Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Dump-sample collection sequence illustration

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Main-period ensemble-averaged AHRR profiles for a cycle-of-interest (−65 CANVO SOI; 400 J/cycle) along with preconditioning and target-cycle preconditioning profiles

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: GC speciation results (left) broken down into surrogate fuel components, H2, and by carbon number as a fraction of NVO injection fuel energy for SOI = −65, −40, and −10 CANVO. The NVO-period AHR is also shown (right).

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Main-period ensemble-averaged AHRR profiles for a sweep of NVO SOI with fixed NVO injection rates (265 J) and the engine fueled by RD587 gasoline (dashed) or the surrogate (solid)

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: ITE (top), CoV of IMEP (middle), and main-period CA10 (bottom) as a function of total cycle fuel energy and NVO SOI for the RD587 gasoline with NVO injected fuel energy fixed at 265 J

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: ITE (top), CoV of IMEP (middle), and main-period CA10 (bottom) as a function of total cycle fuel energy and NVO SOI for the RD587 surrogate with NVO injected fuel energy fixed at 265 J

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Main-period CA10 for the RD587 gasoline (open symbols) and surrogate (filled symbols) as a function of NVO SOI for 400 J (triangles) and 600 J (squares) total injected fuel quantities

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Main-period ensemble-averaged AHRR profiles for a sweep of NVO injection rates with fixed SOI (−40 CANVO) and the engine fueled by RD587 gasoline (dashed) or the surrogate (solid)

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: ITE (top), CoV of IMEP (middle), and main-period CA10 (bottom) as a function of the total cycle and NVO fuel injected for the RD587 gasoline with NVO SOI = −40 CANVO

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: ITE (top), CoV of IMEP (middle), and main-period CA10 (bottom) as a function of the total cycle and NVO fuel injected for the RD587 surrogate with NVO SOI = −40 CANVO

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Main-period CA10 for the RD587 gasoline (open symbols) and surrogate (filled symbols) as a function of NVO injected fuel energy for 400 J (circles) and 600 J (diamonds) total injected fuel quantities

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Auto-ignition delay time for mixtures of reformate and parent fuel at 850 K, 15 bar (solid lines, left y-axis) and 950 K, 22 bar (dashed lines, right y-axis)

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: Estimated temperature at −20 CA and γ during compression for the RD587 surrogate and PIMS-measured reformate

Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tailoring Charge Reactivity Using In-Cylinder Generated Reformate for Gasoline Compression Ignition Strategies J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139(12):122801-122801-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037207 Figure Legend: tign at 15 bar for the RD587 surrogate and PIMS-measured reformate for 400, 600, and 700 J of total fuel energy using the GC-measured oxidizer stream (9.5% O2, 4.8% CO2, 4.9% H2O, and 80.8% N2)