Recent FDA Announcements – Agricultural Water

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
Advertisements

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Overview of Significant Issues and Identified Alternatives for Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Produce Safety Rule Michael Mahovic, Ph.D. Produce.
Environmental Management System Bruce Barnard Terry Parish Teresa Woodley.
MFRPS 10 Laboratory Support: Relationship to the Sampling Agreement Requirement Steven M. Sobek Director - Bureau of Laboratory Services State of Wisconsin.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
KAPPA OIL SERVICES 1 VII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NEFTEGAZSTANDARDT September 2012 St. PETERSBURG Alain LOPPINET.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Preventive Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Environmental Management System (EMS) Awareness Training.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Environmental Management System Definitions
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
The Culture of Healthcare Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security Lecture d This material (Comp2_Unit9d) was developed by Oregon Health and Science University,
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Using the FRP to Enhance Georgia’s Leadership Program May 9, 2006 Stephanie Busch P 2 AD.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Training Update: FSMA Preventive Controls & MFRP Training
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Meeting Today’s Food Safety Challenges at the National Institute of Food and Agriculture An Overview of Food Safety Programs Jan Singleton, PhD, RDN Director,
Final Rule on Produce Safety
The Method Update Rule Does this affect me? HOW?
GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment On Social Practice – GRASP
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Nega Beru, Ph. D. Director, Office of Food Safety
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
What we all need to know about the powers that be!
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
FHWA Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
Recent FDA Announcements – Agricultural Water
CS 790M Project preparation (I)
Local Government Climate Change Support Program 2016
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
Recent FDA Announcements – Agricultural Water
Informed Consent (SBER)
Information to Share with Laboratories: FSMA Produce Safety Rule Water Quality Testing Requirements for Farms Excerpted and adapted from a webinar the.
The Process for Final Approval: Ongoing Monitoring
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Safety Self-Inspections
Recent FDA Announcements – Agricultural Water
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
CS 426 CS 791z Topics on Software Engineering
CS 426 CS 791z Topics on Software Engineering
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Presentation transcript:

Recent FDA Announcements – Agricultural Water The following two supplemental slides were developed to address recent FDA announcements on the FSMA Produce Safety Rule. These announcements include: Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for Subpart E Equivalent Testing Methodologies for Agricultural Water FDA Considering Simplifying Agricultural Water Standards   The first announcement is a Proposed Rule extending the water quality compliance dates, and the second is a FDA factsheet listing equivalent water testing methodologies. The third announcement states that FDA intends to simplify the microbial quality and testing requirements for agricultural water established by the FSMA Produce Safety Rule. Many collaborators have asked PSA how to integrate the above announcements into the PSA Grower Training Curriculum. The PSA strongly recommends incorporating the following slides into the PSA Grower Training Curriculum. Additional details on the announcements and suggestions for delivering the supplemental information can be found in the slide notes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Version: 12-7-17

Water Related Compliance Dates SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL FDA Proposed Rule: Water Compliance Dates Business Size Compliance Dates For Most Produce Proposed Water Related Compliance Dates All other businesses (>$500K) 1/26/18 1/26/22 Small businesses (>$250K-500K) 1/28/19 1/26/23 Very small businesses (>$25K-250K) 1/27/20 1/26/24 Note: For use in Module 1, after the slide titled Produce Safety Rule Compliance. In September 2017, FDA published a Proposed Rule called Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for Subpart E. If implemented, this Rule would modify the implementation of certain aspects of the agricultural water requirements The new compliance dates would include ALL provisions of Subpart E (Agricultural water) including the safe and sanitary quality requirement, the annual inspection requirement, and the postharvest water monitoring requirements The reason given for this extension is to “to address questions about the practical implementation of compliance with certain provisions and to consider how we might further reduce the regulatory burden or increase flexibility while continuing to achieve our regulatory objectives, in keeping with the Administration's policies.” Trainers and participants should be aware of this proposed rule and the intent to reduce the regulatory burden and increase flexibility within the agricultural water requirements of the FSMA Produce Safety Rule. Until this and other processes are complete, the materials in Modules 5.1 and 5.2 are current and applicable. Table reference: Table adapted from the Southern Center for Training, Education, Extension, Outreach, and Technical Assistance to Enhance Food Safety. Produce Safety Rule Compliance Dates and Timeline. Available at https://producesafetyalliance.cornell.edu/food-safety-modernization-act/produce-safety-rule-compliance-dates-timeline Additional Resources: FDA 2017. Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for Subpart E. Available at www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-09-13/pdf/2017-19434.pdf According to the Proposed Rule issued Sept. 2017, compliance dates for all agricultural water requirements allow for an additional four years. For example, ‘all other businesses’ would have until 2022 to begin taking their water samples. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Revised 10/28/17

FDA Water Compliance Date Extension In September 2017, FDA published a Proposed Rule called Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Compliance Dates for Subpart E. If implemented, extends ALL provisions of Subpart E (Agricultural water) including the safe and sanitary quality requirement, the annual inspection requirement, and the postharvest water monitoring requirements The reason given for this extension is “to address questions about the practical implementation of compliance with certain provisions and to consider how we might further reduce the regulatory burden or increase flexibility while continuing to achieve our regulatory objectives, in keeping with the Administration's policies.” Until more is known, the following water requirements outlined in this module are the Rule. Note: For use in the beginning of Module 5.1, after the slide titled Agricultural Water Quality. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Version 9-2017

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL FDA Water Compliance Date Extension: What Growers Should Do in the Meantime Continue water testing To better understand water quality To meet buyer and audit requirements Develop water management strategies to identify and reduce risks such as conducting surveys of water sources If growers have never tested their water, they should start testing or at least consider the benefits Test for quantified generic E. coli Test before using the water Test during frequent use periods Note: For use in the beginning of Module 5.1, after the supplemental slide titled FDA Water Compliance Date Extension. It is very important for trainers to tell growers that nothing on this slide is required by the FSMA Produce Safety Rule. It is very likely that growers will ask what they should do in the meantime. Most importantly, growers should be encouraged to maintain market access by meeting buyer and audit requirements, many of which require water testing. Growers may also want to inspect their water source and assess risks that could impact its quality by surveying the land around the water source. This could include assessing activities that may be happening upstream that could impact quality (e.g., animal operations that allow animals access to the water source such as grazing cattle). To better understand the quality of the water source, growers may want to begin testing just a few times per year if they have never tested their water in the past. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

FDA Fact Sheet: Equivalent Water Testing Methodologies Equivalent methods to EPA Method 1603 (membrane filtration with modified mTEC), include: Membrane filtration methods (colony forming units, or CFU) mTEC agar (EPA 2010, APHA 2012, ASTM 2000) mColiBlue ampules (Hach method 10029) mEndo followed by NA-MUG agar (APHA 1997) MI agar (EPA 2012) Most Probable Number (MPN) methods Colilert (using Quantitray 2000 tray) Colilert 18 (using Quantitray 2000 tray) Note: For use in Module 5.1, after slide titled Where Do I Go For Testing. In September 2017, FDA released a fact sheet that recognized several equivalent methods for enumeration of generic E. coli. The fact sheet states: FDA has determined that the following methods are “scientifically valid” and “at least equivalent to the method of analysis in § 112.151(a) in accuracy, precision, and sensitivity”. The methods are described in the slide, and references are provided below The list includes some, but not all, of the EPA-accepted methods for monitoring under the Clean Water Act (often, recreational water monitoring) that are listed in 40 CFR 136.3 The image on the top is a membrane filtration test on modified mTEC; the image on the bottom is a Colilert or Colilert-18 most-probable number test on Quantitray 2000 Additional Resources: FDA Fact Sheet 2017. Equivalent Testing Methodologies for Agricultural Water. Available at www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm575251.htm EPA 2006. Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in Water by Membrane Filtration Using Modified membrane-Thermotolerant Escherichia coli Agar (Modified mTEC). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-821-R-06-011 EPA 2010. Escherichia coli (E. coli) in Water by Membrane Filtration Using membrane-Thermotolerant Escherichia coli Agar (mTEC). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-821-R-10-002. APHA 2012. Natural Bathing Beaches (2007). In: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Edition (Rice E.W., et al., Ed.), 9-46 – 9-48. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. (2012) ASTM 2000. Standard Test Method for Isolation and Enumeration of Escherichia coli in Water by the Two-Step Membrane Filter Procedure. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 11.02. ASTM International. (1996, 1999, 2000) Hach Company. Coliforms, Total and E. coli: m-ColiBlue24 Broth PourRite Ampules. Doc316.53.01213, Method 10029, Hach Company APHA 1997. Standard Total Coliform Membrane Filter Procedure (1997), followed by 9222 G – MF Partition Procedures (1997) using NA-MUG media. In: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st Edition (Eaton A.D., et al., Ed.), 9-60 – 9-65, and 9-70 – 9-71, respectively. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. (2005). EPA 2002. Method 1604: Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli in Water by Membrane Filtration Using a Simultaneous Detection Technique (MI Medium). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-821-R-02-024 Idexx, Inc. Colilert. Available at www.idexx.com/water/products/colilert.html Idexx, Inc. Colilert-18. Available at www.idexx.com/water/products/colilert-18.html SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Version 9-2017