C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

S ENSITIVITIES OF S PECTRAL N UDGING T OWARD M OISTURE FOR R EGIONAL C LIMATE M ODELING Tanya L. Otte 1, Martin J. Otte 1, Jared H. Bowden 2, and Christopher.
CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON US AIR QUALITY: EXAMINATION OF OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND THEIR SENSITIVITY TO EMISSION CHANGES Tagaris.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Cost-effective dynamical downscaling: An illustration of downscaling CESM with the WRF model Jared H. Bowden and Saravanan Arunachalam 11 th Annual CMAS.
A statistical method for calculating the impact of climate change on future air quality over the Northeast United States. Collaborators: Cynthia Lin, Katharine.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Effect of global change on ozone air quality in the United States Shiliang Wu, Loretta Mickley, Daniel Jacob, Eric Leibensperger, David Rind.
Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Does ozone model performance vary as a function of synoptic meteorological type? Pat Dolwick, Christian Hogrefe, Mark Evangelista, Chris Misenis, Sharon.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Future Wildfire Activity over the Southeast U.S. using Dynamical Downscaling Jared H. Bowden Kevin D. Talgo Uma.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Modeling the Health Impacts of Changes.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
Diagnosing the sensitivity of O 3 air quality to climate change over the United States Moeko Yoshitomi Daniel J. Jacob, Loretta.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Assessment of aerosol direct effects on surface radiation in the northern hemisphere using two-way WRF-CMAQ model Jia Xing, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Using WRF for Regional Climate Modeling: An Emphasis on the Southeast U.S. for Future Air Quality Jared H. Bowden (UNC) Kevin D. Talgo (UNC) Tanya L. Spero.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Influences of Regional Climate Change on Air Quality across the Continental U.S. Projected from Downscaling IPCC AR5 Simulations Christopher G. Nolte1.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Examining the impact of aerosol direct.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Projecting Changes in Climate and Air Quality for the Southeastern U.S. Chris Nolte.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
Stephany Taylor1,2, Tanya Spero1 and Megan Mallard1
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
15th Annual CMAS Conference
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
Land Use in Regional Climate Modeling
Dynamic Evaluation of CMAQ-Modeled Ozone Response to Emission Changes in The South coast air Basin Prakash Karamchandani1, Ralph Morris1, Andrew Wentland1,
Tanya L. Spero1, Megan S. Mallard1, Stephany M
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
CRC NARSTO-Northeast Modeling Study
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
16th Annual CMAS Conference
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Modeling the impacts of green infrastructure land use changes on air quality and meteorology—case study and sensitivity analysis in Kansas City Yuqiang.
The West Coast Thermal Trough
Heather Simon, Kirk Baker, Norm Possiel, Pat Dolwick, Brian Timin
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
WRAP 2014 Regional Modeling
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

Examining Projected Changes in Ozone at 2050 and 2090 under Two CMIP5 Scenarios C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC CMAS Users Conference 25 October 2017

Introduction We are interested in how future environmental conditions will impact air quality General approach: Use WRF to dynamically downscale CMIP5 scenarios over North America Use these as meteorological inputs to CMAQ to simulate changes in air quality for some future period U.S. emissions of NOX, SO2, and VOCs have declined substantially since 1990, and are projected to continue to decline in the coming decades due to already-adopted AQ regulations We allow biogenic emissions to vary with simulated meteorology, but use same anthropogenic emissions inventory and chemical boundary conditions for both base and future periods to isolate the effect of changing average weather patterns

Modeling Configuration CESM data (0.9° × 1.25°) downscaled with WRFv3.4.1 36-km domain over most of North America (199 × 127 grid points) 34 layers up to 50 hPa Continuous WRF runs (no reinitialization) from 1995-2005 and 2025-2100 Spectral nudging of wavelengths >1500 km toward CESM fields, above PBL only This work examines conditions at 2050 and 2090 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, relative to 2000 using 11-year simulation periods CMAQ 5.2 beta with CB05 chemical mechanism over Continental U.S. domain (148 × 110 grid cells) Projected 2040 anthropogenic emissions developed as reference case for regulatory impact analysis of HD GHG rule Relative to 2011 NEI: −51% NOX, −66% SO2, −14% VOC Wildfires unchanged, no LNOx, windblown dust, or bidirectional exchange of NH3

Previous Work – Changes at 2030 RCP4.5 RCP6.0 RCP8.5 ppb K (2025–2035) minus (1995–2005) JJA daily max temperature JJA maximum daily 8-h O3 Increases of 0.5-4 K under RCP4.5 and RCP6.0 and 1-6 K under RCP8.5 O3 increases by 0.5-4.5 ppb in areas generally collocated with increased T Southwest and especially Southeast show little to no change in T and slight decrease in O3 in Gulf Coast

JJA daily max temperatures Changes at 2050 and 2090 JJA daily max temperatures JJA MDA8 O3 Pattern of temperature and O3 increases is similar for daily maximum vs daily means, as well as for JJA and May-Sept months. Strong temperature increases, especially at 2090 under RCP8.5 O3 increases 1-4 ppb in Upper Midwest, Ohio Valley, and Northeast, exceeding 8 ppb at 2090 under RCP8.5 Warming is least in Southeast, with actual decreases in O3 in Gulf Coast What is causing these O3 decreases in the Southeast?

Regional Change in O3 Distribution

Mean Sea-level Pressure Little change in mean SLP pattern Suggests change in O3 not primarily due to changes in transport

Wind Speed % change in JJA average 10-m wind speed Change in JJA average MDA8 O3 (ppb) Stronger increase in wind speeds in TX-LA-MS in RCP8.5 may be contributing to lower O3? Wind speeds also increase in KS-IA in RCP4.5, and O3 increases there.

Precipitation Change in JJA average precipitation (mm/mon) Decreases in central US and Ohio Valley, increases in Southeast, particularly at 2090 under RCP8.5

Precipitation Change in JJA average precipitation (mm/mon) Change in JJA average MDA8 O3 (ppb) Decrease in central US and Ohio Valley consistent with increased O3 Increases in Southeast generally consistent with areas of decreased O3 Anomalous behavior in Southeast TX and LA

Change in JJA average MDA8 O3 (ppb) Change in JJA average RH Relative Humidity Change in JJA average MDA8 O3 (ppb) Change in JJA average RH Better matches pattern of change in O3

Biogenic Isoprene Emissions Percent change in isoprene emissions Change in JJA average MDA8 O3 (ppb) Isoprene emissions depend on both temperature and solar radiation (PAR) Smaller increase in Southeast may partially explain lower O3 than Ohio Valley Does not account for absolute decreases in O3

Summary Strong warming projected across continental US. Warming is higher at 2090 than at 2050, and under RCP8.5 than under RCP4.5 Changes in future weather conditions result in projected increases in O3 of 1-4 ppb in parts of Central US and Ohio Valley under RCP4.5, exceeding 8 ppb at 2090 under RCP8.5 Decreases in O3 of 1-3 ppb simulated in Southeast US These findings are preliminary—further investigation is needed to determine which processes are most important in accounting for anomalous behavior in Southeast

Regional Change in O3 Distribution

Regional change in O3 distribution

Percent change in PBL Height