Anna Colaleo - INFN-Bari On behalf of the CMS Muon group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 News and Miscellaneous UPO May Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding -Phase 2 Scope and Cost exercise.
Advertisements

CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals October 21, 2014 Jeremiah Mans On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
Status & Goals of LHC 1 1pb-1 of delivered and recorded luminosities reached! As of this morning: Delivered: 1420 nb-1 Recorded: 1245 nb-1 New record Inst.
IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics1. IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics2 OUTLINES oLHC parametres oRPCs oOverview of muon trigger system oIdea of.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
US CMS Phase 2 R&D Discussion 30-July-2013 “Phase 2 muon R&D” J. Hauser, UCLA  Add redundancy (power) to trigger where most needed  First and innermost.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
The CMS Upgrade Program ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop Aix-les-Bains, October 1, 2013 J. Spalding, on behalf of the CMS Collaboration 1.
2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, California S. Colafranceschi (CERN) and M. Hohlmann (Florida Institute of Technology) (for the CMS GEM Collaboration)
Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.
Workshop 24 Jun 11 AB Workshop on GEMs for CMS high  Last September’s workshop showed that MPGD technology is now mature. Stable operation of large area.
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
A new generation of RPCs to be tested for the super- LHC CERN GIF workshop 20/06/2011 G. Aielli.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
C. F. Bedoya. C. F. Bedoya May 13th, * The goal was to establish a baseline plan for DT in Phase 2, (although some aspects of phase 1 also needed.
Gap Production for Upscope of the Endcap RPCs Sung Keun Park Korea Detector Laboratory Korea University February 5, 2010 Workshop on the Forward CMS RPC.
PHASE-1B ACTIVITIES L. Demaria – INFN Torino. Introduction  The inner layer of the Phase 1 Pixel detector is exposed to very high level of irradiation.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
25-Oct-2013 Upgrades Week “Muon plans for the Phase 2 TP” J. Hauser, UCLA  Phase 2 muon plans (presented at ECFA),  What’s new since Upgrade Week  New.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
Marcus Hohlmann (Florida Institute of Technology) with C. Armaingaud, S. Colafranceschi, R. De Oliveira, and A. Sharma (CERN) on behalf of the CMS GEM.
P. Dupieux (ALICE), A. Cardini (LHCb) M. Abbrescia, K. Hoepfner, A. Safonov (CMS) Ch. Amelung, O. Kortner, S. Veneziano (ATLAS) 4t meeting with the HL-LHC.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal”  Recent developments:  ME0 inserted into HGCAL as for other.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
Marcello Abbrescia RPCs for CMS during Phase II RPC rate capability M. Abbrescia, The dynamic behaviour of Resistive Plate Chambers, NIM A 533 (2004) 7–10.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
1 Towards Phase 2 TP releases 2013 Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding Status of current simulations studies and ongoing issues Needs for TP preparation.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
DT UPGRADE STRATEGY M.Dallavalle for the DT Collaboration 6/26/12 Muon IB1.
The CMS Muon System BAN Yong, Peking University 2006/12/12 IHEP, Beijing, China Outline: CMS-Muon system: introduction China’s contribution to CMS Muon.
The Phase-1 Extension of the CMS Endcap RPC System Michael Tytgat on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Outline :  Introduction  RPC Upgrade  Simulation.
Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
CMS Drift Tubes Gruppi di Bologna, Padova, Torino G.M. Dallavalle
Imad Laktineh IPN-Lyon On behalf of the CMS muon group
CMS Trigger Improvements towards Run II
(University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”)
University of Wisconsin
Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Gas Detectors (GEM) The 6th Egyptian school for high energy physics
SLHC Muon Upgrades and Impact on Trigger
Atlas: Upgrade Phase I Massimo Della Pietra.
A proposal to equip the high eta muon stations with High Rate GRPC
The Ohio State University
RPC built a new plastic (peek doped with CB)
ATLAS-MUON Trigger hardware developments
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Optical data transmission for
Multigap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPC)
Third Workshop on GEMs for CMS
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
Not baseline: ASIC, DCFEB R&D if L1A latency > 10 ms
Why Micromegas? Muon Upgrade Workshop, 27/01/2012 Jörg Wotschack.
A microTCA Based DAQ System for the CMS GEM Upgrade
RPC and LST at High Luminosity
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
Phase 2 R&D – Brief Introduction –
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
SVT detector electronics
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Anna Colaleo - INFN-Bari On behalf of the CMS Muon group Muon Phase2 Upgrade CMS Muon system Design and optimisation considerations Anna Colaleo - INFN-Bari On behalf of the CMS Muon group 3rd ECFA Workshop on High Luminosity LHC- 3-6 October, 2016 Aix-Les-Bains, France

CMS muon upgrade scope Goal: maintain excellent triggering, ID, and measurement of muons under harsher HL-LHC conditions (instantaneous and integrated L) up to |h|<3 Existing detectors: consolidation of detector operation; barrel DT and endcap CSC electronics upgrade New forward muon detectors: GEM in GE1/1 (approved), GE2/1, and ME0; improved RPC in RE3/1 and RE4/1 DT CSC ME0 GE1/1 GE2/1 iRPC DT and CSC electronics replacement to handle longevity issues and L1 trigger (750 kHz) rate and latency (12.5 ms) New forward detectors to handle most difficult region, with high background trigger and readout rates, and limited bending ME0 extends offline muon coverage up to h=2.9

Radiation Environment HL-LHC background – 5x rates and 6x total doses with respect to LHC Exceed the design tolerances of several components of the muon system: - new assessment of the chambers and electronics longevity, operation and performance

Consolidation: studies and plans Improve detector shielding Aging campaign at GIF++ ongoing to assess longevity of existing detector at HL-LHC Monitor detector operation in CMS and develop mitigation strategies Stability of the gas gain, RPC electrode resistivity hit efficiency, cluster-size, noise, I vs HV. Optimize gas gain and HV working point between different detector region to prolong the system lifetime Mitigate the failure rates of detectors and electronics modules with preventive maintenance during LHC stops Gas studies: Stricter EU regulation on gas emission might restrict the use of greenhouse gases R&D program on searching and studying possible substitutes for C2H2F4, CF4, SF6 develop an operational model maintaining acceptable performance with reduced percentage of greenhouse gases in the mixtures.

Muon consolidation studies at GIF++ CERN GIF++: 662 keV photons emitted by an intense 14 TBq 137Cs source + high momentum particle beam ME1/1 ME2/1 GE1/1 RPC DT CSC: 1 ME1/1 and 1 ME2/1 DT: 1 MB1 GEM: 1 GE1/1 RPC: 1 RE2 and 1 RE4 Strategy: Longevity studies of full size chamber under realistic with an accelerator factor which allows to accumulate radiation dose (in < 2 years) corresponding to x3 the expected after 3000 fb-1 In parallel an accelerated aging test on small prototypes to study mitigation strategies in case of aging and test of new mixtures (CSC/RPC) If any aging is observed in the chambers and/or new mixtures found ( RPC/CSC) undertake new longevity tests on full size chamber under the new operation conditions.

The DT Electronics upgrade Main concerns come from Minicrates: Each DT chamber is equipped with a on-chamber MiniCrate containing Trigger, Read-out, Control and Link electronics Current minicrates are large and containing 17 boards of 6 different types. Some components certified only up to 500 fb-1 Maintenance only possible during long shutdowns and intervention on detector is increasingly difficult L1 trigger accept rate limited to 300 kHz: readout limitation MC2 Upgrade system: Move the large fraction of the functionality outside the experimental cavern Trigger primitives directly generated from TDCs (as done now at HLT) The new minicrates (MC2) will be very small and only containing TDCs, optical links and slow control services.

The DT Electronics upgrade On-Board-Electronics-DT (OBDT) with high-resolution TDC data continuously transmitted through optical fibers. LV power supplies in cavern will be replaced to appropriate to match to new low-power electronics Commercial processors in service cavern performing Trigger and high-speed Read-Out (1 MHz without data loss) operations of the TDC data new trigger primitive generation with a resolution close to those of present HLT reconstructed segments rate reduction and efficient matching with Track-trigger Full electronics system replacement in LS3

The CSC Electronics upgrade Main concerns come from Cathode Front-end Board (CFEB) where data storage is done inside a switched-capacitor analog ASIC with very limited buffering: At HL-LHC latency and rate, data storage buffers fill up and CFEB becomes inefficient large data loss level is reached for all inner chambers MEX/1 at 750 kHz and 12.5 us latency On-detector electronics upgrade largely as built for the first station of inner chambers (ME1/1) and already done in LS1: CFEB replaced with DCFEB (Flash-digitize every strip at 40 MHz, and large digital data memory storage) and optical data output on 3.2 Gbps optical links

The CSC Electronics upgrade On-chamber CFEB replaced with DCFEB (108 chambers) ALCT mezzanine cards in situ (396 chambers) Off- chamber Trigger Mother Boards (TMB) with Optical-TMB (OTMB) for inner rings Data Mother Boards (DMB) with new Optical-DMBs (ODMB) Readout (FEDs) with standard commercial modules Components to be replaced are highlighted in yellow Current Electronics Configuration for CSC Readout TMB, DMB CFEB ALCT Access for on-chamber electronics replacement possible only in LS2. Replacement of DMB and FED electronics in LS3

The forward muon system challenges Eta coverage: |η|<1.6: 4 layers of CSCs , RPCs, DTs the |η|≥1.6: CSCs only; The forward region |h|1.6 is very challenging Redundancy: the highest rates in the system but meanwhile fewest muon layers the trigger and offline performance can degrade due to aging of existing detectors Rate: high background and higher towards higher eta worse momentum resolution will degrade trigger performance in forward region. First step to address this is installation of GE1/1 during LS2 10

The forward Muon Upgrade Scope Address challenges with muon trigger/reconstruction: Maintaining low muon momentum thresholds for triggering on soft muon: Higgs, SUSY, b physics, EXO scenarios Preserving sensitivity to displaced signatures (exotic physics models: HSCP, Dark Matter..) Cope with background and PU with precise timing detectors Increases offline acceptance Maintain 15 GeV online threshold, keep < 5 kHz rate rate reduction x5 Track-Trigger Mu inefficient for dxy >1 cm.

The forward muon system upgrade GE1/1: Trigger and reconstruction 1.55 < |η| < 2.1 baseline detector for GEM project 36 super-chambers (SC)- two layers of triple-GEM chambers- per disk, each SC spans 10° Installation in LS2. TDR approved in Sept. 2015 RE 3/1 –RE4/1 : ME0: GE2/1: Trigger and reconstruction 2 < |η| < 2.9 each chamber spans 20° 6 layers of GEM-like technology Trigger and reconstruction 1.55 < |η| < 2.46 18 SC per endcap, each chamber covers 20° 2 layers GEM-like technology Installation before LS3 Trigger and reconstruction 1.8 < |η| < 2.4 18 chambers per endcap, each chamber spans 20° 1 layer RPC-like technology Installation before LS3

The GE2/1 detector YE2 YE1 Shielding ME2/1 CSC 81 mm 1837 mm 1178 mm The station GE2/1 consists of 72 triple-GEM chambers arranged in 36 200 Super-chambers, covering 1.60<||<2.46. Layout is similar to GE1/1, but covering much larger surface: Will be the largest triple-GEM chambers built 13 Optimization of engineering design for mass production on-going Reinforcement elements GE2/1 only 81 mm clearance including services four foil modules structure per 20- degree chamber, 6 φ-sectors × 8 η- sectors total RE2/2 RE2/2 Option for m-R-Well technology as compact and low cost large detector (G. Bencivenni et al., 2015_JINST_10_P02008)

The ME0 Detector Extend muon tagging coverage up to h~2.9 and enhance trigger to h~2.4 range using space available in the back of the new endcap calorimeter ME0 baseline is 6 layers of triple-GEMs arranged in 200 super-module wedges. High granularity spatial segmentation for: Position and bending measurement of the muon stubs for efficient matching of offline pixel tracks. Muon track Df Multi-layered structure to: improve local muon track reconstruction discriminate muon (segment) against neutrons (uncorr hits). Option: precision timing Option for Fast Timing Micro-pattern (FTM) detector to reject background hits from pile-up and neutron background – small prototype under study (Maggi, De Oliveira, Sharma arXiv:1503.05330v1)

RPCs for RE3/1 and RE4/1 Restore redundancy with two 72 RPC stations with improved rate capabilities 2.0 kHz/cm2 (vs present 0.3 kHz/cm2 ) and stable performance at HL-LHC. Detector R&D on-going: Reduced electrode resistivity: about 1010 Ωcm (bakelite or glass option) Reduced electrode and gas gap thickness (<1.5 mm vs present 2 mm) New generation low-noise FE electronics for high efficiency/less aging Finer pitch option for high spatial resolution: 1-2 mm vs. current ~1 cm Multigap option for high timing accuracy 1997 TDR 0.3 kHz/cm2 Baseline “Double-gap” configuration HPL (bakelite) electrodes, Thin 2-double-gap HPL-bakelite Multi-gap glass

Muon upgrade timeline GE1/1 Technical Design Report (TDR) approved as being the first CMS Phase II TDR, following the need of early operation in LS2. Muon TDR Q4-2017: Design and demonstration phases for Detectors and Front-end electronics Upgrade by Q4-2017 CMS upgrade activity optimization requires Anticipation of CSC Front-end upgrade in LS2 Installation of GE2/1 and RE3/1-RE4/1 detectors in Extended Technical Stops before LS3 DT electronics, CSC back-end electronics and ME0 upgrade in LS3

Summary Muon Upgrade program will allow for continued excellent muon performance throughout the whole Phase 2: Consolidation of existing detectors: mitigation strategies in place in case of detector aging. DT and CSC electronics replacement to handle longevity issues and L1 trigger rate and latency Enhancement of the forward region 1.6< h< 2.4 in order to preserve the standalone muon trigger efficiency and reconstruction capabilities in the HL- LHC era. Extension to the most forward region |h|>2.4 with a muon station to increase acceptance to new signals and to improve background rejection. Design and demonstration phases for Detectors and Front-end electronics Upgrade are ongoing Work is starting to put together the Phase II Muon TDR (Q4 2017)