: Measuring Poverty in Russian Regions.
«Population Matters in the Russian Federation» FIRST Deputy Minister of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation Sergey F. VELMYAYKIN.
Development of More Equitable and Sustainable Social Protection System Alexey Vovchenko 2016, Shanghai.
Comparative Analysis of the social security legislation in view of a possible future ratification of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention.
Challenges of Competition Policy in Food Value Chains: comments based on Russian experience Food Value Chains and BRICS Competition Law, May Higher.
SOCIAL PROTECTION AND INCLUSION IN KAZAKHSTAN 22 June 2016, Almaty.
Promoting social cohesion in Korea. Social spending is low but increasing rapidly Rising income inequality and relative poverty and the factors behind.
A Focus on International Child Health and Child Well-being Supporting the Child Health Strategy through Improved Child Health Data and Intelligence ChiMat.
GFK-RusGeneral Online Research International ConferenceVienna. April Attitude of Russians towards family planning: comparison of general population.
PROVIDING INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY OF POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
The Promise and Pitfalls of the ‘Investment’ Approach to Welfare Presentation to “Investing in Australia’s Future”, Peter Whiteford, Crawford School of.
Interstate statistical committee
on Youth and Gender Statistics
Student loan as an instrument for students’ funding
Paternity leave with a leave benefit at a high level in Lithuania
U S A QUESTION 1-10 The number of people living in poverty in the United States decreased from 2009 to 2011.
Social Welfare Policymaking
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
High earning replacement in case of parental leave in Estonia
Legislative Policies on Women’s Political Participation
Sociology Demographics of Aging.
Social Welfare Policymaking
Social Welfare Policymaking
New focus of social services on family and working life reconciliation
Providing A Safety Net 3.4.
Social Welfare Policymaking
Social Welfare Policymaking
Social Welfare Policymaking
Housing Land Advocates– November 4, 2016
Social Welfare Policy Public Policy.
Economic life cycle in Sweden: 1980s, 1990s, & 2000s Daniel Hallberg Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm 1 Demographic background 2 Institutional.
The family in Norwegian society
Poverty and Inequality Statistics: Development of Methodology in the Russian Federation Geneva, 5-6 May 2015.
Chapter 12 Income Distribution, Poverty, and Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Child benefits policies: comparative analysis of Russian regions Anna Philippova, Marina Kolosnitsyna National Research University Higher School of Economics Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2017 www.hse.ru

Child benefit system in Russia Child benefits provided by the federal budget or Social Security Fund (prenatal and maternity benefits, lump-sum childbirth benefits and child care allowances for children under 1.5 years, etc.). All these benefits are categorical. Most of them are of insurance nature and targeted at families with children under 1.5 years. Child benefits provided by regional budgets (nursing benefits, etc.). Most of these benefits are means-tested. Regional authorities not only choose the recipients according to the families’ incomes, but also set the size of the benefits. photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

The aim of the research The aim of the research is to compare child benefits policies across the regions of Russia by estimating costs of child benefit packages for model families in various regions. photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Literature photo photo photo Bradshaw. The case for family benefits (2012). Bradshaw, Ditch, Holmes, Whiteford. A Comparative Study of Child Support in Fifteen Countries (1993). Bradshaw, Finch. A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries (2002). Kamerman, Kahn. Income transfers, work and the economic well-being of families with children: A comparative study (1982). Kamerman, Kahn. Income Transfers and Mother-Only Families in Eight Countries (1983). Kamerman, Phipps, Ben-Arieh. From Child Welfare to Child Well-Being: An International Perspective on Knowledge in the Service of Policy Making (2010). Ovcharova et al. Determinants of reproductive behaviours and factors of families ill-being: panel research results (Детерминанты репродуктивного поведения населения и факторы семейного неблагополучия: результаты панельных исследований) (2010). Ovcharova et al. Analysis of the situation of children in the Russian Federation: towards a society of equal opportunities. A joint report from the Independent Institute for Social Policy and UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). (Анализ положения детей в Российской Федерации: на пути к обществу равных возможностей. Совместный доклад Независимого института социальной политики и Детского фонда ООН (ЮНИСЕФ)) (2011). photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Methods Model families are common types of families analyzed in the context of their incomes and benefits receipt. Regional child benefit package includes all regular transfers from regional budgets targeted at families with children (except of lump-sum benefits which do not significantly affect family welfare). photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Data The study is based on data from the official web-sites of regional authorities and the Federal State Statistical Service (Rosstat), taking into consideration regional legislation. 4th quarter of 2015 – data on average monthly wages and subsistence minimums 2016-2017 – data on child benefits and prices photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Components of child benefit packages Child benefits in cash: nursing benefits (for families with children under 16 (18) years monthly payment for the third and subsequent children until the child reaches the age of 3 Child benefits in kind: free medicines free travel cards compensations for kindergarten photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Budget security classification (by Zubarevich and Gorina) Rich regions: 9 regions with highest level of budget security. They are the leading oil and gas producing regions and federal cities agglomerations. Responsible regions: 12 regions with medium and low level of budget security and transfers (except Sakha Republic). They have low debt level and deficit budgets. Middle regions: 33 regions with medium characteristics. Almost all of these regions have low level of budget security and high debt level. Default: 20 regions with low level of budget security, high level of debt load, medium or high budget deficit. Formally, default of Russian regions is impossible for political reasons. However, actual characteristics of these regions correspond with the situation of default. Heavily subsidized regions: 9 economically weak republics with high level of subsidies. Transfers from the federal budget are main driver of their economies. photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Average wage and subsistence minimum for children, in rubles, 2015 photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Birth rate (the number of births per thousand people), 2015 photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages We estimated child benefit packages for: family couples / single mothers families with one child / three children families with per capita income below subsistence minimum / equal to the subsistence minimum / equal to the average wage in region photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers with three children (aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor family couples with three children (aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (aged 7 and older), as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (aged 7 and older), as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Results Benefits in cash provide a larger share of all packages. Child benefit packages are positively connected to the level of budget security. Regions of Russia conduct pro-natal policy: regional packages for multi-child families are significantly greater than regional packages for families with one child. Packages for single mothers exceed packages for family couples. All packages are less than 35% of subsistence minimum for children (for packages for families with one child) or 80% of subsistence minimum for children (for packages for multi-child families). photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 101000 Tel.: +7 (495) 628-8829, Fax: +7 (495) 628-7931 www.hse.ru

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers with one child (aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor family couples with one child (aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with one child (aged 7 and older), as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with one child (aged 7 and older), as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers with one child (aged 2), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor family couples with one child (aged 2), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with one child (aged 2), as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with one child (aged 2), as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older), in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older), as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older), as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to subsistence minimum for children, as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to average wage in region, in rubles photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to average wage in region, as a share of subsistence minimum for children photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017

Child benefit packages for poor single mothers and family couples with three children (one aged 2 and two aged 7 and older) and per capita income equal to average wage in region, as a share of the average wage photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2017