Biological Effects of Radiation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Safety Course: Biological Effects
Advertisements

7. RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Tenth lecture Last lecture.
DNA What are your chances?. DNA Damage Inactive section of DNA strand Gene damage which is reparable Gene damage causing malignancy Gene damage causing.
A Nuclear Power Plant. Fallout from Chernobyl The question that all countries asked in 1986, and continue to ask to this day: Could it happen here?
Module 4 Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Radiation Carcinogenesis Martin Brown. Two types of late effects of irradiation Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects –Severity increases with dose.
Studies of impact of ionizing radiation on the human body - Hiroshima - US-Japanese teams medical tests, autopsies, human organ analysis, on-site radioactivity.
Essentials of Environmental Health PH 203 Dr. Khaled El-Ezaby
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Stochastic Somatic Effects Radiation induction of cancer Lecture IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation.
Health Effects of Radiation
“DOSIMETRY” Measuring Radiation National 5. Why should we measure radiation?
Dose, Biological Effects, and Exposure Models
Radon Overview Introduction: Radon and Radon Exposure Health Effects.
Section 3 Nuclear Changes Section 3: Nuclear Radiation Today Preview Key Ideas Bellringer Where is Radiation? Beneficial Uses of Nuclear Radiation Risks.
The Effects of Radiation on Living Things Health Physics.
Section 3 Nuclear Changes Where is Radiation? 〉 We are continually exposed to radiation from natural sources, such as the sun, soil, rocks, and plants.
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
“The World We Create” NATS 101 Section 6 Don’t forget to turn in your homework! 02/02.
Health Effects of Radiation. What Radiation Affects Directly or indirectly, radiation affects the DNA in cells DNA controls the cell’s function and ability.
1 Module 2 Health and Medical Effects. 2 Health and Medical Effects Terminal Objective: DESCRIBE the indicators, signs, and symptoms of exposure to radiation.
International Atomic Energy Agency Miranda Melhado and Daniel Schwapp.
Radiation Health Effects
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Dr. Antone Brooks Washington State University Tri-cities Richland, Washington Linear-No-Threshold Hypothesis- Scientific Evidence?
The Effects of Radiation
Section 1Nuclear Changes Section 1: What is Radioactivity?
1 Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation 9.1 Natural Radioactivity Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Deterministic effects
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Nuclear Fusion. Fusion ~The joining of nuclei to make larger atoms The Sun produces energy in this manner. Hydrogen bombs use this process. Much more.
TOPIC: Benefits & Dangers of: Radioisotopes Do Now: Draw Bohrs Model for the Cl-35 isotope.
Dangers of Nuclear Power and Radiation. Cells are undamaged. Cells are damaged, repair damage and…. operate abnormally (cancer). Cells die as a result.
The Price and Promise of Nuclear Science Nuclear radiation has it’s good points and it’s bad points.
Absorbed dose of radiation and its biological influence
5.3 Radiation Measurement
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
The accidents at Fukushima Dai-Ichi Summary of Health Discussions
Nuclear Fusion.
L 38 Modern Physics [3] Nuclear physics  Nuclear energy
Benefits & Dangers of Radioisotopes
Quantification of Radiation
IONIZING RADIATION ….. a discussion of the health hazards associated with handling and use of materials capable of producing ionization of matter.
Electromagnetic Radiation
Radiation Dose.
Genetic Susceptibility
BEIR VII: Update on the risks of “low-level” radiation
Background Radiation.
For healthcare professionals
Benefits & Dangers of: Radioisotopes
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
What does the nuclear scientist do in his spare time?
Nuclear Chemistry Lesson 2.
Benefits & Dangers of: Radioisotopes
Benefits & Dangers of: Radioisotopes
Health Effects of Radiation
Nuclear Fusion.
Nuclear Energy.
Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation
Health and Biological Effects of Radiation
Write down the things in green in your notebook!!!
Health and Biological Effects of Radiation
Is nuclear energy a good idea or not?
RADIATION AND HALF-LIFE
Radioactive Decay & Half-life.
Nuclear Chemistry Lesson 2.
Radiation.
Presentation transcript:

Biological Effects of Radiation. Because the many of the problems associated with nuclear power plants are associated with the biological effects of nuclear radiation, we will reverse the order and discuss biological effects first. It is known that the biological effects of exposure to radioactive materials can be serious, but in many cases the mechanisms of damage are not understood at the atomic level so we need to use information from biological experiments.

Units. Unfortunately many units are used to Describe radiation exposure: Energy exposure: 1 rad = 10-5 joules in 1 gram of tissue Quality factor: Takes account of the fact that Different kinds of radiation have different Biological effects 1 rem = (Quality factor)x 1 rad

Table 15-1, p. 505

Table 15-2, p. 506

Lethal Dose 50% Animals (including humans) exposed to intense radiation become ill and die of various diseases, mainly cancers. The deaths may occur quickly or over many decades and the responses are not the same for all individuals. The mechanisms of damage are not well understood and the available information is from data from experiments. The data can be arranged in a dose-response curve as shown on the next slide Note that what matters biologically is the total dose to the organism and not the rate of exposure.

The dose at which 50% die is called the lethal-dose 50 Figure 15.2: Dose-effect distribution curve for mice. The point at which 50% of the population dies is called the lethal dose-50, or LD-50. It is about 1000 rads in this example. Fig. 15-2, p. 507

Unfortunately we do have such data for humans as a result of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. By following the histories of 24,000 people exposed to intense radiation in those events, data including that displayed in the following graph was obtained.

Figure 15.3: Leukemia mortality dose-response curves for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Fig. 15-3, p. 508

Note that the numbers are per million person years. This data implies roughly 2 cases per rem of radiation per million people per year for leukemia. There is debate concerning whether such high dose data can be extrapolated to determine risks at low doses, but most scientists believe that it can.

If there are 1200 leukemia deaths per million person years at a dose of 250 rads, what are your chances of getting leukemia from the background radiation of 360 millirads per year in a lifetime of 70 years? (assuming quality factor =1) A. 1 in 1200x106 B. 1 in 1200x(.360/(250x70))x106 C. 1 in 250 x 106/(1200x70x0.360) D. 1 in (1200x70 x.360)/(250 x 106) E. 1 in 1200x250x106/(70 x.360)

Answer C: Number of deaths per person year per Rad = 1200/(106 x250) Exposure of one person in 70 years = 1x70x.360 rads Number of deaths expected is the product = 1200/(250x106) deaths per person per rad per year x 1 person x 70 years x .360 rads Or one death for every ((250x106)/(1200x70 x.360) about 8200 people

Actual leukemia death rates are around 1 for every 10,000 people per lifetime. So the exercise gave an answer close to what is observed. However that is somewhat surprising. The curve is S-shaped, so the death rate would be expected to be much lower at low doses. This suggests that other origins of leukemia may be important.

Background radiation: In evaluating the risk of nuclear power plants it is necessary to take into account that humans are exposed to significant nuclear radiation in the absence of power plants or nuclear weapons. A summary appears on the next slide.

Table 15-5, p. 514

These radiation exposures do have health effects. Unless nuclear power significantly increases this exposure it would be rational to worry first about the other exposures. These include particularly radon. Measures you can take to protect yourself against excessive radon exposure are discussed in your book. Current national standards limit radiation exposure above background to 100mrem/yr

Table 15-3, p. 508

From these tables, what kinds of health effects can be expected from the average background exposure during a 70 year human life? (Assume QF=1.) A. None B. blood changes. C. injury and disability D. between B. and C. E. between A. and B. Table 15-3, p. 508

Answer: D. between B and C 360 mrem/yr x(1/1000 rem/mrem) x (1/QF (rad/rem)) X70 yr = 25.2 rad Some effects!

Decay of Radon, naturally occurring in common rocks Figure 15.4: Dose-response curves for low doses of radiation are based on the assumption of a linear response—that is, that the data from high doses (solid curve) can be extrapolated back to low doses (as in curve a). No threshold exists (as is assumed for curve b), so that any radiation is assumed to have a harmful effect. Fig. 15-5, p. 510

Medical Procedure exposures Table 15-4, p. 514

Figure 15.7: Key to major radon entry routes. Fig. 15-7, p. 512

Figure 15.6: Comparable risks from exposure to radon gas. Fig. 15-6, p. 511

Somatic and genetic damage: The biological effects discussed so far are to the individual irradiated (somatic) There are also effects on the descendants of the irradiated individuals through damage to the DNA molecules which carry genetic information. Such mutations are known to be a major source of the variation which, together with natural selection, drives biological evolution. They occur naturally, driven by the background radiation. However most mutations fail (do not produce improvements in survivability) and too many mutations will threaten the survivability of a species.

Exposures from various other hazards above ‘background’ Proposed standard for the Yucca Mountain high level waste storage site: 15mrem/yr for 10,000 years (may not be achievable) Normal nuclear reactor operation for electric power production: 170 mrem/yr (federal limit) Chernobyl (worst nuclear power accident until Fukushima) 200 mSv= .2 x100 rem/SV x 1000mrem/rem = 20,000mrem Nuclear bomb: Exposures and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were (for survivors) from 100-500 rads= 100,000-500,000 mrem ( if QF=1 bone marrow only)

Summary and conclusions: Radiation from radioactive (decaying) nuclei has mainly deleterious effects on biological organisms including humans. Humans are all exposed to substantial, naturally occuring radiation, most significantly from radon. Much the biggest biological threat to human health from nuclear radiation arising from human activity is from nuclear weapons, if they are ever used again. The other dangers are from nuclear power plant accidents and extremely long term storage of nuclear waste. The federal limit on exposure from normally operating nuclear power plants Is about 20% above normal background.