Interpersonal vulnerability among offspring of Holocaust survivors gay men and its association with depressive symptoms and life satisfaction Geva Shenkman, Amit Shrira, Kfir Ifrah, Dov Shmotkin Psychiatry Research Volume 259, Pages 89-94 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.017 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Holocaust background indirect effect on depressive symptoms (1a) and life satisfaction (1b) through the hostile-world scenario interpersonal vulnerability. Note: N=166. Reported values on Fig. 1(a) are unstandardized regression coefficients (Bs) for the pathways among Holocaust background (0 = Comparisons, 1= Offspring of Holocaust survivors), interpersonal vulnerability and depressive symptoms. Age served as a covariate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Note: N=177. Reported values on Fig. 1(b) are unstandardized regression coefficients (Bs) for the pathways among Holocaust background (0 = Comparisons, 1= Offspring of Holocaust survivors), interpersonal vulnerability and life satisfaction. Age served as a covariate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Psychiatry Research 2018 259, 89-94DOI: (10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.017) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Holocaust background indirect effect on depressive symptoms (2a) and life satisfaction (2b) through satisfaction from current relationship. Note: N=69. Reported values on Fig. 2(a) are unstandardized regression coefficients (Bs) for the pathways among Holocaust background (0 = Comparisons, 1= Offspring of Holocaust survivors), satisfaction from current relationship and depressive symptoms. Age served as a covariate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Note: N=81. Reported values on Fig. 2(b) are unstandardized regression coefficients (Bs) for the pathways among Holocaust background (0 = Comparisons, 1= Offspring of Holocaust survivors), satisfaction from current relationship and life satisfaction. Age served as a covariate. + p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Psychiatry Research 2018 259, 89-94DOI: (10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.017) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions