Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PARAMOUNT: phase III study of pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
Advertisements

Questions and answers about PARAMOUNT: phase III study of pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
1 Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Monotherapy Studies.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Altre evidenze con NAB-paclitaxel: carcinoma del polmone.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Outcomes for Elderly, Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel: Analysis.
1 LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27): Treatment-naïve Advanced NSCLC.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Phase II SAKK 35/10 Trial: Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Shows Durable Activity in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Phase II HALO-202: nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine ± PEGPH20 in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
PALOMA-2: Addition of Palbociclib to Frontline Letrozole Significantly Improves PFS in Postmenopausal ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer CCO Independent.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
GEM2005MAS65 Trial: Bortezomib-Based Maintenance Increases CR Rate and PFS in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Slideset on: Mateos.
KEYNOTE-086 (Cohort A): Phase II Evaluation of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic TNBC CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of.
LUX-Lung 6 clinical trial
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
TERAPIA SEQUENZIALE E/O DI MANTENIMENTO DOPO UNA PRIMA LINEA: ANCORA UN TRATTAMENTO SPERIMENTALE? Paolo Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica A.O. San Gerardo Monza.
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
STAMPEDE: Docetaxel Significantly Improves Survival in Men With Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Outcomes of patients in the North Trent region with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with maintenance pemetrexed following induction with platinum.
SQUIRE: Improved Survival With Necitumumab + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin vs Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Squamous NSCLC Slideset.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
SIRveNIB: Randomized Phase III Trial of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy vs Sorafenib in Locally Advanced HCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Improved Survival With Nivolumab vs Docetaxel in Pts With Advanced Squamous Cell NSCLC After Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy: CheckMate 017 Slideset on:
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Multiple Myeloma in Session 2015: An Online Journal Club for Hematology/Oncology Fellows This program is supported by educational grants from Celgene Corporation.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Abstract #LBA7511 Results of a Randomized, Phase III Trial of nab-Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Compared With Cremophor-based Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
The nab-Paclitaxel Difference
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a clinical experience Silvia Vecchiarelli Istituto di Ematologia e Oncologia “L.& A. Serágnoli”,
Nab-paclitaxel nel NSCLC avanzato
Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli
Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 51 5 ESA :33:17 PM 5 ESA :06:42.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Presentation transcript:

Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica Ospedale San Gerardo ASST Monza Roma 29/10/2017

nab® -paclitaxel is the first tumour-targeted nanomedicine to leverage the natural transport properties of albumin1 A single molecule of albumin can bind up to 6 or 7 molecules of paclitaxel6 nab® -paclitaxel individual molecule nab® -paclitaxel complex 4–14 nm in size3–5 Albumin Paclitaxel It is important to note the sizes of the nab®-paclitaxel complex (130 nm) and individual molecules (4–14 nm).1–4 Modelling and in vivo studies have shown that drug penetration by nanomedicines depends on the size of pores within vasculature.1 Tumour vasculature is leaky and contains large pores of heterogeneous size.1 Smaller nanomedicines demonstrate the most rapid penetration across a range of pore sizes.5 As such, the small size of individual nab®-paclitaxel molecules has the potential to facilitate effective drug delivery to tumours. References Kratz F, et al. J Control Release 2008;132:171–83. Desai N, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:1317–24. Abraxane [Summary of Product Characteristics]. EU: Celgene Corporation; 2013. Peters T, Jr. Adv Protein Chem 1985;37:161–245. Chauhan VP, et al. Nat Nanotechnol 2012;7:383–8. 130 nm in size1–3 Desai N. Drug Delivery Report 2007. Kratz F, et al. J Control Release 2008;132:171–83. Desai N, et al. Clin Can Res 2006;12:1317–24. Abraxane [Summary of Product Characteristics]. EU: Celgene Corporation; 2013. Peters T, Jr. Adv Protein Chem 1985;37:161–245. Paal K, et al. Eur J Biochem 2001;268:2187-–91. 2

Key milestones in the development of systemic chemotherapy for NSCLC FDA Approvals

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Study Design and Objectives Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC No prior therapy for metastatic disease ECOG PS 0-1 N = 1052 nab-Paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 (30-min infusion) Carboplatin AUC 6 d1 21-day cycles No premedication sb-Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 d1 (3-h infusion) Carboplatin AUC 6 d1 21-day cycles with premedication of dexamethasone + antihistamines Stratification factors: Stage (IIIb vs IV); age; (< 70 vs ≥ 70); sex; histology (adenocarcinoma vs squamous cell vs other); geographic region Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs sb-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced NSCLC Primary endpoint: ORR by independent radiological review (CR + PR) Secondary endpoints: PFS, OS, DCR (CR + PR + SD), and safety AUC, area under the curve; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; PS, performance status; sb, solvent-based; SD, stable disease. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 4

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Baseline Patient Demographics (cont’d) Characteristic nab-P/C (n = 521) sb-P/C (n = 531) Histology, n (%) Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Large cell carcinoma Other   254 (49) 229 (44) 9 (2) 29 (6) 264 (50) 221 (42) 13 (2) 33 (6) ECOG, n (%) 1 2 133 (26) 385 (74) 3 (< 1) 113 (21) 416 (78) 2 (< 1) Stage at randomization, n (%) Stage IIIB Stage IV 108 (21) 413 (79) 110 (21) 421 (79) Prior therapy, n (%) Radiation therapy Chemotherapy 39 (7) 14 (3) 50 (9) Smoking status, n (%) Never smoked Smoked and quit Smoked and still smokes 519a 137 (26) 168 (32) 214 (41) 526a 144 (27) 148 (28) 234 (44) a Few missing values. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 5

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Primary Endpoint: Objective Response – ITT CI, confidence interval; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 6

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Secondary Endpoint: OS (ITT) Reprinted with permission. © 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; OS, overall survival; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 7

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC OS by Stratification Factor Reprinted with permission. © 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 8

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Objective Response By Histology CI, confidence interval; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 9

CA031 (Socinski): Analysis of Elderly Patients With NSCLC in a Phase III Trial of nab-P/C vs sb-P/C Overall Survival In elderly patients, a significant improvement in median OS with nab-P/C vs sb-P/C was observed; no difference in median OS in patients < 70 years was observed HR, hazard ratio; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA, et al. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:314-321, by permission of the European Society for Medical Oncology. © 2013 European Society for Medical Oncology. 10

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Most Common Treatment-Related ≥ Grade 3 Hematologic Adverse Events nab-P/C n = 514 NCI CTCAE Grade 3 Grade 4 Hematologic AEs, % Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Anemia Febrile neutropenia 33 13 22 < 1 14 5 32 7 6 1 26 2 < 0.001a < 0.001b ns sb-P/C n = 524 a P < 0.05 in favor of nab-P/C b P < 0.05 in favor of sb-P/C Compared with sb-P/C, treatment with nab-P/C resulted in significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia An increased incidence of thrombocytopenia and anemia with the nab-P/C regimen was observed, and these toxicities were readily manageable Most anemia was corrected with a single blood transfusion; thrombocytopenia did not lead to increased rates of hemorrhage  AE, adverse event; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ns, not statistically significant; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 11

CA031: nab-P/C vs sb-P/C in NSCLC Most Common Treatment-Related ≥ Grade 3 Nonhematologic Adverse Events nab-P/C n = 514 NCI CTCAE Grade 3 Grade 4 Nonhematologic AEs, % Fatigue Sensory neuropathy Anorexia Nausea Myalgia Arthralgia 4 3 2 < 1 6 11 <1 ns < 0.001a = 0.011a = 0.008a sb-P/C n = 524 a P < 0.05 in favor of nab-P/C b P < 0.05 in favor of sb-P/C Median time to improvement of grade ≥ 3 sensory neuropathy to grade 1 (nab-P/C vs sb-P/C): 38 vs 104 days Sensory neuropathy (all grades) with nab-P/C vs sb-P/C: 46% vs 62%, P < 0.001 Significantly higher percentage of patients did not develop neuropathy with nab-P/C vs sb-P/C: 54% vs 38%, P < 0.001 AE, adverse event; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute -Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ns, not statistically significant; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; sb, solvent-based. Socinski MA et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2055-62. 12

Subanalysis in the Maintenance Setting of the Phase III CA031 Trial Objective and Patient Population Objective: This exploratory analysis examined outcomes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology receiving > 4 cycles of nab-P/C 229 patients with SCC NSCLC received nab-P/C in induction phase (first 4 cycles) 138 of 229 patients (60.3%) treated with nab-P/C were progression free at cycle 4 and entered cycle 5; median PFS and OS were evaluated for these patients and expressed from day 1 of cycle 5 NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; P/C, paclitaxel + carboplatin; PFS, progression-free survival. Socinski MA, et al. Oral presented at: IASLC 2013. [abstract 3438]. 13

nab-Paclitaxel + Carboplatin in Higher-Risk Pt Populations With Advanced NSCLC Elderly pts and pts with ECOG PS 2 have poorer prognosis than younger pts or those with better PS Both subgroups underrepresented in randomized clinical trials due to concerns about tolerability and comorbidities ABOUND.PS2 evaluated safety, efficacy of nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin followed by nab-paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive pts with advanced NSCLC and PS 2[1] ABOUND.70+ evaluated safety, efficacy of nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive pts aged 70 yrs or older with advanced NSCLC[2] ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PS, performance status. 1. Gajra A, et al. ASCO 2017. Abstract 9058. 2. Langer CJ, et al. ASCO 2017. Abstract 9059. 14