Niagara River Area of Concern

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Restoration of Columbia River Floodplain Functions to Steigerwald Lake
Robert Weber PA Fish and Boat Commission Fisheries Biologist Fish Management Division.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Update on the Niagara River U.S. RAP Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Implementers Session April 10, 2013.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.
1 Aggregate Areas David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3,
ICMP Public Meeting February 18 th, 2011 February 18 th, 2011.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Columbia River Toxics Reduction Working Group 2012 Regional Roundtable: Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
Grand Calumet River/Indiana Harbor Canal Feasibility Study
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
 To conserve our remaining natural resources for future generations  To protect a valuable economic revenue stream  To organize management efforts.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Todd Ambs Water Division Administrator, WDNR October 26, 2009 Sustaining the Water Belt of North America.
Watershed-based Plan To Restore the Hackensack Meadowlands: The Meadowlands Comprehensive Restoration Implementation Plan Terry Doss and Karen Appell The.
Lake Huron Initiative: A Work in Process Presented by: Jim Bredin - Michigan Office of the Great Lakes.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Utah Lake Carp Removal Status Update Utah Chapter of American Fisheries Society: March 22, 2011 Michael Mills.
Current Great Lakes Toxic Prevention Programs Maumee Bay, OH February 22, 2005.
TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project Roane County, TN Project Update September, 2012 Neil Carriker.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Mississippi River Long Distance Sediment Pipeline Project Louisiana Office of Coastal Protection and Restoration Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority.
USGS Response to Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill USGS/NWS/COE Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting October 5-6, 2010 Brainerd, MN George Arcement, Jr. Louisiana.
Everglades Protection Area Tributary Basins February 28, 2006 Third Annual Public Meeting on Implementation Progress.
Project Update: Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site October 24, 2012 Mr. David King, PE – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Gary Klawinski – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Mark Surette.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Planning Habitat Restoration for Dredging Projects WEDA Midwest Chapter Conference Green Bay, Wisconsin April 27, 2012 Jack Brunner.
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Re-designating Beneficial Use Impairments in Great Lakes Areas of Concern COA Management Committee Meeting June 5, 2012 Agenda Item 4.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Mulberry River Watershed
Update of Transportation Priorities Plan
Technical Support to AOCs
New York State AOC Meeting:
Watershed-based Plan To Restore the Hackensack Meadowlands:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Expert Panel on Diversion Planning and Implementation: Meeting #3
Assessing PA’s Lake Erie Tributaries
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
Summarize Strategy The strategy is comprehensive. Covers:
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Portfolio Management Process & Customer Request Management
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Watershed-based Plan To Restore the Hackensack Meadowlands:
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Eric Ellis Habitat Restoration Senior Program Specialist
Northern Workgroup Update
Presentation transcript:

Niagara River Area of Concern Status Update November 3, 2016

Beneficial Use Impairments Current Target Removal Year 1 Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption 2022 3 Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations 4 Fish Tumors or Other Deformities Removed 5 Bird or Animal Deformities or Reproductive Problems 6 Degradation of Benthos 2021 7 Restrictions on Dredging Activities 2018 14 Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat

Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption BUI removal will be possible when upper Niagara River fish consumption advisories are identical to those for Lake Erie Periodic sampling and analysis of fish is needed Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization 2018 $550,000 Assessment of Contaminant Residues in Fish; USGS 2021

Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations Various studies and monitoring efforts are ongoing BUI removal will depend on implementation of habitat projects and continued reductions in contaminant levels Next steps may include consideration of changes to removal criteria, primarily the criterion calling for improving trends in the community structure of native mollusk populations Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization 2018 $100,000 Mollusk community structure study; lead to be determined

Bird or Animal Deformities or Reproductive Problems Recent data (mink study) indicates that this impairment continues to exist BUI removal will depend on continued reductions in contaminant levels Next steps may include comparing the contributions of AOC vs. non-AOC sources to levels of contaminants associated with deformities Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization 2020 $100,000 Re-evaluation of mink; NYSDEC

Summary of Fish and Wildlife Assessments Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization Related BUI 2018 $550,000 Assessment of Contaminant Residues in Fish; USGS Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption $100,000 Mollusk community structure study; lead to be determined Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations 2020 Re-evaluation of mink; NYSDEC Bird or Animal Deformities or Reproductive Problems 2021

Sediment – Recent Progress Sampling for the tributary screening assessment occurred in June USGS and NYSDEC report on toxicity of sediment in the AOC and tributaries. Sediment in Scajaquada and Two Mile Creeks showed toxicity. NYSDEC, EPA, USGS and USACE are working to develop a sediment evaluation strategy Updates are expected to removal criteria for sediment- related BUIs

Sediment – Next Steps In general, continue to advance sediment characterization and remediation. Complete the analysis of macroinvertebrate community data from the 2014 and 2015 sampling. NYSDEC will prepare a report on the sediment screening assessment in Niagara River tributaries. USACE may conduct probing this year to identify areas of soft sediment for later sampling. USACE may also collect surface sediment samples in limited areas as a pilot project to assist in developing a comprehensive sediment evaluation strategy.

Sediment – Funding Needs Funding of sediment evaluation is a high priority. Continuing funding is needed to meet target removal dates for multiple BUIs. Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization 2018 $1,500,000 Coordinated evaluation of sediment chemistry and benthos; USEPA/USACE/NYSDEC/USGS 2019 Coordinated evaluation of sediment chemistry and benthos (continued); USEPA/USACE/NYSDEC/USGS 2020

Habitat – Recent Progress Initial feasibility studies completed for seven potential Habitat Plan projects Six “no regrets” projects selected for the Habitat Plan – located around Grand Island, projects will protect and expand coastal wetland habitat EPA has funded designs for five of the six projects USACE is beginning initial feasibility studies for eight additional potential Habitat Plan projects

Habitat – Funding Needs Year funding will be requested Estimated amount of funding Project name and expected technical lead organization 2018 $1,500,000 Design of remaining Habitat Plan projects; lead to be determined $1,000,000 Spicer Creek construction; lead to be determined Grass Island construction; lead to be determined $3,500,000 Buckhorn Island State Park construction; lead to be determined 2018 or 2019 East River Marsh Extension construction; lead to be determined $1,100,000 Burnt Ship Creek construction; lead to be determined 2019 – 2020 $6,000,000 Construction of remaining Habitat Plan projects; lead to be determined