Imperial College London Assessment of Building Structures under Extreme Loading Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Finite Element Method CHAPTER 6: FEM FOR FRAMES
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Success with ModelSmart3D
Classification of Building Construction Types
Structural Analysis and Design of a Composite Steel/RC Multi-Storey Building United Arab Emirates University College of Engineering Department of Civil.
1 Alberto Montanari University of Bologna Basic Principles of Water Resources Management.
1 Challenge the future Subtitless On Lightweight Design of Submarine Pressure Hulls.
Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
Introduction to composite construction of buildings
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
FRAMEDSTRUCTURE Members: Soriana Álvarez #C Teresa Tam #C Ainara Ricchiutti #C
Basic structural theory. Statics Things dont continue to move if forces are resisted – Static Equilibrium What resists the force? Equal and opposite Reaction.
Structural Systems Analysis for Robustness Assessment
A Comparison of Numerical Methods to Predict the Progressive Collapse of Lightweight Aluminium Vessels Simon Benson, Jonathan Downes, Robert S. Dow Newcastle.
Simulation of Nonstructural Components
ABC Technology Project
Forces in Beams and Cables
ROTATION CAPACITY OF SEMI RIGID CONNECTIONS
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
THE USE OF YIELD LINE ANALYSIS AND PANEL TESTS FOR THE DESIGN OF SHOTCRETE  by  WC JOUGHIN* and GC HOWELL** SRK Consulting, Johannesburg * Principal.
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
The Fourteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing 3-6 September 2013 Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy Enhanced.
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Robustness assessment for multiple column loss scenarios
B.A. Izzuddin, L. Macorini and G. Rinaldin
XI International Conference on COMPUTATIONAL PLASTICITY FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS COMPLAS XI 7-9 September 2011 Barcelona - Spain Multiscale Modelling.
Parallelisation of Nonlinear Structural Analysis using Dual Partition Super-Elements G.A. Jokhio and B.A. Izzuddin.
Workshop at Indian Institute of Science 9-13 August, 2010 Bangalore India Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire Organisers:CS Manohar and Ananth.
Imperial College London First-Order Robustness, Higher-Order Mechanics Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC) Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de.
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
PREVENTING PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS Yahia Tokal Civil Engineering Seminar, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, Michigan.
Load Resistance – The Structural Properties of Materials Chapter 4.
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 3704 Statistical and Numerical Analysis 1 Group Project #2 Energy Dissipation Capacity.
Response of Masonry Cavity Cladding under Blast Loading J. Gu, L. Macorini, B. A. Izzuddin Computational Structural Mechanics Group Civil and Environmental.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Bassam A. Izzuddin Computational Structural Mechanics Group
CE 808: Structural Fire Engineering SAFIR - Computer Program
Presentation transcript:

Imperial College London Assessment of Building Structures under Extreme Loading Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

Buildings under Extreme Loading Modelling capabilities Progressive collapse Ongoing research 2 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Computational Structural Mechanics Group –2 academic staff (Izzuddin, Macorini) –2 RA’s, 8 PhD students – Focus on structures subject to extreme loading –Developments in computational mechanics –Applied structural engineering research –Novel modelling solutions for engineering practice Development of advanced program ADAPTIC 3 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Advanced structural analysis program developed at Imperial College over past 20 years Blast, fire, earthquake and extreme static loading Steel, reinforced concrete and composite structures Whole building response: frame, slabs, walls, connections,… Geometric and material nonlinearity Robust and efficient solution procedures Modelling of large scale structures using HPC 4 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting Modelling Capabilities ADAPTIC

Modelling Capabilities Simplified Methods Framework for progressive collapse assessment Steel beams subject to fire and blast loading Steel/composite beams with partial strength connections Membrane action in slabs Influence of material rate sensitivity 5 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Integrated Building Response Frame/slab substructure under sudden column loss 6 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Integrated Building Response Composite (ribbed) floor slab system under fire 7 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Connection Failure Detailed connection models with/without rate effect 8 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Slab failure Mechanics-based models for slabs subject to membrane action and reinforcement rupture 9 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Modelling Capabilities Masonry Structures Multi-scale modelling of masonry structures under extreme loading 10 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting FE modelling 3D Mesoscale model Material model Wpl1

Modelling Capabilities Partitioned Modelling on HPC Hierarchic partitioned approach for targeted model refinement and parallelisation on HPC 11 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Progressive Collapse Assessment Design-Oriented Framework Robustness limit state –Prevention of collapse of upper floors –Stretching design envelope from strength to ductility limit Two stages of assessment –Nonlinear static response accounting for ductility limit –Simplified dynamic assessment 12 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Progressive Collapse Assessment Design-Oriented Framework Maximum gravity load sustained under sudden column loss Multi-level framework Reduced model where deformation is concentrated Columns can resist re-distributed load Floors identical in components and loading Planar effects are neglected 13 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Progressive Collapse Assessment Nonlinear Static Response Sudden column loss similar to sudden application of gravity load to structure without column –Maximum dynamic response can be approximated using amplified static loading ( d P ) 14 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting Need models beyond conventional strength limit, including hardening, tensile catenary and compressive arching actions

Based on conservation of energy Work done by suddenly applied load equal to internal energy stored Leads to maximum dynamic displacement (also to load dynamic amplification) Definition of “pseudo-static” response Progressive Collapse Assessment Simplified Dynamic Approach 15 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Ongoing Research Projects Robustness of composite buildings under localised fire (EU project: Liege, Imperial, Coimbra, …) Influence of material rate sensitivity on building robustness (Imperial, Trento) Keeping our structures standing and our people alive – The next 25 years (DHS project: Texas, Imperial, PEC, WPM) 16 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Ongoing Research Projects DHS Project Testing of 3D floor systems to failure under column loss 17 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting

Ongoing Research Projects DHS Project Sudden column loss vs blast damage –Column loss is an upper bound thus useful for design 18 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting Sudden column loss

Ongoing Research Projects DHS Project Significance of uplift under external blast 19 6 January 2011 GEMS 2011 Meeting