Adapted WHO Safe Surgical Checklist in Interventional Cardiology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the Stroke Palliative Approach Pathway
Advertisements

Integrating Children and Young Peoples Services Will Greenhow - Home Affairs David Killip - Health and Social Security John Cain - Department of Education.
20,000 Days Campaign Storyboard Learning Session March 2013
Implementation of Care Bundles in an Acute Children’s Care Setting ‘not without its challenges’! Paula McGrath Project Co-Ordinator Quality Department.
Proactive Rounding – Actively Caring Trudy Reid & Mary Burke Southern HSC Trust WSCNTL 2014, Kings Hall Leading Care, Leading Teams - Innovating and Supporting.
The Introduction of a Specialist Paediatric Vascular Access team Sara Melville, Lead Nurse Vascular Access, Alder Hey.
Revised for 2013 Shannon Hein RN, CPN(C).  published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in May 2004  Found an overall incidence rate of adverse.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
Valuing People - Implementing a Programme to Reduce Restrictive Practices Liz Williams, Clinical Services Director Cambian Group.
Safer Medicines Outcomes on Transfer Home
Hawaii Surgical Unit Safety Program: The Journey Begins with the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program May 21, 2013 Della M. Lin, M.D.
‘WHO is kidding WHO’ Prospective Re-Audit of the implementation Pre-briefing and the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at FPH August 2011 Department of Surgery.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Hospital Operational Standards Jennie Hall, Chief Nurse Dr Ros Given-Wilson, Medical Director Martin Wilson, Director of Delivery and Improvement.
Amanda Fegan Lead Associate, NHS Institute Hugh Rogers FRCS Consultant Urologist Senior Associate, NHS Institute The Productive Operating Theatre Building.
Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS Cambrian School District April 2011.
Accreditation Canada’s Safe Surgery Checklist Required Organizational Practice (ROP) Greg Kennedy Checklist Action Series May 26, 2010 Greg Kennedy Checklist.
Performance Position July Delivering the right care, at the right time, in the right place CONTEXT Ambulance service significant activity increase.
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
PRI 1 Introduction to Perioperative Nursing A Primer for Perioperative Education.
World Health Organisation WHO Checklist 2011 Jacqui Blackwell.
Check a Box. Save a Life. The 1 st Global Student Sprint to Improve Healthcare October 22, 2009.
Increasing Post-Surgical Debriefing Completion Rate Quality Improvement Study Ambulatory Surgery Center.
Context and Problem Effects of Changes Strategy for Change Aim: To reduce the length of handover by standardising the quality of information transmitted.
Surgical Complications WHO Surgical Safety Check list Collaborative – LS3 Chair: Simon Phillips Director: Jonathon Gray.
Parallels in Training Techniques A Quality Approach
2 What’s in this presentation? We are seeking the board’s approval and advice on beginning a programme of work on culture and leadership across our trust.
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Turning national guidance into local reality
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Title of the Change Project
Welcome Debriefing – Level 1 Main title slide page
Title of the Change Project
The System The System is a series produced by TVC in collaboration with BSIR and supported by The Healthcare Foundation. These support materials focus.
Title of the Change Project
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Alan Willson 17 November 2010
HEE Nursing Associate Programme
Safety and Quality in the Cardiothoracic Operating Room
Chapter 5 Using Huddles.
15 CHS & 5 Orthopaedic Patients, 3 DNs, 2 Nurse Managers, 2 Inpatient RNs, ADON used the Safety Thermometer Tool over 13 weeks.
Title of the Change Project
Paediatric Orthopaedic MSK Pathways Pamela Holland
District Nursing and the Safety thermometer.
World class healthcare for Wales by 2015
Person Centred Care in NHS Wales
What are the attitudes and perceptions of Surgeons and Scrub Nurses towards Surgical Briefing and Debriefing? Pamela Firth, BSc. Golden Jubilee National.
Death Documentation and Communication: Improvement through electronic innovation James McCallum Associate Medical Director 15th March 2017.
Introducing 1000 Lives Plus
N. Ruggiero Perrino. , R. Lionetti. ,M. D’Ambra. , S. Dilillo. , D
Ventricular Septal Defect Pre-PICU Clinical Pathway
Collaboration Summary Report Graphic
Clinical Pharmacist Service
Powys teaching Health Board
Quality Improvement Projects - a national update
Tobacco Program Coalition
GMHC Board of Directors November 14, 2016
E-government Working Group
ايمني بيمار PATIENT SAFETY حق بيمار و مسئوليت ما
Meeting Objectives Build skills among care team members that will improve teamwork, communication, and create a patient safety culture in your unit Hear.
Making MDTs better Steve Falk
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery WebEx 1
Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care
Principal recommendations
Diagnosis of disease M2/D2
Programme Board meeting
Reducing Falls in Ward 5D and increasing days between falls
Introducing 1000 Lives Plus
CELEBRATING POWYS TEACHING HEALTH BOARD.
The Effects of Debriefing Following Medical Error
Presentation transcript:

Adapted WHO Safe Surgical Checklist in Interventional Cardiology National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP’s) 2, 4 Place: Cardiac Catheter Laboratory (CCL)– Non-NHS service Author: I V George ; A Oliveira Abstract Objective: To ensure the effective integration of adapted WHO checklist, enable and embed the safety culture, to achieve regular and consistent briefing and de-briefing for all patients undergoing interventional procedure in CCL. Methods: Data was collected from total of 75 patients within 3 cohorts and 10 staffs using simple data collection tool and snapshot perception study. Results: Progressive improvement in all aspects from cohort 1 to cohort 3, 100% completion of the checklist at cohort 3, lowest average effective process time (3.6 minutes), considerable reduction in delay from start time of the procedure and 90% increase in perception level among staffs. Conclusion: Effective use of resources, quality and safety will be positively enhance by good MDT work, communication with a structured process . Method Prospective study in total of 75 patients over 4 months undergoing procedures in CCL was audited for the completeness of the WHO checklist, duration of briefing and de-briefing process times, delay in the start of procedure and snap shot perception of team view on effectiveness and safety. Study was performed by cohorts; 1st cohort of 15 consecutive patients before the introduction of adapted checklist, I week after introduction 2nd cohort of 45 consecutive patients and 3 months later re-audited with 3rd cohort of15 consecutive patients Team view was collected using snapshot perception study after 1st, 2nd and 3rd cohorts. Results Actual Start Time Introduction In 2008, World Health Organisation (WHO) launched surgical safety checklist as part of the initiative “Safe Surgery Saves Lives” aimed to improve the quality and safety of surgery by reducing complications and death by team work 1,2,4,5. In 2009, NHS adapted the checklist with the core content in collaboration with National Reporting and Learning Services (NRLS) expert group for all surgical procedures to reduce the harm as a direct result of the surgery 2,3,4,5. In 2015, NHS England produced NatSSIP’s guidance 2,4,5. 14 % of overall safety incident reported from 1993 to 2003 was from cardiovascular along with ENT2,4, however as a proactive member in 2010, CCL adapted the WHO checklist as local SSIP to effectively integrate for use within the interventional cardiology. Completion Of WHO Checklist Average Time for Briefing and De-briefing Process Staff Perception of Safety and Effectiveness Discussion Cohort 1 has the worst statistical data overall, no structure, communication between the MDT, prolonged delays, however informal briefing was carried out for lengthy period averaging 16.7 minutes. Cohort 2 with the implementation of adapted WHO checklist, initial time period had results similar to cohort 1, however, improvement was evident in terms of 75% reduction in delays, 85% increase in completion rate, briefing and de-briefing carried out effectively(average of 6.2 minutes), active involvement and communication between MDT was seen. Cohort 3 with the use of the process and sustainment, CCL had achieved the set aims. Conclusion Use of adapted WHO checklist improve the safety and effectiveness considerably in CCL and also encourages the involvement and perception of MDT Staffs. With the efficient and successful adaption for CCL, implementation of this process in other areas that are govern by NatSSIP will be beneficial such as interventional radiology, outpatients and endoscopy. Overall, adapted WHO checklist can be used to standardise and harmonise as part of NatSSIP’s. Aims The aim is to achieve 100% completion of adapted WHO checklist and document of briefing and debriefing process for all patients undergoing procedure in CCL and increase the perception level of safety and effectiveness among Multi Disciplinary Team (MDT) staffs. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/ (accessed on 24/02/2016) https://www.england.nhs.uk/patientsafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2015/09/natssips-safety-standards.pdf (accessed on 24/02/2016) http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59860 (accessed on 24/02/2016) https://www.aquanw.nhs.uk/members/articles/reasons-and-benefits-safer-site-surgery/4029 (accessed on 24/02/2016) http://www.ihi.org/resources/pages/tools/whosurgicalsafetychecklistgettingstartedkit.aspx (accessed on 24/02/2016) I would like to acknowledge the MDT (CCL) for their time and support Reference