SPIRIT IV 2 Year Results and The SPIRIT Women Clinical Trial

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Advertisements

2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Background & Study Design
The OPTIMAX first-in-man study Mid-term clinical outcome of Titanium-Nitride-Oxide-coated Cobalt Chromium stents in patients with de novo coronary artery.
Disrupt CAD Study Design
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
The Abbott Vascular DES Pipeline
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
A Novel Abluminal Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent as a Treatment Option for Diabetic Patients: Results from an All-Comers Multi-center Study: the En-ABL.
­ Up date on the Absorb Extend Trial
Washington Hospital Center, Division of Cardiology
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Novolimus Elution from a Biodegradable Polymer Coated Coronary Stent
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
REALITY: 8 month results
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
for the SPIRIT IV Investigators
Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher to rEduce Late Loss in stENT
on behalf of the International e-Cypher Investigators
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Raimund Erbel
Large-Scale Registry Examining Safety and Effectiveness of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Western.
Impact of Platelet Reactivity Following Clopidogrel Administration
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
Potential conflicts of interest
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
for the SPIRIT IV Investigators
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
DEScover: One-Year Clinical Results
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Presentation transcript:

SPIRIT IV 2 Year Results and The SPIRIT Women Clinical Trial One Year Clinical Follow-up Alexandra Lansky, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Yale University School of Medicine On Behalf of the SPIRIT Women Investigators

Alexandra J. Lansky, MD I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.

Fluorinated Copolymer XIENCE V: Design Components MULTI-LINK VISION Cobalt Chromium Stent MULTI-LINK VISION Stent Delivery System Drug Everolimus Drug Matrix Fluorinated Copolymer

Safety and Performance Post CE Mark Approval International XIENCE V Clinical Trials 2 year F/U Registry Enrollment Complete Enrollment Complete Enrollment Complete 5 year F/U 3 year F/U 3 year F/U 1 year F/U SPIRIT II SPIRIT III SPIRIT IV SPIRIT V XIENCE V USA XIENCE V India SPIRIT FIRST SPIRIT WOMEN Safety and Performance Europe N=60 Clinical Support for CE Launch International N=300 U.S. and Japan Approval U.S.: 65 sites Japan: 12 sites N=1380 (1,292/88) U.S. Continued Access Expanded Enrollment: N=3,690 Post CE Mark Approval International N=3,000 100 sites Registry N=2,700 Diabetic study N=325 Post CE Mark Approval International N=2,000 100 sites Single Arm Study N=1600 Randomized Sub Study N=454 U.S. Post Approval N=8000 India Post Approval N=1000 Anticipated Total # Patients = 18,000

Enrolled (N = 3,690) at 66 US sites SPIRIT IV TAXUS (N = 1,229) XIENCE V (N = 2,458) RVD: 2.5 – 3.75 mm LL: ≤ 28 mm Enrolled (N = 3,690) at 66 US sites Up to three de novo lesions, maximum of two lesions per epicardial vessel Randomized (N = 3,687)* Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10 Prospective, single-blind, active-controlled, randomized trial in 3,687 pts Clinical follow-up up to 5 years in all patients Primary endpoint: Target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year Major secondary endpoints: Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year; composite of cardiac death or target vessel myocardial infarction at 1 year All endpoints powered for sequential noninferiority and superiority testing

SPIRIT IV − Gender Subgroup Randomized (N=3,687) XIENCE V (N=2,458) TAXUS (N=1,229) Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10 Women (N=1,188) 32% Men (N=2,499) 68% XIENCE V (N=792) TAXUS (N=396) XIENCE V (N=1,666) TAXUS (N=833)

SPIRIT IV − Gender Subgroup: Baseline Demographics Women (N=1,188) Men (N=2,499) XIENCE V N=792 TAXUS N=396 P value N=1,666 N=833 Age (in years) 65 ± 11 66 ± 10 0.10 62 ± 10 0.40 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 31 ± 7 0.91 30 ± 5 31 ± 6 0.11 Hypertension (%) 80.7 81.1 0.94 75.8 73.8 0.28 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 35.4 38.2 0.34 30.4 29.8 0.75 Current Smoker (%) 22.3 20.7 0.60 21.7 23.2 0.38 Prior MI (%) 16.5 12.9 0.12 23.3 1.00 Unstable Angina (%) 32.1 28.2 0.18 25.6 29.2 0.06 Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10 N = Number of patients

SPIRIT IV − Gender Subgroup: Baseline Lesion Characteristics Women (NL=1,456) Men (NL=3,271) XIENCE V NL=972 TAXUS NL=484 P value NL=2,170 NL=1,101 Lesion Location LAD (%) 42 41 0.74 40 39 0.82 LCX (%) 21 22 0.68 26 27 0.40 RCA (%) 37 0.95 35 34 0.61 LMCA (%) NA QCA RVD (mm) 2.67 ± 0.45 2.67 ± 0.44 0.96 2.78 ± 0.49 2.79 ± 0.47 0.52 MLD (mm) 0.76 ± 0.37 0.77 ± 0.38 0.57 0.74 ± 0.38 0.75 ± 0.39 0.46 % DS 71 ± 12 71 ± 13 0.42 73 ± 13 0.67 Lesion Length (mm) 14 ± 6 14 ± 7 0.54 15 ± 7 0.34 Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10 NL = Number of lesions

SPIRIT IV − Gender Subgroup: Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Women (N=1,188) Men (N=2,499) XIENCE V N=792 TAXUS N=396 P value XIENCE V N=1,666 TAXUS N=833 TLF (%)* 6.9 10.8 0.03 7.3 9.6 0.048 Cardiac Death (%)** 0.9 1.8 0.25 1.0 0.83 Target Vessel MI (%)** 2.4 3.9 0.14 2.3 3.3 0.18 Ischemia-driven TLR (%)** 4.1 0.02 4.9 6.7 0.09 MACE (%)* 7.1 11.3 7.5 0.08 Stent thrombosis (ARC def/prob) (%) 0.26 1.57 0.49 1.12 0.12 Bleeding complications (%) 6.1 0.37 3.7 3.0 0.48 Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10 TLF = cardiac death, target vessel MI, and ischemia-driven TLR; MACE = cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR; *Hierarchical subject count; **Non-hierarchical subject count.

Pinteraction (Women vs. Men) = 0.24 SPIRIT IV − Women Subgroup: Stent Thrombosis (ARC Definition)* at 2 Years Acute (0 – 24 hours) Subacute (>24 hours – 30 days) Late (>30 days – 2 years)** XIENCE V N=792 0.26% p=0.02 Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10, table 19.2 TAXUS N=396 1.57% Stent Thrombosis (%) Pinteraction (Women vs. Men) = 0.24 *Definite or Probable per ARC definition; **Categorical data, 730 ± 28 days

Pinteraction (Women vs. Men) = 0.24 SPIRIT IV − Men Subgroup: Stent Thrombosis (ARC Definition)* at 2 Years Acute (0 – 24 hours) Subacute (>24 hours – 30 days) Late (>30 days – 2 years)** XIENCE V N=1,665 0.49% p=0.12 Qced by Guoping Su, 2/8/10, table 19.3 TAXUS N=833 1.12% Stent Thrombosis (%) Pinteraction (Women vs. Men) = 0.24 *Definite or Probable per ARC definition; **Categorical data, 730 ± 28 days

PURPOSE and METHODS The SPIRIT Women Study provides an evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent (EES) in the female population undergoing stent implantation*. SPIRIT Women is a prospective, open-label, single arm, all-comer multi-center study conducted at 73 sites outside of the United States. 1572 female patients were enrolled between July 2007 and March 2009. Maximum of 4 planned XIENCE V EESCC, Target lesions must be de novo Reference diameter between 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm Lesion length ≤ 28 mm. SPIRIT Women is the first major interventional trial with drug eluting stents to focus on women and specific aspects of their health in relation to CAD

SPIRIT WOMEN Global Site Distribution Hungary (2) Israel (1) Italy (12) Latvia (1) Netherlands (5) Norway (2) Poland (2) Austria (3) Belgium (3) Denmark (1) France (8) Germany (15) Portugal (4) South Africa (2) Spain (5) Switzerland (3) UK (4) Australia (2) Hong Kong (4) India (6) Malaysia (1) China (6) Argentina (2) Brazil (4) Venezuela (1)

STUDY DESIGN SPIRIT WOMEN RCT N  450 2 : 1 XIENCE V N = 300 Prospective, double arm, multi-centre study performed in parallel with a prospective, single arm study CYPHER Select Plus™* N = 150 SPIRIT WOMEN SAS N  1600 Primary endpoint: In-stent late loss at 270 days Primary endpoint: Composite endpoint at 1 year (All death, MI, TVR) PI: Marie-Claude Morice, MD, Massy, France Co-PI: Dr Stephan Windecker, MD, Bern, Switzerland Steering Committee: MG Modena, Modena, Italy, G Mikhail, London, UK, F Mauri, Barcelona, Spain, R Strasser, Dresden, Germany, L Grinfeld, Buenos Aires, Argentina Angiographic Core Lab: BioClinica, Leiden, The Netherlands All Events adjudicated by an independent CEC to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) Definitions CEC: K Koch, A Hoye, C Hanet, D McClean, E McFadden, V Umans, P Agostoni DSMB: J Tijssen, W Wijns, P Urban, K Fox Sponsor: Abbott Vascular SAS Enrollment Complete: 27 March 2009 * Cypher Select Plus Coronary Stent System is a registered trademark of Cordis or its affiliates.

CLINICAL STUDY POPULATION Intent to Treat Baseline and 30 Days 5: Informed Consent Withdrawn 6: Lost to Follow-up 1: Missed Visit N = 1560 240 Days A high 98% of patients returned for 1 year follow-up 3: Informed Consent Withdrawn 4: Lost to Follow-up 3: Missed Visit N = 1550 1-Year Clinical Follow-up 99% at 1 Year

BASELINE DEMOGRAPHICS Age 67 Years Prior MI 26% Unstable Angina 37% Multi Vessel Disease 36% Prior Cardiac Intervention 17% Braunwald Class lll 16% ‘Real World’ N=1572 Diabetes 34% Current Smoker 14% Hypertension 78% IDDM 11% Hypercholesterolemia 64% Family History CAD 36% Prior Oophorectomy 9% Prior Hysterectomy 20% General Obesity 27% Central Obesity* 71% Post Menopausal 94% *Waist circumference >88 cm

BASELINE LESION CHARACTERISTICS* Left Main 1% Mean Lesion Length 15mm RVD ≤2.75mm 47% Lesion length ≥20mm 29% Mean % DS 83% Mean RVD 2.9mm ‘Real World’ NL=2250 Lesions Thrombus 6% All lesion characteristics were visually assessed by the investigator. 47% of patients had a RVD <= 2.74. 72% of patients had type B2 or C lesions and moderate to severe calcium was present in 30% of lesions. The mean lesion length was 15mm and 29% of lesions were >=20mm. Eccentric 44% Moderate or Severe Calcium 30% Lesion Angulation >45º 23% >1 Target Lesion 32% Target Lesions Treated/Patient 1.4 ACC Lesion B2 or C 72% *Visually assessed by Investigator

PRIMARY ENDPOINT RESULTS* 1 YEAR ARC DEFINED PRIMARY ENDPOINT RESULTS* All Death, MI and TVR % 6 9 12 15 3 XIENCE V 37 393 Days Post Index Procedure 7,8% 12% The 12% composite endpoint rate was mainly driven by the high MI rate of 9%. Out of 139 MI events, 110 were peri-procedural MI events. *Previous MI rates in SPIRIT III and SPIRIT IV were adjudicated using historical WHO definition. Events in SPIRIT Women were adjudicated according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) Definitions (Peri-procedural MI=Troponin >3 times ULN)

1 YEAR ARC DEFINED CLINICAL RESULTS Non-Hierarchical N=1550 All Death (%) Cardiac Death 1.6 0.8 All ARC Defined MI* (%) ARC Defined Peri-procedural MI ARC Defined TV MI** 9.2 7.1# 8.7 ARC Defined Q-Wave TV MI 0.1 ARC Defined Non Q-Wave TV MI 8.6 TLR (%) 2.4 by PCI 2.1 by CABG 0.3 TVR including TLR (%) 3.0 2.7 Low rates of TLR and TVR for this complex patient and lesion population. #111 out of 1572 patients (7.1%) had an ARC Defined Peri-procedural MI All revascularizations are considered clinically indicated

1 YEAR ARC DEFINED STENT THROMBOSIS *90% of patients on Clopidogrel and 96% on Aspirin at 1 year follow-up No subacute definite stent thromboses occurred

CONCLUSIONS Results of the SPIRIT IV trial at 2 years demonstrated that women treated with XIENCE V EES had sustained superior safety and effectiveness with an 83% RRR in stent thrombosis compared to the Taxus stent SPIRIT Women is the first prospective post-market study in an exclusively female “all comers” population evaluating high risk women XIENCE V® has proven safe and effective with low rates of Target Lesion Revascularization (2.4%) and Stent Thrombosis (0.59%) despite the complexity of the population